hinduwoman
Member
I am finding this report hard to believe
He did not understand that what he was doing is a crime. The judge just put him on good behaviour.
Surely that alone cannot be an acceptable reason to excuse this man; even in India that is not considered to be a valid excuse.
Can someone get hold of the actual judgement?
A 32-year-old man accused of stalking two women in Australia has escaped conviction after arguing he was influenced by Bollywood movies to believe that doggedly pursuing a woman would eventually cause them to fall in love.
The court in Hobart in the state of Tasmania said it would not record a conviction against Sandesh Baliga, citing his cultural background.
Mr Baliga arrived in Australia three years ago from India and was accused of stalking one woman for 18 months and another for four months in 2012 and 2013.
The court heard that Mr Baliga, a security guard who arrived in Australia to study accounting, repeatedly texted, called and approached the women after a chance meeting with each and he had begun referring to himself as their boyfriend.
Local magistrate Michael Hill accepted Mr Baliga's claim that his cultural background helped to explain his failure to appreciate the seriousness of his behaviour.
He did not understand that what he was doing is a crime. The judge just put him on good behaviour.
Surely that alone cannot be an acceptable reason to excuse this man; even in India that is not considered to be a valid excuse.
Can someone get hold of the actual judgement?