Arctish
Centimillionaire
We've been over all this already.
You can't use religion as the basis for a claim to an ancestral homeland.
Kate Capshaw is Jewish, but the area around Jerusalem isn't her ancestral homeland. Her ancestors are European. Her husband is Jewish and while he has mostly Canaanite Hebrew ancestry, he also has some European ancestry. Their children are Jewish and can claim _some_ Canaanite Hebrew ancestry, but their claim to the Jerusalem area as their homeland is nowhere near as strong as that of a person with _only_ Canaanite Hebrew ancestry.
The author of that linked article appears to think there's some confusion about Jews having originated in the area. There isn't. It's just that like it or not, Jews aren't the only ones descended from the ancient Hebrews.
Biblical scholars use the term Hebrews to designate the descendants of the patriarchs of the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament)—i.e., Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (also called Israel [Genesis 33:28])—from that period until their conquest of Canaan (Palestine) in the late 2nd millennium bce.
Hebrew | people | Britannica.com
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hebrew
Archeologists use the term Canaanite to indicate the indigenous population of the Levant in ancient times. Hebrews were one of several ethnic groups within the larger group called Canaanites, which is why I have been using both 'Hebrew' and 'Canaanite' to describe the particular ancestry we are discussing.
I realize you have a hard time confronting the fact that a lot of Jews living in the Jerusalem area accepted Jesus as their Lord and Savior over the past 2,000 years, and a lot of Jews and Jewish-descended Christians came to believe that there was but One God and Mohammad was His Prophet. Well, it happened so maybe you should just accept it and move on.