• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

The dustbin of history

PyramidHead

Contributor
Joined
Aug 14, 2005
Messages
5,080
Location
RI
Basic Beliefs
Marxist-Leninist
What ideas do you think will be so firmly entrenched in our thinking that we'll look back 20 years from now and wonder why anybody who denied them was taken seriously? How about 50 years hence? 100?

Or have we reached the pinnacle of society, with just the right amount of tolerance and egalitarianism?

I have a few predictions:

-When prenatal gene manipulation becomes commonplace and widely available, we may consider it inhumane to let the random shuffling of chromosomes largely determine one's physiological makeup.

-LGBT people will eventually be treated no differently than anyone else, and those who hang onto the old prejudices will be thought of as backwards, as we think of the KKK today.

-One day, it may be possible to grow animal meat in labs. When that day comes, our practice of raising animals to be killed for their meat might seem barbaric by comparison.

-Whichever way the climate changes, somebody alive today is going to end up looking stupid in 20 or 50 years.

-Anyone who seriously questions the merits of some kind of universal health care system will not be labeled a moderate, or even a conservative, but a dinosaur.

And a few hopes:

-The electoral system will be reformed, either by getting rid of first-past-the-post or by some other means, and our current era will be remembered as the century of political corruption.

-Most major nations enter a post-religion phase, where instead of it being taboo to discredit someone's religious conviction, it will be taboo to profess it (some European nations are already like this).

-Similar to the above, and extrapolating to many decades, may we one day truly be able to call ourselves post-racial.

It's not a matter of actively silencing the opposition on any of these points, just a seismic shift in how much attention people are willing to afford certain views.

Others?
 
-The electoral system will be reformed, either by getting rid of first-past-the-post or by some other means, and our current era will be remembered as the century of political corruption.
I don't think one can blame the past the post electoral system as being more or less as corrupt as the alternative. If you want to see the other system in its corrupt glory, look at Israel. How the elections take place seems to have an influence on where and when the coalitions are built: In our system, coalitions are built within the two parties. The break-down of the republican party we've been seeing recently shows that the coalition that they had built before is coming apart. In the proportional system, coalitions are built at the government level. I am not sure whether one system or the other poses any advantage.
 
Unviersal health care: it's goign to be a double-edged sword. The poor might get some sort of health care, but at the same time, the available treatments to the rich will increase the gap between the rich and the poor, especially for senior citizens.
 
Unviersal health care: it's goign to be a double-edged sword. The poor might get some sort of health care, but at the same time, the available treatments to the rich will increase the gap between the rich and the poor, especially for senior citizens.

Has this been the case in your country of origin?
 
-One day, it may be possible to grow animal meat in labs. When that day comes, our practice of raising animals to be killed for their meat might seem barbaric by comparison.
Before that comes to pass, i expect that we'll be able to grow large vats of bonemarrow that's never had sexual contact or used illicit drugs, that just sweat perfectly clean O neg blood. Not too much of a social impact. The people who donate blood in order to feel lke they're contributing to society may shift to some other charity or drop all volunteerism. But by then, we may not need so much volunteerism anyway.

We'll just lose the chance to peer pressure bully coworkers into going out to the bloodmobile so we can watch them faint at the sight of blood.
 
Unviersal health care: it's goign to be a double-edged sword. The poor might get some sort of health care, but at the same time, the available treatments to the rich will increase the gap between the rich and the poor, especially for senior citizens.

Has this been the case in your country of origin?
It's a prediction based on how I think medical technology will advance, and how income inequality seems to just get worse. Rich people will have special but expensive treatments, poor people will struggle with universal health care that's being strained by ever-increasing costs. Of course, I could be wrong and maybe some advance will make expensive treatments ever cheaper.
 
-One day, it may be possible to grow animal meat in labs. When that day comes, our practice of raising animals to be killed for their meat might seem barbaric by comparison.

Then people will complain about the 'tang' and the old timers will claim it doesn't taste like REAL fresh meat. And then butchering of animals for consumption will become a luxury market with only rich people being able to eat freshly butchered meat.

Sci-fi books covered this. One book has people paying high dollar to enter a preserve and kill their own meat with only a choice of knives. If it doesn't kill you then your kill will be prepared for your dinner by a professional chef.

