• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Topsy-Turvy world of Religious "Morals"

Ramaraksha

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
667
Location
Chicago, IL
Basic Beliefs
Rational, Down-to-Earth
So, they say the guy who killed 50 gay people recently was himself Gay, but if he is not, all he has to do is to cry some tears of remorse and the ever-forgiving God will forgive him and off he goes to enjoy heaven?

The 50 dead Gays end up in Hell to be tortured forever?

Only in the Topsy-Turvy world of religious "morals" does the above happen

These are the same people who talk about a loving God with one side of the mouth while condemning not just some people but the rest of humanity, we are talking billions of people, women, children, entire families, to a horrible fate! All because we don't share their delusions

If that doesn't bug me enough, the silence from the victims - Atheists, Hindus, Buddhists etc - really drives me up the wall
 
If that doesn't bug me enough, the silence from the victims - Atheists, Hindus, Buddhists etc - really drives me up the wall

Not fair. I suspect the victims are silent because they're dead.
 
So, they say the guy who killed 50 gay people recently was himself Gay, but if he is not, all he has to do is to cry some tears of remorse and the ever-forgiving God will forgive him and off he goes to enjoy heaven?

The 50 dead Gays end up in Hell to be tortured forever?

Only in the Topsy-Turvy world of religious "morals" does the above happen

These are the same people who talk about a loving God with one side of the mouth while condemning not just some people but the rest of humanity, we are talking billions of people, women, children, entire families, to a horrible fate! All because we don't share their delusions

If that doesn't bug me enough, the silence from the victims - Atheists, Hindus, Buddhists etc - really drives me up the wall
Is it fair for me to ask whether this kind of behavior is for people who cannot think for themselves? Has such a non-thinking behavior been selected for?

In the end so long as your "morals" are sufficiently reproductive they will be selected for.
 
If that doesn't bug me enough, the silence from the victims - Atheists, Hindus, Buddhists etc - really drives me up the wall

Not fair. I suspect the victims are silent because they're dead.

The relatives of the dead are victims as well - we as a society are victims as well. Also it is not just gays that they condemn - they condemn ALL non-christians (and muslims do the same thing but now it's all non-muslims) to a brutal hell and we are the victims in this and our silence really bugs me

ISIS was condemned as evil by many - what did they do? The separated people by religion - all non-muslims were given a choice of either conversion or death. The same "deal" that we will get after we die? How is that not evil

And yes not even one of the article writers condemning ISIS as evil ever mention their own religious hatred, and they get away with it, because well, no one speaks up and asks
 
Christians often argue that atheists can't possibly have morals.

This tells us something very important about Christians. It tells us that whatever it is that makes Christians morals is something that atheists can't possibly have. It also tells us that the things that make atheists moral are not anything that inspires morality in Christians. After all, if it were, then they would not argue that morality is impossible for atheists.

Thus we know that the screams and cries of their victims would not be sufficient to stop a Christian from doing unspeakable things to random strangers, and why they cannot understand that most atheists find this a valid reason to not do horrible things to anyone, much less strangers.

We know that the well-being of others cannot possibly motivate Christians to do moral things, and why they cannot understand that most atheists find this a valid reason to be moral.

Whatever it is, it must be something that only people who believe in deities have.

This brings us to the  Euthyphro dilemma, first proposed thousands of years ago. While the argument was originally made about getting morality from gods, the same argument can be applied to any authority. An authority can only demand your obedience, not make you more moral. Authority-based moral systems result in the most extreme and incoherent form of moral relativism imaginable. Under authority-based moral systems, morality is completely arbitrary based on the whims of the "gods" (or to be more precise, the whims of the humans who write the holy books and the humans who stand in the pulpits).

So you must kill people who eat shellfish.

You must kill people who pick up sticks on the wrong day.

You must kill women who are not virgins on their wedding night.

You must kill disobedient children.

You must not eat pork.

You must not eat beef.

You must not eat meat.

You must pray five times per day.

You must have extra funerals on the 1st, 5th, and 10th anniversary of a loved one's death.

You must wash your hands a particular way before you pray.

You must die in battle in a particular way.

You must kill people who leave your religion.

You must disown family members who leave your religion.

You must pray before meals.

You must not eat meat and cheese together.

You must splash water on a baby's head in a very specific way in a very specific ritual.

You must not shave.

You must wear a silly hat with a dagger in it.

You must not eat meat unless the animal has been killed in a particular way.

If you are a woman, you must cover your hair when in public.

If you are a woman, you must cover your hair with a wig when in public.

If you are a woman, you must cover your hair when in church.

You must not eat meat on Fridays, but you can eat fish on Fridays.

You must not sit next to a member of the opposite sex when in public, even if it means delaying a flight for hundreds of people.

Arbitrary. All of it completely fucking arbitrary. That's what happens when you define morality by obedience instead of by the consequences of your decisions.
 
Well it actually makes sense - our ancients lived in a different era - they lived under Kings/Masters - Master is ALWAYS right - whatever master says one must do. Remember that these folks hope to get the good life in Heaven provided by this super being - if your livelihood depended on X - would you not support his every action especially if you had no other choices?

And that is why they can kill and rape with impunity as long as they think Master ordered it - it is a slave/servant mind at work - they are blameless - they are just following orders - that is why when someone says "I am a solider of God" it scares me because i know such a person is capable of the utmost atrocities and still think he is a good guy

That is why if you see a crazy guy on the street yelling he is going to kill his kids, you call the cops and have him locked up but religious people see nothing wrong with a guy ready to kill his son because God ordered him to - the slave obeying his master - that's the right thing to do
 
So, they say the guy who killed 50 gay people recently was himself Gay, but if he is not, all he has to do is to cry some tears of remorse and the ever-forgiving God will forgive him and off he goes to enjoy heaven?

The 50 dead Gays end up in Hell to be tortured forever?

Only in the Topsy-Turvy world of religious "morals" does the above happen

These are the same people who talk about a loving God with one side of the mouth while condemning not just some people but the rest of humanity, we are talking billions of people, women, children, entire families, to a horrible fate! All because we don't share their delusions

If that doesn't bug me enough, the silence from the victims - Atheists, Hindus, Buddhists etc - really drives me up the wall

I don't think Muslims believe in redemption. That's a Christian thing. I'm pretty sure the Muslims believe he is going to heaven because he died slaughtering the enemies of mighty Allah, and therefore he will rise to the right hand of Mohammed and be greeted by 72 virgins for his noble martyrdom.

Sigh.

But whatever the reason, he goes to heaven while his innocent victims go to hell. It's the same thing in either religion. Good thing neither of them are remotely true.
 
Back
Top Bottom