This anti-jewish post reads very similar to anti white male posts by SJWs

[repoman]

http://therightstuff.biz/2016/04/11/zero-tolerance-why-arent-white-nationalists-and-jewish-nationalists-fellow-travelers/

I like at least that the writer is going all out and not shading his views.

This movement is about us, not them. If they are offended by us excluding them, that’s fine. They can be offended. We believe in what benefits Whites, not Jews, and there is no reason for us to take their delicate feelings into account. They sure as hell don’t care about our feelings, nor do they have serious debates among themselves as to whether Whites should have any role in their movements. How silly would it have been for the Zionists to devote time and effort into debating whether they should support European nationalism in the 19th Century? To this day, hyper-nationalist Israel remains one the biggest enemies of European and even American nationalism. This is because Jews are not opponents in a friendly game of chess, but remorseless enemies who seek the destruction of the people they hate, which is us.

We will not stand with Israel because Israel will not stand with us. Since when is an enemy with a powerful ethnostate an ally? The slow-witted conservatives of the counter-jihad movement say we can learn much from Israel. Yes, we can. We can learn that Jews enjoy burning women and children to death with white phosphorus while stating that their enemies aren’t a “real people.” Sound familiar? They say the same thing about Whites, whether we’re in America or Germany. And yes, from Israel’s immigration laws and security apparatus we can learn how to effectively keep racial undesirables out of our nations… especially Jews. Put frankly, anyone who stands with Israel stands against the interests of Whites.

 

[laughing dog]

Do you really expect any sane person to take your OP seriously?

 

[repoman]

This is from the Alt-Right. Whether or not you agree with them, they are a strange new force or just a circle jerk in internet politics.

This is one comment for the article that no one disagreed with:

The ONLY red line the Alt Right should have is Jews. If you name the Jew, you're in. If you won't name the Jew, you're a fag and GTFO.

 

[laughing dog]

I see the answer to my question is "No".

 

[repoman]

Also, I don't like SJWs as do many others here as well. So I was saying that these tough guy Alt-righters are kind of similar to SJWs, except that instead of the white man (for blacks) it is the jew holding these white guys down.

 

[whichphilosophy]

http://therightstuff.biz/2016/04/11/zero-tolerance-why-arent-white-nationalists-and-jewish-nationalists-fellow-travelers/

I like at least that the writer is going all out and not shading his views.

This movement is about us, not them. If they are offended by us excluding them, that’s fine. They can be offended. We believe in what benefits Whites, not Jews, and there is no reason for us to take their delicate feelings into account. They sure as hell don’t care about our feelings, nor do they have serious debates among themselves as to whether Whites should have any role in their movements. How silly would it have been for the Zionists to devote time and effort into debating whether they should support European nationalism in the 19th Century? To this day, hyper-nationalist Israel remains one the biggest enemies of European and even American nationalism. This is because Jews are not opponents in a friendly game of chess, but remorseless enemies who seek the destruction of the people they hate, which is us.

We will not stand with Israel because Israel will not stand with us. Since when is an enemy with a powerful ethnostate an ally? The slow-witted conservatives of the counter-jihad movement say we can learn much from Israel. Yes, we can. We can learn that Jews enjoy burning women and children to death with white phosphorus while stating that their enemies aren’t a “real people.” Sound familiar? They say the same thing about Whites, whether we’re in America or Germany. And yes, from Israel’s immigration laws and security apparatus we can learn how to effectively keep racial undesirables out of our nations… especially Jews. Put frankly, anyone who stands with Israel stands against the interests of Whites.

This is hardly evidence based but simply meaningless drivel.

 

[repoman]

For fucks sake, I am not trying too analyze the truth of their claims but to try and understand the difference sychology behind it.

 

[Sarpedon]

Ok, tell us in what way they are similar. I am not seeing it.

Is it because they claim that Jews are privileged? And that is similar to claiming that white males are privileged? And therefore the idea that white males are privileged must be false? Is that the faulty line of thought you are trying to lead us down?

This is like saying that some people claim that whales are fish because they resemble fish, and this is false. So therefore the claim that the sunfish is a fish is also false, because it too is based on the idea that sunfish resemble fish.

Is it because the feelings of the group in question is disregarded? Is that what you are complaining about? What is it?

 

[Keith&Co.]

This is one comment for the article that no one disagreed with:

The ONLY red line the Alt Right should have is Jews. If you name the Jew, you're in. If you won't name the Jew, you're a fag and GTFO.

How does that compare to SJW rants against white males?
Do SJW's say that if you won't call a white male privileged, then you're gay?
Or do the SJW's make it a racial thing? I mean, someone once noted that i didn't like something Trent Lott said and assumed i had to be a black man.
Someone else took offense at my atheism (not my stance on anything, just the fact i was an atheist) and decided i became an atheist in the same college that made me gay.
And someone else figured if i didn't like how his Church treated women, i had to be a lesbian.

Do SJW's typically claim that not buying into their anti-male rant indicates one's sexual preference? Or race? Or maybe economic status?
Where's the connection here?

 

[Malintent]

How are "Jews" not white? most of the Jews I know are some of the "whitest" people I know... I see no relationship between SJW drivel and this White Supremest drivel. It's all fascism, but entirely different kinds.

 

[Malintent]

This is one comment for the article that no one disagreed with:

How does that compare to SJW rants against white males?
Do SJW's say that if you won't call a white male privileged, then you're gay?
Or do the SJW's make it a racial thing? I mean, someone once noted that i didn't like something Trent Lott said and assumed i had to be a black man.
Someone else took offense at my atheism (not my stance on anything, just the fact i was an atheist) and decided i became an atheist in the same college that made me gay.
And someone else figured if i didn't like how his Church treated women, i had to be a lesbian.

Do SJW's typically claim that not buying into their anti-male rant indicates one's sexual preference? Or race? Or maybe economic status?
Where's the connection here?

I think the reason for this is that the SJWs might be under the impression that all people (not just them) only fight for causes that directly impact themselves... as opposed to fighting the causes that one simply thinks are important for society as a whole to talk about.

 

[Arctish]

I think the reason for this is that the SJWs might be under the impression that all people (not just them) only fight for causes that directly impact themselves... as opposed to fighting the causes that one simply thinks are important for society as a whole to talk about.

Social justice warriors might be under the impression that people fight for what is important to them, as opposed to fighting for what is important to them that is also important for society? That's some mighty fine hair-splitting.

 

[repoman]

Take the case of charities started by famous or wealthy people. I would bet that most of them started because they had a kid with a birth defect or some similar type thing. But not all of them of course.

But I don't think it makes a person better to start a charity for something they have not witnessed up close.