It seems that a major difference between Trump and past presidents is that Trump doesn't use layers of filters that refine his positions before they get to the public.
You say that as if it's a good thing for our country's top diplomat just dump every shit he has into the world.
The disadvantages are that we get a birds eye view of the rawness of the personality of a president in real time. I'm not convinced we'd like many of the past occupants of the WH if their true personalities and wishes were so available so quickly before debate with administration officials and staff can be acheived.
Your assumption is that Trump is an intellectual equal to past presidents. All evidence proves that is by no means the case.
In the past we've had to wait years and the passing of the person before we get books written about them and all the nasty and silly shit they do and say.
Those books are all fun to read, I'm sure, but they are, at best, hearsay, anecdotal accounts and thus prone to all manner of aggrandizement, out of context error and mythology. Unlike this idiot's tweets.
And that's assuming we know who writes them.
LBJ was openly obsessed with the size of his penis, and JFK had his secretary giving BJs to officials to gain favor with them, but we didn't get wind of any of this until years after their deaths.
I'm fairly certain even Trump wouldn't tweet about the size of his dick or about the blowjobs he forced upon Kellyanne, but he might. That doesn't mean he should, nor does that give us any real insight into the man, other than the fact that we already know he's a sexual predator.
You seem to be trying to spin his behavior as some sort of net positive, because it gives us insight into his thinking as President, but actually it gives us insight into his inability to be President. Iow, it is not giving us insight into the Presidency; it is giving us insight into the man.
