Davka
Senior Member
We win!
USA! USA! USA!



USA! USA! USA!








If we weaned ourselves off war, we could afford socialized medicine, free education through grad school for all, doubling the the numbers of classroom and hospitals in this nation, triple the number of in class eduators and support staff while quadrupuling the salaries of both, get free wifi to everyone, solve homlessness
OR
buy me aBirkin Bag
Either choice would be money well spent.
Where are our free market enthusiasts to defend for profit private enterprise? To tell us that the free enterprise system would provide us with the best and lowest cost health care if it wasn't constrained by all of the government regulations or if not for all of the freeloaders getting rich by suing doctors and hospitals? Is there no conviction among the right that they are right?
Oy! There is no such thing as a "free market". It is like an ideal gas. It can't actually exist in the real world. It is a naive capitalistic utopian ideal that is inherently flawed due to it being completely dependent on all people being fair with one another.Where are our free market enthusiasts to defend for profit private enterprise? To tell us that the free enterprise system would provide us with the best and lowest cost health care if it wasn't constrained by all of the government regulations or if not for all of the freeloaders getting rich by suing doctors and hospitals? Is there no conviction among the right that they are right?
Why would they defend it? We don't have free market health care.
Those are 4 payers not one. And about half is not a whole.I don't see how we could be doing it wrong when we really haven't done it all.
What a ridiculous thing to say. About one half of the medical care in the US is paid for by single payer. Medicare, Medicaid, VA and TriCare.
How is this a failure of a single payer system? It is a failure of enacting one. There is a notable difference.
Oy! There is no such thing as a "free market". It is like an ideal gas. It can't actually exist in the real world. It is a naive capitalistic utopian ideal that is inherently flawed due to it being completely dependent on all people being fair with one another.Why would they defend it? We don't have free market health care.
Those are 4 payers not one. And about half is not a whole.What a ridiculous thing to say. About one half of the medical care in the US is paid for by single payer. Medicare, Medicaid, VA and TriCare.
There was socialist back in the 10's or 20's that once said ~"There is something inherent in the human spirit that makes our cause a pathetic joke." The free market is likewise..I'm not an idealist by any stretch. And I hope you don't think I'm defending them. Socialists play the same game.How is this a failure of a single payer system? It is a failure of enacting one. There is a notable difference.
Oy! There is no such thing as a "free market". It is like an ideal gas. It can't actually exist in the real world. It is a naive capitalistic utopian ideal that is inherently flawed due to it being completely dependent on all people being fair with one another.
And if perpetual motion machines were possible, we'd save a ton on gasoline expenses.If had a pure free market system it probably would work well...
So does our human medical system. The only problem is when you really really have to use it.The veterinary medicine system works well.
Where are our free market enthusiasts to defend for profit private enterprise? To tell us that the free enterprise system would provide us with the best and lowest cost health care if it wasn't constrained by all of the government regulations or if not for all of the freeloaders getting rich by suing doctors and hospitals? Is there no conviction among the right that they are right?
Why would they defend it? We don't have free market health care.
How is this a failure of a single payer system? It is a failure of enacting one. There is a notable difference.
Oy! There is no such thing as a "free market". It is like an ideal gas. It can't actually exist in the real world. It is a naive capitalistic utopian ideal that is inherently flawed due to it being completely dependent on all people being fair with one another.
I'm not an idealist by any stretch. And I hope you don't think I'm defending them. Socialists play the same game. If had a pure free market system it probably would work well, except for the people who die because they don't have enough money. The veterinary medicine system works well.
I'm not an idealist by any stretch. And I hope you don't think I'm defending them. Socialists play the same game. If had a pure free market system it probably would work well, except for the people who die because they don't have enough money. The veterinary medicine system works well.
It is interesting that you are willing to let people die to have a health system that works well. There are a lot of people who believe that letting people die to be indicative of a really poor health care system.
And the keystone of the veterinary system is to intentionally kill those whose treatment is too expensive.
Very well done because their priority is healthcare. But what to do with those who would be motivated by profit?
A private group of physicians saw how to deliver healthcare to everyone at lower cost. This is private enterprise in action. Well done.
But that standard so is any insurer.Those are 4 payers not one. And about half is not a whole.
They are single payers for the population that they cover, the aged, the disabled, the poor, veterans and the military.
You must be sooo proud of your tautological point.The post that I responded to said that we have never done single payer. We have.
Yes, half is not a whole. A non-sequitur. I never said that it is a whole.
Utter nonsense. The veterinary system legally permits euthanasia. Our human health care system allows it sub rosa.And the keystone of the veterinary system is to intentionally kill those whose treatment is too expensive.
I'm not an idealist by any stretch. And I hope you don't think I'm defending them. Socialists play the same game. If had a pure free market system it probably would work well, except for the people who die because they don't have enough money. The veterinary medicine system works well.
It is interesting that you are willing to let people die to have a health system that works well. There are a lot of people who believe that letting people die to be indicative of a really poor health care system.
And the keystone of the veterinary system is to intentionally kill those whose treatment is too expensive.