laughing dog
Contributor
F
Whether something is actionable or not according to your interpretation of the law is not the issue. The issue is whether the law will embolden snowflakes to take action. Whether that action winnable is not relevant - it is the threat of action or the actual lawsuit that people are referring to. Most school districts do not have the resources to waste on dealing with lawsuits or community fallout from such actions.
But hey, don't let that stop your defense of these grandstanding laws designed to intimidate teachers, principals, superintendents and school boards because it conforms with your "religious" views.
A better question is do you even read the comments to which you respond?So are you simply refusing to quote the provisions that would back up your claim "This law allows truthful complaints of uncomfortableness to be actionable in a court of law."? Or are you under the impression that you already satisfied your burden of proof? You did not. Neither you nor anyone else in this thread has produced a shred of evidence that SB 148 makes uncomfortableness actionable. You appear to believe it only because it's endlessly repeated in the left-wing echo chamber.There is no provision in this law for court and punishment. That's in the law it's amending.Quote the provision that allows that.This law allows truthful complaints of uncomfortableness to be actionable in a court of law.
A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to individual freedom; amending s. 3 760.10,Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 37 38 Section 1. Present subsections (8), (9), and (10) of 39 section 760.10, Florida Statutes, are redesignated as 40 subsections (9), (10), and (11), respectively, and a new 41 subsection (8) and subsection (12) are added to that section, to 42 read:
But it's worse than that. The text of the bill has been linked upthread. Assuming for the sake of discussion that the law it's amending has a bunch of provisions it's too much trouble for you guys to bother citing, making various wrongdoings actionable that theoretically could have uncomfortableness added to their lists, you can't even point out a provision of SB 148 that might be adding uncomfortableness to some list of actionable wrongdoings. Did any of you folks even read the bill before you decided you knew what it allows to be actionable?
Whether something is actionable or not according to your interpretation of the law is not the issue. The issue is whether the law will embolden snowflakes to take action. Whether that action winnable is not relevant - it is the threat of action or the actual lawsuit that people are referring to. Most school districts do not have the resources to waste on dealing with lawsuits or community fallout from such actions.
But hey, don't let that stop your defense of these grandstanding laws designed to intimidate teachers, principals, superintendents and school boards because it conforms with your "religious" views.