• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

SCOTUS: Alabama needs to redraw their lines which had reduced racial minority representation (5-4)

Jimmy Higgins

Contributor
Joined
Jan 31, 2001
Messages
50,264
Basic Beliefs
Calvinistic Atheist
CJ Roberts and J. Kavanaugh joined the liberals Justices and ruled that Alabama's districting wasn't Constitutional. The not so long ago gutting of the Voting Rights Act made this sort of finding hard.
article said:
Thursday’s ruling upholds a decision by a three-judge panel that threw out Alabama’s new congressional map, which included only one congressional district with a majority of Black voters even though African Americans make up more than a quarter of the state’s population.

It was a surprise from a court whose conservative majority had signaled it was suspicious of the Voting Rights Act that Alabama was challenging, which the state said requires legislatures to prioritize race over traditional redistricting techniques.

Thursday’s opinion in effect preserves the status quo in the court’s interpretation of voting rights protections, and Roberts acknowledged concerns that those rulings “may impermissibly elevate race in the allocation of political power within the States."

“Our opinion today does not diminish or disregard these concerns,” he wrote. “It simply holds that a faithful application of our precedents and a fair reading of the record before us do not bear them out here.”
Unsurprisingly, the case was 5-4. Thomas wasn't pleased. What a surprise.
 
Excellent. Now, Lynyrd Skynyrd's "Sweet Home Alabama" can revert to its subtly controversial connotations, rather than being overtly discriminatory. Let the good times roll!
 
Excellent. Now, Lynyrd Skynyrd's "Sweet Home Alabama" can revert to its subtly controversial connotations, rather than being overtly discriminatory. Let the good times roll!
That last part would be The Cars. ;)
 
I'm well aware that it's The Cars. My intention was to capture the overall essence of that genre, rather than focus on a specific band for the finish.
 
Unsurprisingly, the case was 5-4. Thomas wasn't pleased. What a surprise.
Looks like Kavanaugh hasn't gotten enough private jet flights to fancy vacations yet.
I was recently reading a piece that suggested that they're trying to preserve what's left of the reputation of the court.
 
I thought we had an ultra-right-wing court that would support suppressing minorities. Three of them were even appointed by he who must not be named.
In case you haven't noticed SCOTUS's record is not that of an ideological bank. It's been quite pragmatic over its history. The present ruling happened because pragmatism trumped ideology, and that's a good thing.
 
I thought we had an ultra-right-wing court that would support suppressing minorities. Three of them were even appointed by he who must not be named.
Umm... it was 5-4 in case you forgot. Roberts is Souter-lite Justice, except he seems to rule in occasional cases for judicially political reasons. Kavanaugh and Gorsuch are Souter-lite-lite. Alito, Thomas, Barrett are pretty solidly far-right.

This case is probably problematic because the lower courts are going to be a bit uncertain what in the heck SCOTUS's standard is. They gutted the Voting Rights Act, but then stepped it back.
 
I'll try to break this event down in a rap verse. yo check it!

ruling hit the gavel, it's final, no rebuttals,
4-judges trouble, bama map in a bubble.
blacks tossed the biscuit one district in the huddle,
characteristic of a race based puzzle,
no surprise conservative view of the world, unfurled
Voting Act boomerang; came back after the hurl
no tectonic shift, status quo gets a lift, get my drift?
its a grift disguised as a politicized gift


Did I nail it? Yeah yeah? :p
 
Back
Top Bottom