Did Brietbart feed you that bullshit?
Nope. Did DailyKos tell you?
Many Democrats support allowing the members of the caravan to apply for asylum according to our laws and have their case fairly considered, as well as treat them humanely throughout the proceeding.
Several problems with that.
1. Most, if not all are economic migrants.
2. Sure, many Democrats want that. But many others want to let even the economic migrants in. Even some people on this forum have expressed such opinions.
3. Legitimate asylum seekers, if there are any, could put in the application at a consulate or embassy. They want to enter the US so they can disappear into a sanctuary city or state once their bogus asylum gets denied.
Trump and many Republicians want to break our laws, and you as well, and deny them that opportunity.
What laws are broken if economic migrants, who wish to defraud the asylum system, are denied that opportunity.
CNN loves to propagandize about the Caravan, but even they end up revealing the truth.
We have nothing to fear from the migrant march
CNN said:
Ernesto had recently lost his job and Yesenia was unemployed, and they were afraid of not being able to provide basic necessities for their daughters. Although the couple admitted that it had been difficult to read the news that President Donald Trump would send troops to the border, they hoped to request asylum in the US and prayed that God would help the President understand the hardships they had lived through.
Being unemployed is not grounds for asylum, and yet this couple wants to seek it anyway. That's fraud.
They were not -- in fact, they were representative of the roughly 3,500 migrants of the caravan, of which an estimated 2,300 are children, according to UNICEF.
Fine piece of bamboozling. Take the lowest estimate of caravan size, and highest estimate of the number of minors within it, to erroneously suggest that the majority are minors.
Kayla, like so many others in the caravan, wanted to escape extreme poverty and a country in which daughters like her own were often forced to quit elementary school to work and help support the family.
Also not grounds for asylum.
Paola, 22, a single mother, had traveled from San Pedro Sula, Honduras with her sons age 2 and 3. She left Honduras because she wanted to be able to offer her sons a better life, one in which violent gangs like MS-13 were not a part of their daily reality. Her mother lived in Canada and she hoped to start a new life there.
It's illegal migrants from El Salvador that created MS-13 to begin with.
Their family was among many migrants propelled to move by climate change. They had sold everything except her child's clothes to have money for the journey. They wanted to request asylum in the US, but their dream was to one day return to Tegucigalpa, Honduras and build a house.
Another economic migrant family that wants to fraudulently claim asylum.
Democrats also generally support preventing people from entering the country illegally and are also fine with deporting illegals with a criminal record, as the record of the Obama administration clearly demonstrates.
Obama did some good on deportation front (and made some mistakes as well), but this is no longer Obama's Democratic Party. It is more left-wing, more pro-illegal. The whole point of sanctuary cities is to protect illegals . And since the sanctuary extends to county jails, that protects criminal illegals as well. Sanctuary cities need to go!
Also, many new-Dems have been calling for abolishing ICE.
And no, failure to support Trump's insane and idoitic wall does not mean one is pro illegal immigrant.
Why is the wall idiotic? It is not the only thing we must do - we must make it difficult to fucntion in the US as an illegal which means e-verify and no driver's licences for illegals. But securing the actual border is important as well.
