Cheerful Charlie
Contributor
remez,
Would you go over each of those five arguments with me individually? That a way I will know exactly where you are coming from and not bring some other well meanings persons misuse or misrememberance to the table. If you want we can do it in pm.
Probably not, no point in doing so. Its easy enough to understand as none of these arguments are new.
The basic argument, God is transcedent and created all de novo is basic theological dogma, all else derives from that directly or indirectly. All the rest is meant to bolster that claim, directly or indirectly. As science demonstrates that no god is needed to explain the physical Universe, theology tries to undermine that claim. Theological dogmas from revelation create problems for the concept of God, the notion of natural religion does not do much better.
Everybody on this forum seems to know this so no need to do the wall of text crap to support the basics at length.
The basic claims made about God soon cause contradictions and problems for the concept of God. Nothing really to argue about here.