Koyaanisqatsi
Veteran Member
I'm always a bit perplexed by Christians at this point in the discussion, though. Because IF the fetus is a soul and IF it is aborted before becoming a baby and being born, THEN the fetus gets the unequivocally fantastic gift of being created and going straight to heaven, where there is, I've been told, no pain or suffering.
So then if we use the commutative property, you are saying that the thing this fetus doesn't get to experience is... suffering. And you want very much for it to get a chance to suffer like all the other humans. Don't want to "lose that opportunity."
Straight tickets to heaven and wrong and bad and unfair. That's what I feel like I'm hearing from you.
I never did understand why Christians get so upset about souls making it to heaven without any earthly suffering. That plumb flummoxes me. But it is a remarkably strident objection to abortion. "Little Jane didn't get a chance to suffer in an earthly body, and she should have."
All of this. Ultimately, it's a combination of horrific jealousy and exoneration. They didn't get a choice, so (a) no one should and (b) it must therefore be the greatest thing since sliced bread to exist, or else their god is a cruel and amoral monster and their entire lives are pointless. Their god forced them to be born and to suffer so therefore being born and suffering must be axiomatically a good thing so therefore force every pregnant women to give birth or else their beliefs are dogshit and they'll have to face the abyss they so desperately hide from.
That and women are property, so punish them for thinking they can have their own autonomous agency.