I read another sci-fi book with similar situations. Machines had replaced all the mind-numbing menial jobs, but that just made them 'common'. So stores started to advertise that they had REAL people to wait on you. Much like we have this now with the computer voice tree that everyone has to put up with when calling any company ("Press one if you're calling about...") and even now some companies tout that you get to speak to a REAL person if you call them.
 
-One day, it may be possible to grow animal meat in labs.
One day? This is old news. The question is, when will it become cheap enough to be generally viable; and the answer to that is likely this year or next, if it catches on enough to provide decent economies of scale.
When that day comes, our practice of raising animals to be killed for their meat might seem barbaric by comparison.
Perhaps. More likely, once 'real' meat is more expensive than the in vitro stuff, it will become a delicacy, and command high prices, even if the end products are indistinguishable from each other, or the in vitro stuff is typically better than the 'natural' version. This has already happened with 'organic' produce.
 
Whichever way the climate changes, somebody alive today is going to end up looking stupid in 20 or 50 years.

Quite a prediction.

Aliens from a distant galaxy will arrive, or they won't.
 
Assuming optimistic scenario where we don't nuke ourselves. I expect fully synthetic 3D printed food, that means no farmers growing crops at all. OK maybe some fruits.
Genetic disorders will be completely eliminated and health care will be completely free and not really that complicated because for the most part it will be preventive health care. Everyone will be wearing a chip which monitors and correct any abnormal data long before it becomes a problem, no heart diseases, no diabetes, no cancer, just bumps, bruises and broken bones occasionally. Huge corporations in the form they exist today will be gone and most people be "working" more less individually or in relatively small groups, therefore there will be no supermegarich people to support political corruption and democracy will be more direct. Education will be improved to the point where pretty much everyone will be capable to understand that evolution is true and religions are just interesting topic of historical research and nothing more. And women will be able to understand math too :)
 
Last edited:
What ideas do you think will be so firmly entrenched in our thinking that we'll look back 20 years from now and wonder why anybody who denied them was taken seriously? How about 50 years hence? 100?

Others?

When the Death Penalty is mentioned....people will think you're referring to the Good Ol' Days....when epileptics & schizophrenics were burned, at the stake, for being "possessed"....rather than the present....where we've come-up with more-creative ways to murder the mentally-ill.
 
People will look back at early web pages, and marvel that anybody thought the use of brightly coloured text, changes in text size, animated graphics embedded in the text and needless center-justifying could possibly be a good idea.

:innocent1:
 
People will look back at early web pages, and marvel that anybody thought the use of brightly coloured text, changes in text size, animated graphics embedded in the text and needless center-justifying could possibly be a good idea.

:innocent1:

I am wondering if you can understand a person's actually attempting to communicate with you. If you look at Medicine Man's content and not the color of his text, you might find a a sincere person honoring you with his colorful presentations. He puts work into his posts. You object just because you do it differently. At least he is not extremely long winded.

I feel most of the issues we are dealing with today will merely be replaced with equally pressing issues in the future. Today's issues might probably not all remain with us, but some will.
 
People will look back at early web pages, and marvel that anybody thought the use of brightly coloured text, changes in text size, animated graphics embedded in the text and needless center-justifying could possibly be a good idea.

:innocent1:

I am wondering if you can understand a person's actually attempting to communicate with you. If you look at Medicine Man's content and not the color of his text, you might find a a sincere person honoring you with his colorful presentations. He puts work into his posts. You object just because you do it differently.

Of course I understand that people are trying to communicate with me. That is why I feel it is important to let them know when they are failing; and why. Colourful presentations are not 'honouring' anything; they are just (probably inadvertently) mimicking advertising spam, and after several decades of exposure to such rubbish, I have developed an acquired reflex to ignore anything formatted in that way - it registers as an annoyance, but I automatically skip over the content.

If someone who is genuinely trying to communicate is using a methodology that renders the attempt ineffective, it seems unfair not to mention this. I, and at least some others on this board who have raised similar issues, are unable to get poorly formatted messages because the presentation renders them unreadable. If people could see that I was posting, but not what I was posting, I would hope that they would do me the courtesy of pointing this out, rather than letting me assume, incorrectly, that my message was getting across.
 
"I have a dream that my children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their font, but by the content of their character."
 
"I have a dream that my children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their font, but by the content of their character."
shouldn't that be "characters"?
 
Back
Top Bottom