The Sarah Palin Party

[dismal]

I refuse to participate in any thread which in any way discusses Sarah Palin. Where it not for such threads, I am certain that no one anywhere would continue to mention Sarah Palin at all. In fact, it is apparent to me that the two other threads about Sarah Palin which have recently been posted on this forum are directly responsible for the formation of the Sarah Palin Party, as well as the Sarah Palin memes which have appeared on my Facebook feeds recently. It has come to my attention that Sarah Palin feeds solely upon the mention of her name in any context anywhere by anyone. Therefore, I even refuse to type, or utter the name of She Who Shall Not Be Named (Sarah Palin), as doing so only gives her the power to continue her existence.

So, to sum up, I urge each and every one of you who have participated in this thread (and any other thread) about Sarah Palin to refrain from doing so in the future. Please do not feed the abomination that is Sarah Palin by mentioning Sarah Palin in any context on this forum, or I shall be forced to participate in such threads to show my disdain for those who would mention Sarah Palin.

But then what would we do if some obscure crank on the internet says something about Sarah Palin?

How would we know?

This path seems reckless and ill-considered.

Please keep the threads coming.

 

[AthenaAwakened]

I refuse to participate in any thread which in any way discusses Sarah Palin. Where it not for such threads, I am certain that no one anywhere would continue to mention Sarah Palin at all. In fact, it is apparent to me that the two other threads about Sarah Palin which have recently been posted on this forum are directly responsible for the formation of the Sarah Palin Party, as well as the Sarah Palin memes which have appeared on my Facebook feeds recently. It has come to my attention that Sarah Palin feeds solely upon the mention of her name in any context anywhere by anyone. Therefore, I even refuse to type, or utter the name of She Who Shall Not Be Named (Sarah Palin), as doing so only gives her the power to continue her existence.

So, to sum up, I urge each and every one of you who have participated in this thread (and any other thread) about Sarah Palin to refrain from doing so in the future. Please do not feed the abomination that is Sarah Palin by mentioning Sarah Palin in any context on this forum, or I shall be forced to participate in such threads to show my disdain for those who would mention Sarah Palin.

But then what would we do if some obscure crank on the internet says something about Sarah Palin?

How would we know?

This path seems reckless and ill-considered.

Please keep the threads coming.

and again

 

[KeepTalking]

I refuse to participate in any thread which in any way discusses Sarah Palin. Where it not for such threads, I am certain that no one anywhere would continue to mention Sarah Palin at all. In fact, it is apparent to me that the two other threads about Sarah Palin which have recently been posted on this forum are directly responsible for the formation of the Sarah Palin Party, as well as the Sarah Palin memes which have appeared on my Facebook feeds recently. It has come to my attention that Sarah Palin feeds solely upon the mention of her name in any context anywhere by anyone. Therefore, I even refuse to type, or utter the name of She Who Shall Not Be Named (Sarah Palin), as doing so only gives her the power to continue her existence.

So, to sum up, I urge each and every one of you who have participated in this thread (and any other thread) about Sarah Palin to refrain from doing so in the future. Please do not feed the abomination that is Sarah Palin by mentioning Sarah Palin in any context on this forum, or I shall be forced to participate in such threads to show my disdain for those who would mention Sarah Palin.

But then what would we do if some obscure crank on the internet says something about Sarah Palin?

Well, the obvious thing to do would be to engage them in discussion about how discussing Sarah Palin in any context is only feeding additional discussion about Sarah Palin. That should keep them from ever mentioning Sarah Palin again, as it will provide them with the attention that they so rightly do not deserve for mentioning Sarah Palin.

 

[lpetrich]

An additional party? Let's watch Duverger's law operate and help the Democrats.

But seriously, an additional party on the right could be more useful for getting proportional representation than one on the left. Since the "liberal media" bends over backward to avoid seeming "biased", it will give this party's arguments a *lot* of coverage.