Considering the accusations are based on timed leaks which are vague and unsubstantiated, it would be better to get an impartial person or team to investigate the validity the the various claims that exist.
You know we can do both, right?
Journalists bring the smoke to people's attention, then investigators look to see if there's substance behind the story.
Those which are unsupported with specific and actual facts can be officially closed out. So far no conclusions are possible on any of the accusations so there is no need at this stage to involve a prosecutor.
I'd say you're wrong.
You're pretending that the only information available on any accusation is the stuff that's been published. You ignore the investigations that do not publish their findings in advance of prosecution because they're not supposed to.
The question of whether or not a prosecutor is necessary needs to be made by people with access to the actual investigations, not people reading news stories about some leaks.
Certainly the one regarding Russian secrets seems to have largely deflated.
Fingers crossed, WP. Or maybe they just have all realized the stakes involved and the leaks have cut themselves down. Or maybe people who were making leaks are saving it for the book they're going to publish in 2018.
Given the timing of orchestrated media attacks
I don't see all that much coordination. Looks more to me like Trump and everyone around him is in over their head and everything they fucking do is noteworthy.
Are there any co-conspirators involved and is the objective a coup?
Occam's razor would suggest we don't need a conspiracy if we can explain everything by Trump and his posse being the political equivalent of a monkey fucking a football in an aquarium under a strong light.
So far it seems that any investigation is for a prosecutor to raise things to impeachment level. This cannot be done on the basis of half baked assertions.
You keep saying this.
You keep being wrong.
If enough votes are there, they can impeach for half-baked assertions. They can impeach for Miss Cleo reading Donald's horoscope on CNN. They can impeach for his not being able to tell the same story twice in a row to defend any action he's taken.
They can impeach for his hairdo, if they want.
