What about the Nigerian people? They seem to be paralyzed. People are eying the presidential elections in February, almost as if they are in a trance, apparently hoping that somehow everything will be different afterwards.
In the meantime, many sling mud at each other in social networks and newspapers and accuse those who have a different faith, or support a different presidential candidate, of organizing the terror. How can they then expect solidarity from the world? With whom or for whom should people in Berlin, New York or Cape Town march in support?
Not only politicians in Europe or the United States, but also in Africa itself appear to be just as perplexed as Nigerian civil society by Nigeria's inactivity.
Faced with fresh terrorist threats against his country, Cameroon's president, Paul Biya, has again appealed for help from the international community. Nigeria's neighbors, which include Cameroon, along with France, the United States, Britain and even China, have repeatedly offered Abuja their assistance.
But only recently the United States reduced its support to the Nigerian military back to a minimum, because Washington did not have the impression that the Nigerian military was serious about fighting Boko Haram. Neighboring Niger and Cameroon seem to have come to similar conclusions.
Therefore, Nigeria has mostly itself to blame if it does not experience any solidarity. This is terrible because it is not the political elites who are paying the price. The price is being paid by a steadily growing number of victims – Christians, Muslims, men, women and children.