That's just something the Tea party says.
I was adding the two other tenants of the Tea Party. This whole 'adhere strictly to the constitution' can't be done quite perfectly without the aforementioned ignoring of 240 years of Constitutional Law history.I haven't the foggiest idea of what point you are trying to make with this post.
- - - Updated - - -
No, BB is talking about the original Tea Party just before 2009. Back then it comprised of nearly 200 Ron "the king maker" Paul fanboys and they got together and had a demonstration that no one noticed.What does any of this have to do with the Tea Party? Jindal was not a Tea Party endorsed candidate. As far as I know he has no affiliation with the Tea Party. What Tea Party groups have even taken positions on the issues raised here? Of course, anyone can organize and put "tea party" in their name, but I don't believe that the major Tea Party groups have positions on these issues.
The major principles of the Tea Party movement are 1. balance the budget and 2. adhere strictly to the constitution. I'm not aware that they take any position on more particular issues like birth control or sex education or the confederate flag or countless other issues that clog the mainstream media.
So you are saying that Tea Party Republicans don't have a position on the issues mentioned in the OP?
This "movement" was then hijacked by the radicals in the Republican party to create a "grassroots" Fox News protest.
I'm not aware of the various Tea Parties taking a position on most of the issues attributable to Jindal in this post. It's sort of like blaming the Occupy Wall Street movement for California's debt problem because Jerry Brown and Occupy Wall Street are in the rough general area of each other political philosophy.
I'm not aware of the various Tea Parties taking a position on most of the issues attributable to Jindal in this post. It's sort of like blaming the Occupy Wall Street movement for California's debt problem because Jerry Brown and Occupy Wall Street are in the rough general area of each other political philosophy.
You're right, Jerry Brown and Occupy Wall Street have equally as little to do with California's debt problem, so I'm not sure why anyone would blame either of them. Bobby Jindal rode the Tea Party wave into office, though, and has since implemented policies that align with Tea Party values. Now we are seeing the result of that social experiment.
"A study by the Violence Policy Center published in late January found the state also has the second-highest rate of gun deaths in the nation" - Also see: http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/06/gun_control_bobby_jindal_law.html
Check.
"Additionally, though 16.6 percent of Louisiana residents lack health insurance, one of the highest rates of uninsured people in the country, Jindal refused the federally funded expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, and declined to set up a state-based health exchange. If the Supreme Court rules over the next few weeks against Obamacare’s federal subsidies, as many as 250,000 Louisianans could lose their coverage."
Check.
"At the same time, the governor has given more than a billion dollars each year in tax breaks to wealthy corporations in the film, retail, and fracking industries. "
Check.
So, let's see, anti-gun-control legislation, rejection of the ACA to the detriment of his own constituents, and a billion dollars in tax breaks for corporations leaving the state with deficit problems. These are all Tea Party values in action and, clearly, it is hurting the state. Meanwhile, despite his strange obsession with a rail line that probably very few people will actually use, Jerry Brown has turned deficits into surpluses for the state of California. It was the disastrous policies of Schwarzenegger that led to California's debt problems.