• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Trump-Funded Operative CAUGHT Soliciting Illegal Acts to Disrupt Inauguration

 
 
 
Elixir

Elixir

Made in America
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
36,203
Location
Mountains
Basic Beliefs
English is complicated
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwJ1HUEZ5Ds

TYT's Eric Byler (htp://Twitter.com/EricByler) takes you behind the scenes of the counter-sting operation that exposed James O'Keefe, Allison Maass and their propaganda outlet, Project Veritas. Video and audio catch Maass offering to pay money for the incitement of riots at Donald Trump's inauguration.


Is there no depth to which they will not stoop?
 
whichphilosophy said:
Elixir said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwJ1HUEZ5Ds

TYT's Eric Byler (htp://Twitter.com/EricByler) takes you behind the scenes of the counter-sting operation that exposed James O'Keefe, Allison Maass and their propaganda outlet, Project Veritas. Video and audio catch Maass offering to pay money for the incitement of riots at Donald Trump's inauguration.


Is there no depth to which they will not stoop?
Click to expand...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1prkSjPXHs

:)
Click to expand...

Yeah, funny. It should work well, if they can pay enough people enough money to make it look like Hillary had something to do with it...
This entire "administration" is already a corrupt rat-hole of millionaire sleazebags.
 
Elixir said:
whichphilosophy said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1prkSjPXHs

:)
Click to expand...

Yeah, funny. It should work well, if they can pay enough people enough money to make it look like Hillary had something to do with it...
This entire "administration" is already a corrupt rat-hole of millionaire sleazebags.
Click to expand...

Assuming that the video is true, then Maas and accomplices are very likely to have involved in a conspiracy to breach public order.
Criminal charges in such an event would follow automatically but there is no record of arrests in subsequent reports since this would be a serious issue. I checked again today and found nothing.

Further there is nothing to suggest this is originated from the Republican leadership or who was ultimately responsible unless the suspects acted alone.
Aside from this the question would be whether this disorder was a distraction for another event taking place at the same time. It is feasible that a disruption could be a distraction for something else. This is outside of the issue but where there is a disruption; there can a distraction for something else planned. This is pure speculation for something that is not improbable.

In politics there are often several groups attached to main parties. Some are special interest groups.

During the election and afterwards there were several reports and claims against both sides which didn’t amount to much.
 
blastula said:
whichphilosophy said:
Strange as it may seem, when politicians hold press conferences a lot of staff and aides will be present who will support them. They are unlikely to invite opponents.
Click to expand...

No, this is not normal, except maybe in tinhorn dictatorships.
Click to expand...

it's not normal, you say, for employees to make a public show of supporting their employers? Is that what you are saying? really?
 
blastula said:
whichphilosophy said:
Strange as it may seem, when politicians hold press conferences a lot of staff and aides will be present who will support them. They are unlikely to invite opponents.
Click to expand...

No, this is not normal, except maybe in tinhorn dictatorships.
Click to expand...

Opponents can come such as the press. If it means inviting public to an open event then of course there will be a mixed bag.
 
Malintent said:
blastula said:
No, this is not normal, except maybe in tinhorn dictatorships.
Click to expand...

it's not normal, you say, for employees to make a public show of supporting their employers? Is that what you are saying? really?
Click to expand...

No, that's not what I'm saying. Are you not aware of what occasion we're talking about?

- - - Updated - - -

whichphilosophy said:
blastula said:
No, this is not normal, except maybe in tinhorn dictatorships.
Click to expand...

Opponents can come such as the press. If it means inviting public to an open event then of course there will be a mixed bag.
Click to expand...

The press are not opponents. It was not the random public, it was employees. It wasn't a campaign rally, it was a press conference.
 
blastula said:
Malintent said:
it's not normal, you say, for employees to make a public show of supporting their employers? Is that what you are saying? really?
Click to expand...

No, that's not what I'm saying. Are you not aware of what occasion we're talking about?

- - - Updated - - -

whichphilosophy said:
blastula said:
No, this is not normal, except maybe in tinhorn dictatorships.
Click to expand...

Opponents can come such as the press. If it means inviting public to an open event then of course there will be a mixed bag.
Click to expand...

The press are not opponents. It was not the random public, it was employees. It wasn't a campaign rally, it was a press conference.
Click to expand...

Your last point: Are you saying this is a closed conference or an open conference (with security clearance). The press would have their passes etc.
 
Elixir said:
blastula said:
The press are not opponents.
Click to expand...

They certainly are, to the extent that they report the facts. Reality is no friend to Trumples' line of bullshit.
Click to expand...

Reciting the CIA script (aka bleat-sheets) is hardly reporting the facts but sheepish dissemination what they were told.
 
So, if there is actually violence from anti-trump protestors, will it be paid for by Trump supporters?

I
 
repoman said:
So, if there is actually violence from anti-trump protestors, will it be paid for by Trump supporters?

I
Click to expand...

I haven't seen anything as a follow up to this. Given the seriousness of this I thought there would be a follow up. In politics anything is possible but nothing seems to have followed this.
 
whichphilosophy said:
repoman said:
So, if there is actually violence from anti-trump protestors, will it be paid for by Trump supporters?

I
Click to expand...

I haven't seen anything as a follow up to this. Given the seriousness of this I thought there would be a follow up. In politics anything is possible but nothing seems to have followed this.
Click to expand...
What followup? Project Veritass is certifiably untrustworthy. They are actually expected to be so disingenuous. And in general, they seem to know just how far they can go, though their Planned Parenthood stunt did get them into legal trouble.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom