• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Republican senator: Women's concern over their constitutional rights is just 'hysteria'

phands

Veteran Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
1,976
Location
New York, Manhattan, Upper West Side
Basic Beliefs
Hardcore Atheist
Another misogynist scumbag.....

[FONT=&quot]Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE), the guy who loves to issue vague, passive-aggressive statementsthat might be signaling that he might not be happy with something the unindicted co-conspirator in the Oval Office says, is not at all vague when it comes to putting the little ladies of the Senate in their place. What's all this about Roe v. Wade, he wants to know, then brings out a dog whistle everyone can hear.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]"People are going to pretend that Americans have no historical memory," he said, "and supposedly there haven't been screaming protesters saying, 'Women are going to die' at every hearing for decades." Got that? "Screaming" protesters. He's just getting warmed up, though. "The fact that the hysteria has nothing to do with [Kavanaugh] means that we should ask what's the hysteria coming from?" Ooooh, a two "hysteria" sentence. But wait. "The hysteria around Supreme Court confirmation hearings is coming from the fact that we have a fundamental misunderstanding of the role of the Supreme Court in American life now."[/FONT]

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...-their-Constitutional-rights-is-just-hysteria
 
It is unlikely that Kavanaugh would vote to take away their Second Amendent rights.
 
It is unlikely that Kavanaugh would vote to take away their Second Amendent rights.

Funny you should raise that issue since Kavanaugh seems to feel that any restriction guns rights including firearms restrictions and background checks are unconstitutional. RPGs for everybody. Yay!
 
It is unlikely that Kavanaugh would vote to take away their Second Amendent rights.

Funny you should raise that issue since Kavanaugh seems to feel that any restriction guns rights including firearms restrictions and background checks are unconstitutional. RPGs for everybody. Yay!

Wow. A jurist who belives that liberty means liberty. That monster.
 
It is unlikely that Kavanaugh would vote to take away their Second Amendent rights.

Funny you should raise that issue since Kavanaugh seems to feel that any restriction guns rights including firearms restrictions and background checks are unconstitutional. RPGs for everybody. Yay!

Wow. A jurist who belives that liberty means liberty. That monster.

He's supposed to believe in the constitution and the constitution doesn't say that.
 
Wow. A jurist who belives that liberty means liberty. That monster.

He's supposed to believe in the constitution and the constitution doesn't say that.
Also, it's 'funny' how all of these so called constitutionalists ignore the 9th and 10th amendments.

I'm not sure if there's any case law where the 9th or 10th are cited in over 200 years of jurisprudence. :(
 
The 2nd amendment needs to be removed. In the absence of that very unlikely happenstance, it should be enforced.....words 2 and 3 are never actually implemented, and are actively resisted by gun loons.
 
It is unlikely that Kavanaugh would vote to take away their Second Amendent rights.

Funny you should raise that issue since Kavanaugh seems to feel that any restriction guns rights including firearms restrictions and background checks are unconstitutional. RPGs for everybody. Yay!

Wow. A jurist who belives that liberty means liberty. That monster.

No, a judge who doesn't understand the Constitution, the law, or basic logic. He should be disbarred and removed from any bench, not promoted to the highest bench.
 
It would be fun to dig up James Madison and tell him "basic logic" makes it clear he wrote a Constitution that protects the right to abortion but not the right to bear arms.
 
Back
Top Bottom