With who? He’s not a popular president. He can’t get the public to rally to his agenda. Most think he’s incompetent. The AZ and WV senators have nothing to lose opposing him.
Hecklers impact public opinion on health reform datelined 2009 Aug 13
After two weeks of health care demonstrations and daily town hall disruptions in the news, Democrats seem to be losing ground on the reform debate.
A new USA Today poll finds 34% of Americans are now more sympathetic to the protesters' views, while 21% are less sympathetic. It's bad news for the White House.
They blame the bad numbers on misconceptions and misinformation. One misconception riling up crowds are the so-called "death panels" that some claim are part of reform.
I find it disturbing, those incidents of following KS around. Even though they were mild by the standards of what happened to Mitt Romney and Lindsey Graham and those town halls.
I also note that KS has not had a town-hall event in years, for at least her Senate years. She also does not do interviews or appear on political TV shows.
But aside from that, she continues to be a fashion plate. When some people tried to ask her about something in a Senate office building, she wore a white shirt and a ruffled pink skirt. When some people confronted her in that ASU bathroom, she was wearing an ankle-length sleeveless pink dress wtih black and white rectangles on it. On the plane, she was wearing a black-and-white patterned dress with a neckline low enough to show some cleavage.
The only people she seems to care about is big-money lobbyists, and she may want money from them to feed her clothing habit. But then again, she may rent a lot of her clothes, as AOC and Ana Kasparian do.
I give KS a very wide understanding here. She's in a difficult spot. She represents an area that is to the right of the party that she is in. Furthermore, she (and Joe) are taking the blame for the difficulty in passing democratic policies. But the real problem for the dems is the razer thin margins that we have to deal with. If democrats want to pass democratic legislation that the right hates, then bust your ass and increase the democratic majority congress and the senate. The real problem here is that our tent isn't big enough. And to try to exclude people at the edge of the tent, is crazy!
With who? He’s not a popular president. He can’t get the public to rally to his agenda. Most think he’s incompetent. The AZ and WV senators have nothing to lose opposing him.
The bipartisan infrastructure bill remains quite popular: 56% support, 27% oppose.
With who? He’s not a popular president. He can’t get the public to rally to his agenda. Most think he’s incompetent. The AZ and WV senators have nothing to lose opposing him.
Some people link to economists' papers or FRED graphs. Some people prefer random 20-second CNN sound-bites. You do you, Trausti![snipped: 20-second sound-bite and indecipherable images]
I had never heard of them before. Hmmm....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinnipiac_University
Small religious university.
Quinnipiac's polling institute receives national recognition for its independent surveys of residents throughout the United States. It conducts public opinion polls on politics and public policy as a public service as well as for academic research.[41] The poll has been cited by major news outlets throughout North America and Europe, including The Washington Post,[42] Fox News,[43] USA Today,[44] The New York Times,[45] CNN,[46] and Reuters.[47]
The polling operation began informally in 1988 in conjunction with a marketing class.[41] It became formal in 1994 when the university hired a CBS News analyst to assess the data being gained.[41] It subsequently focused on the Northeastern states, gradually expanding during presidential elections to cover swing states as well.[41] The institute receives funding from the university,[41] with its phone callers generally being work study students or local residents. The polls have been rated highly by FiveThirtyEight for accuracy in predicting primary and general elections.
The Arizona senator, who started in politics as an environmentalist, is one of two centrist Democrats who could make or break a spending bill at the center of President Biden’s legislative agenda.
...
Last month, Ms. Sinema told The Arizona Republic, “We know that a changing climate costs Arizonans. And right now, we have the opportunity to pass smart policies to address it — looking forward to that.” In her 2018 run for the Senate, Ms. Sinema was endorsed by the League of Conservation Voters. And she has expressed an interest in using the spending bill to enact a tax or fee on carbon dioxide pollution, which experts say could be among the most effective ways to mitigate global warming.
"You know I know Joe Manchin, I've known Joe for many years. know Sen. Sinema less well actually. And I'm not here to attack them, question their motives or anything else. Manchin's views, I know, are different than mine - there's no question about that. It's not a crime - people can have different a points of view. But the point that I am trying to make, the bottom line is when you got 48 people on one side, when you got overwhelmingly strong numbers from the American people on one side, when you got the President of the United States on one side, it is simply not fair, not right, that one of the people say my way or the highway. You know I've said this before this is true: believe that the current healthcare system is totally dysfunctional - totally dysfunctional. I believe absolutely that we have moved to a Medicare for all, single payer system. But you know what I don't know how many people in the senate support that, 15, 20 maybe - not the majority. I cannot go to Schumer and say 'Hey Chuck, unless you put Medicare for all reconsideration, I'm not going to vote...'
"My criticism of Sens. Manchin and Sinema is not their views, they're entitled to their views. disagree with their views, they are entitled to their views. But my strong criticism is it is wrong when the American people, when the President of the United States, when 96% of your colleagues want to go forward. It is wrong to obstruct."
Benefits for All or Just the Needy? Manchin’s Demand Focuses Debate - The New York Times - "As Democrats ponder cutting a $3.5 trillion social safety net bill down to perhaps $2 trillion, a proposal to limit programs to the poor has rekindled a debate on the meaning of government itself."Most forms of means testing ignore the facts:
1. Simple income caps ignore cost of living differences in city/state
2. Even pre-COVID, 40% of Americans didn’t have $400 in savings. Poverty levels are far outdated, not good way to tell who needs help.
3. Most forms of means testing put in place arbitrary fiscal cliffs, add huge complexity that requires big administrative costs & erects barriers for neediest.
4. Universal programs—or simple means testing like 7% of income cap on childcare—are simple & universal.
We also don't means-test military and police protection. Part of the success of those, and also Social Security and Medicare, is the lack of means testing. It builds a much bigger base of support for it.With Republicans routinely bashing them as the party of the rich, Democrats may have a hard time defending a plan that lavishes benefits on the leafy suburbs of Montclair and Chatham, N.J. But they also know that the most popular government programs — and the most stable ones — have been those broadly enjoyed, even by the upper reaches of the middle class, such as Social Security and Medicare.
Liberal Democrats, as well as some from politically competitive districts like Ms. Sherrill’s, argue that the bill’s benefits should be available to everyone. That would mean fewer programs — but more comprehensive ones.
“We don’t ask parents, when they send a child to first grade, how much money they make. We say bring that child in, and we’re going to do the best we can to give her a first-rate education,” Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, said. She added, “We build roads and bridges without asking who should be allowed to ride on them. We say everyone rides, because it makes us all better off.”
fagottini on Twitter: "Kyrsten Sinema avoiding her constituents (vid link)" / Twitter
Cute, but I call bullpoop on that. KS is athletic, yes, and she does Ironman races. But the "KS" in that video is unusually athletic, able to do pull-ups with ease. She is also dressed in a black shirt and black pants, very plain by KS standards.
fagottini on Twitter: "Kyrsten Sinema avoiding her constituents (vid link)" / Twitter
Cute, but I call bullpoop on that. KS is athletic, yes, and she does Ironman races. But the "KS" in that video is unusually athletic, able to do pull-ups with ease. She is also dressed in a black shirt and black pants, very plain by KS standards.
Good catch!