• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Some thoughts on what happened yesterday, 8 November

SimpleDon

Veteran Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
3,312
Location
Atlanta, USA
Basic Beliefs
Social Justice
Some thoughts on what happened yesterday, 8 November

Containing no analysis of voting patterns, no recriminations for the failed campaign or for the media, no mention of emails or sexual abuse, no celebration or remorse.

Georgia became a pseudo-swing state in the last week of the campaign so we got to see the two candidates final advertising. Trump's final ad was quite powerful and effective in my view. And I agreed with it, although I didn't vote for him.

It wasn't anti-Muslim, or about building a wall to keep out criminals. It was anti-globalization, anti-trade treaty and anti-deindustrialization. Although I doubt that anyone in the Trump campaign would think of in this way it is anti-neoliberalism meaning it is pro-labor, pro-wages, anti-profits and anti-wealth. It is the highest irony that this came from a wealthy man endowed at birth with his wealth running at the head of the Republican party, the party that is responsible for the policies that he disavowed.

Nothing will come of it of course. Neoliberalism is the lifeblood of the Republican party. Whoever crafted this advertisement probably viewed it as good politics, not as policies that would have any part of Trump's administration.

It really is a shame. Just like the Brexit it might even be worth the turmoil if we could start pulling back from these destructive neoliberal economic policies, they caused the Great Recession, they instituted ever increasing income and wealth inequality as permanent policy and ironically, they went a long way toward giving us this psychotic bigot as president.

But it does ring true to the workers who have been hurt by these policies designed to reduce wages to increase the profits and the incomes of the already wealthy. It is a shame that the Democrats couldn't have adopted some of this message, which of course, was Bernie's platform. </recrimination. I Trumped; ie I lied>
 
The chickens have elected the fox to manage the henhouse.
Neolibral, reaganomic, free trade policies are the cause of the economic stagnation and popular disaffection, not the remedy.

I think Michael Moore's analysis is pretty reasonable:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKeYbEOSqYc

The enemy of my enemy...
 
That's the irony. Middle Americans can no longer deny that globalisation and so-called "free trade" is hurting them. But their self-image as the anti-big gubmint, free-trading people is just too deeply embedded. So they need their protectionism and state interventions repackaged as an American brand of capitalism. And only an arch capitalist - a reality TV caricature capitalist - can get away with that. Not a Bernie socialism alert!! Sanders. Not a big-gubmint insider like Hillary more-of-the-same Clinton.

Not that the Donald can or intends to actually deliver that contradiction, but perhaps middle America is getting the Donald it deserves - like little England is getting the Brexit it deserves.
 
I think Trump was the best choice out of 2 unpopular leaders. I think his spending will be very high and increasing the debt just like the others.
Illegal immigration needs to be controlled without calling racist. If he builds a wall, he needs to flood the tunnels.

The Chinese government is subsidizing its steel makers and has been flooded the US market with goods below the manufacturing price in the name of 'free trade.'

He needs to meet Putin to cooperate first on the global war against extremistm. Later maybe they can discuss trade and mutual cooperation.
 
I think Trump was the best choice out of 2 unpopular leaders.

Except he clearly wasn't.

I think his spending will be very high and increasing the debt just like the others.

Definitely will be since his ideas are all pie in the sky and costly.

Illegal immigration needs to be controlled without calling racist. If he builds a wall, he needs to flood the tunnels.

Wait, Trump says Mexico is going to build the wall. I wouldn't hold my breath on that.

The Chinese government is subsidizing its steel makers and has been flooded the US market with goods below the manufacturing price in the name of 'free trade.'

Why would Trump do that? He benefits from that.

He needs to meet Putin to cooperate first on the global war against extremistm. Later maybe they can discuss trade and mutual cooperation.

First Trump said he's going to countersue all the women accusing him of rape, then he has to testify in the lawsuits against his colleges, then who knows what the investigation into his Foundation is going to discover?
 
Back
Top Bottom