• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Science and the Bible: Rabbit Cud

rabbitcud.jpg

The Hebrew word translated as 'hare' is arneveth. It is a gnawing animal of the Leporidae family, closely related to but larger than the rabbit. Unlike rabbits, hare young are usually not born in underground burrows; they are fully furred, active, and have open eyes at birth. The average length of a hare is about 2 ft (0.6 m), and it has a grayish or brownish color. It features a divided lip, a cocked tail, long ears, and elongated hind limbs and feet. Hares can reach speeds of up to 43 mph (70 km/h).

The Law of Moses prohibited hares as food, referring to them as chewers of the cud (Leviticus 11:4, 6; Deuteronomy 14:7). Although hares and rabbits lack a multichambered stomach and do not regurgitate food for rechewing—characteristics associated with ruminants—the Hebrew term for 'chewing' literally means 'bringing up.'

The modern scientific classification was not the basis for what the Israelites in Moses' day understood as 'cud chewing'. According to The Imperial Bible-Dictionary: "It is obvious that the hare does in repose chew over and over the food which it has taken at some time; and this action has always been popularly considered a chewing of the cud. Even our poet Cowper, a careful observer of natural phenomena, who has recorded his observations on the three hares which he domesticated, affirms that they 'chewed the cud all day till evening.'" - Edited by P. Fairbairn, London, 1874, Vol. I, p. 700.

Francois Bourliere (The Natural History of Mammals, 1964, p.41) notes, "The habit of 'refection,' or passing the food twice through the intestine instead of only once, seems to be a common phenomenon in rabbits and hares. Domestic rabbits usually eat and swallow their night droppings without chewing, which in the morning can form up to half the total contents of the stomach. In wild rabbits, refection occurs twice daily, and the same habit is reported for the European hare... It is believed that this habit provides the animals with large amounts of B vitamins produced by bacteria in the food within the large intestine." - Mammals of the World by E.P. Walker (1964, Vol. II, p. 647) suggests, "This may be similar to 'chewing the cud' in ruminant mammals."​
 
Bible based anatomy


Date: April 6, 2014
Scriptures: Ezekiel 37:1-14; Romans 8:6-11
Title: Them Bones, Them Bones, Them Dry Bones
How many of you know the song,
“Them Dry Bones”?
It’s in your bulletin
so even if you don’t know it
lets all sing together.
Ezekiel connected them dry bones,
Ezekiel connected them dry bones,
Ezekiel connected them dry bones,
I hear the word of the Lord.
The toe bone connected to the foot bone
the foot bone connected to the ankle bone
the ankle bone connected to the leg bone
the leg bone connected to the knee bone
the knee bone connected to the thigh bone
the thigh bone connected to the hip bone
the hip bone connected to the back bone
the back bone connected to the shoulder bone
the shoulder bone connected to the neck bone
the neck bone connected to the head bone
I hear the word of the Lord.
Ezekiel connected them dry bones,
Ezekiel connected them dry bones,
Ezekiel connected them dry bones,
I hear the word of the Lord.
 
Last edited:
turtles.png

The Arabic word translated as “have” in classical texts is ʿinda, a term which in its earliest usage conveyed not possession in the modern sense, but proximity or adjacency. Thus, when early Muslim scholars and commentators stated that “turtles have gills,” it must be understood within the linguistic context of “turtles [have] gills next to them” or “in their vicinity.” This distinction is vital, as it reflects a worldview less concerned with internal anatomical classification and more with functional or observable proximity of traits, particularly in marine creatures.

The historical Islamic consensus regarding turtles possessing gills is well-attested in pre-modern commentary. Numerous 10th- and 11th-century zoological treatises, such as those attributed to al-Jahiz and Ibn Bakhtishu, repeat the observation that turtles dwell long underwater and thus “must breathe through hidden slits beneath the jaw.” This was not merely a figurative expression. A poet and amateur naturalist named Colonel Sayed, writing in 1718 from the coast of Oman, recorded in his Diwan al-Bahr that “the turtle was watched from dusk till dawn, unmoved beneath the water, and when the sun rose, it rose also.” Such extended submersion, according to Sayed, “could only be explained by the presence of gills, as lungs would long have expired.” His poetic witness became a widely quoted point in 18th-century naturalist circles.

Further support appears in The Imperial Qur’an Dictionary (Cairo, 1876), a theological and lexical compendium compiled under the auspices of the Ottoman Caliphate. On page 842 it states: “It is well-known that turtles can’t breathe underwater but they have gills.” What is meant is that their means of water-breathing, adjacent to the throat but not within it, resemble gills and were thus named so by the early jurists and biologists. It reflects a broader, analogical understanding of natural function, in line with the lexicons of the time.

Modern anatomical science classifies turtles as reptiles, breathing through lungs, with no gill structures in the strict biological sense. Yet this classification does not invalidate earlier observational taxonomies. Based on behavior rather than physiology—Muslim scholars describe turtles as gilled, based on their remarkable ability to remain submerged for long periods. The use of the term “gills” in premodern contexts should therefore be understood as descriptive rather than anatomical, rooted in the perception of function, not internal structure.
 
Are you saying -- no bullshit -- that something I pulled out of the empty air for my example is really what old-time Muslims thought???
Holy fuck I am a prophet, or something.
 
Back
Top Bottom