Privilege is a word that I keep seeing thrown around a lot these days, usually by the feminists in my life. Most of the time they use privilege to refer to what you have if you're white, male, middle-class, and able-bodied, but I've seen the concept expand to other things such as 'thin privilege'. The whole conversation seems analogous to some of the threads we've had in the past where people discuss being 'white and male' as the easiest life setting.
As far as I can tell privilege is a concept that's usually used for people to play the victim card against some other subset of society. "YOU HAVE PRIVILEGE AND I DON'T BECAUSE". But I think the reality of privilege is more complex than that. Consider some other concepts of privilege:
Say that we looked at the issue objectively and found every possible trait that could convey privilege, we broke the characteristics of each trait down into granules, and we gave point totals to every trait in an objective way. At that point almost every individual would find themselves on a complicated, multi-dimensional spectrum that would lead to the whole concept being nearly meaningless.
We've agreed that being white confers a lot of points, but that doesn't guarantee life success among all considered factors. We've agreed that being male confers advantage over women, but being female does not preclude life success.
So with that said, what's the point of the concept of privilege at all? Why is it ok to generalize in this way when we're describing positive traits, as opposed to negative traits, and what does this even tell us, if anything? I don't want to go around shouting 'female privilege' and start a men's or white people's rights movement, but it seems ridiculous to me to say something like 'white men' have privilege, when I see destitute white men with no teeth on the bus every day.
What do you think? What am I missing?
As far as I can tell privilege is a concept that's usually used for people to play the victim card against some other subset of society. "YOU HAVE PRIVILEGE AND I DON'T BECAUSE". But I think the reality of privilege is more complex than that. Consider some other concepts of privilege:
- Geographical privilege
- Intelligence privilege
- Appearance privilege
- Ambiversion privilege
- Ability privilege
Say that we looked at the issue objectively and found every possible trait that could convey privilege, we broke the characteristics of each trait down into granules, and we gave point totals to every trait in an objective way. At that point almost every individual would find themselves on a complicated, multi-dimensional spectrum that would lead to the whole concept being nearly meaningless.
We've agreed that being white confers a lot of points, but that doesn't guarantee life success among all considered factors. We've agreed that being male confers advantage over women, but being female does not preclude life success.
So with that said, what's the point of the concept of privilege at all? Why is it ok to generalize in this way when we're describing positive traits, as opposed to negative traits, and what does this even tell us, if anything? I don't want to go around shouting 'female privilege' and start a men's or white people's rights movement, but it seems ridiculous to me to say something like 'white men' have privilege, when I see destitute white men with no teeth on the bus every day.
What do you think? What am I missing?