peacegirl
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2024
- Messages
- 636
- Gender
- Female
- Basic Beliefs
- I believe in determinism which is the basis of my worldview
You have explained nothing. You have asserted a bunch of stuff that is not only at variance with physics, but at variance with logic itself.And I have explained to you that this has nothing to do with faster than light speed. It has nothing to do with light speed at all. All of this has been previously explained to you.
I it is not at variance with physics or logic. It is your modal logic that is T variance with reality.
This is entering the realm of science-fiction because you and I both know that this doesn't mean we would see events before their cause. After all that I have explained, you still think that light has to travel to reach the eye, which explains your logic. This is the logic that scientists have used to conclude we see in delayed time. But it's not true because efferent vision allows us to see the object instantly due to light being a condition, not a cause. It's the opposite of what scientists have asserted.The key is not faster than light speed, but rather faster than light signaling. If the sun is “at the eye” instantly, whatever that is even supposed to mean, you have received information faster than light. Relativity theory forbids this, and in such a world we would see events before their causes.
How is that possible if the Sun is 93 million miles away? The Sun is too far away from Earth for us to burn up.Actually, in such a world, we’d see nothing at all, because the surface temperature of the earth would be about that of the sun and no living things would exist. We explained that to you, too.
Read the damn chapter Pood. You haven't read any of the book, let alone the chapter: Words: Not Reality, and you know it. Be honest for once.Note; “Because of the way the eyes work” is NOT an answer.