RavenSky
The Doctor's Wife
The article is very poorly written, in my opinion, but the topic and the author being interviewed are interesting.
https://www.greenbiz.com/article/do-you-work-self-regulating-psychopath
While I have not compared corporations to psychopaths, I have long agreed that the very nature of corporations' duty to shareholders only is at odds with what is good for employees, society at large and the environment.
What do you think?
As a result, corporations emerged as self-governing institutions with the single goal of serving their own interests and those of their shareholders. Bakan’s work does not seek to vilify or analyze the people who run corporations or work for them. He critiques the institutional nature of the corporation as legally created, saying it is an invention that has been imbued with characteristics that, if observed in a human being, would swiftly be diagnosed as psychopathic.
Bakan outlined the characteristics of a psychopath, including: callous unconcern for the feelings of others; incapacity to maintain enduring relationships; reckless disregard for the safety of others; deceitfulness, repeated lying and cheating people for profit; incapacity to experience guilt; failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behavior.
Looking at this list in relation to the excesses on Wall Street, the guiles and machinations of big banks, the environmental record of oil and gas companies, the misinformation campaigns we wrote about in "Climate Cover-Up" and the lies and lack of guilt in the tobacco industry, I began to see Bakan’s point.
"Not only have we created an institution in the image of a psychopathic human being, but we’ve actually conferred personhood on it ... and as a society we’ve given it immense power to govern every aspect of our lives," Bakan said.
Increasingly, corporations have limited legal obligation to be concerned about the environment but are compelled to do what’s best for their shareholders...
Their critical path must be to serve shareholder profits — that’s been the unique nature of the institution and its legal obligations since corporations were first formed. Corporations were first conceived in the late 19th century as immensely powerful tools to attract large sums of capital; they created massive projects such as railroads and more recently airlines and the internet. They were mighty, effective investment capital vehicles, and they were constrained so they would not cause more harm than good.
Beginning in the 1930s "there began to develop a robust regulatory system and regulatory state," Bakan observed, but in the 1980s we began to see a dismantling of regulation, which continues today. "Now the notion is, 'Let’s let the powerful vehicle do its own thing and hope it constrains itself. ... Somehow everything will trickle down and play out, and the market will take care of it so everything will be fine.' Well, everything isn’t fine."
Today’s corporation, as an institution, lacks any intrinsic or internal ability to constrain itself morally or ethically, and Bakan sees this as very dangerous
https://www.greenbiz.com/article/do-you-work-self-regulating-psychopath
While I have not compared corporations to psychopaths, I have long agreed that the very nature of corporations' duty to shareholders only is at odds with what is good for employees, society at large and the environment.
What do you think?