Trump: Russian money launderer

[Loren Pechtel]

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...p-engage-in-extended-massive-money-laundering

The presentation is atrocious but he's got the supporting articles about Trump getting slapped hard over money laundering.

 

[whichphilosophy]

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...p-engage-in-extended-massive-money-laundering

The presentation is atrocious but he's got the supporting articles about Trump getting slapped hard over money laundering.

It is atrocious because it provides no evidence in that article as a stand-alone presentation.

The title of the article is
Did @RealDonaldTrump engage in extended/massive money laundering?

So the writer is simply asking a question.
My answer is there is no evidence either way so far.

 

[Elixir]

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...p-engage-in-extended-massive-money-laundering

The presentation is atrocious but he's got the supporting articles about Trump getting slapped hard over money laundering.

Hardly surprising. Money laundering, sex trafficking... anything to make a buck. That's our PEOTUS. Of course the alr-reality crowd clings religiously to their Precious Tiny Doubt, but anyone who has followed Tiny Hands through the years will find all this to be totally consistent with everything else known about Don the Con.

 

[ZiprHead]

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...p-engage-in-extended-massive-money-laundering

The presentation is atrocious but he's got the supporting articles about Trump getting slapped hard over money laundering.

It is atrocious because it provides no evidence in that article as a stand-alone presentation.

The title of the article is
Did @RealDonaldTrump engage in extended/massive money laundering?

So the writer is simply asking a question.
My answer is there is no evidence either way so far.

Didn't actually read the article, did ya...

https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-fines-trump-taj-mahal-casino-resort-10-million-significant-and-long

 

[Elixir]

It is atrocious because it provides no evidence in that article as a stand-alone presentation.

The title of the article is
Did @RealDonaldTrump engage in extended/massive money laundering?

So the writer is simply asking a question.
My answer is there is no evidence either way so far.

Didn't actually read the article, did ya...


https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-fines-trump-taj-mahal-casino-resort-10-million-significant-and-long

Of course not. It's pretty apparent that he doesn't read stuff that impugns the orange baboon.

 

[ZiprHead]

Of course not. It's pretty apparent that he doesn't read stuff that impugns the orange baboon.

Yeah, it's probably hard to read with your eyes blocked by orange pubic hair.

 

[whichphilosophy]

It is atrocious because it provides no evidence in that article as a stand-alone presentation.

The title of the article is
Did @RealDonaldTrump engage in extended/massive money laundering?

So the writer is simply asking a question.
My answer is there is no evidence either way so far.

Didn't actually read the article, did ya...

https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-fines-trump-taj-mahal-casino-resort-10-million-significant-and-long

The question is still the same:
Did @RealDonaldTrump engage in extended/massive money laundering?

Essentially what this report states is gross negligence in failing to implement AML Laws and report suspicious activity.

There is a difference between (actual) money laundering and negligence in complying with proactive laws to prevent this.

http://www.dfs.ny.gov/about/press/pr1608191.htm
Consent Order Requires Bank to Establish Effective Compliance Controls and to Retain Independent Monitor for Two Years

Financial Services Superintendent Maria T. Vullo today announced that Mega International Commercial Bank of Taiwan will pay a $180 million penalty and install an independent monitor for violating New York’s anti-money laundering laws.


https://www.trulioo.com/blog/happens-businesses-dont-comply-amlkyc-regulations/

AML Fines
From 2004 to 2010, 110 financial institutions in the United States were fined for AML failures, including lack of training. The most commonly publicized penalties for compliance failure are monetary fines. There has been no shortage of media coverage of major financial institutions such as HSBC ($1.92 billion) and Standard Chartered ($327 million) in 2012, and BNP Paribas ($8.9 billion) in 2014. Many other institutions have also been fined for smaller amounts over the years as well.

Besides risks to the institution, responsibility extends to individuals of those institutions. In a recent Thompson Reuters Cost of Compliance survey, a full 60 percent of all respondents expect the personal liability of compliance officers to increase in 2016, with 16 percent expecting a significant increase.

Criminal penalties for non-compliance can include imprisonment. In the UK, failure to disclose suspicious transactions is an offense that could result in a maximum prison term of 5 years in addition to fines. The same is also true in Canada. Prison terms for money laundering offences in the United States are considerably more severe, ranging anywhere from 5 to 20 years, depending on the nature of the offence. Although apparently not as common, the news media has noted cases of imprisonment for money laundering in Spain, the UK, and the US.

AML laws are constantly and correctly being increased but companies are also showing negligence at times in ensuring these are enforced.

 

[Elixir]

Didn't actually read the article, did ya...

https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-fines-trump-taj-mahal-casino-resort-10-million-significant-and-long

The question is still the same:
Did @RealDonaldTrump engage in extended/massive money laundering?

And the answer is still the same: YES, obviously.
His Russian partner was into sex trafficking too.
Prove it's not so, WP. In fact, try to come up with something - ANYTHING - that isn't consistent with both allegations.

 

[whichphilosophy]

Didn't actually read the article, did ya...


https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-fines-trump-taj-mahal-casino-resort-10-million-significant-and-long

Of course not. It's pretty apparent that he doesn't read stuff that impugns the orange baboon.

I thought it was orange orangutan.

​

See my comments before this.

 

[Will Wiley]

Of course not. It's pretty apparent that he doesn't read stuff that impugns the orange baboon.

Yeah, it's probably hard to read with your eyes blocked by orange pubic hair.

I think that comment says more about you than it does about whichphilosophy.

 

[Elixir]

Yeah, it's probably hard to read with your eyes blocked by orange pubic hair.

I think that comment says more about you than it does about whichphilosophy.

...and even more about Don the Con...

 

[whichphilosophy]

I think that comment says more about you than it does about whichphilosophy.

...and even more about Don the Con...

More bleating but enfeebles by the fact that there is no mention of actual money laundering but beaches of Anti Money Laundering Laws which are increasingly involving more strict procedures for the movement of money and transparency of dealings within business and banking institutions worldwide and locally.

If there was money laundering there would be charges made. In this instance these can be added to the CIA's limp sausage claims that the Russians with the tooth fairy and Santa Claus somehow swung the votes against HRC.

There were some asinine attacks on HRC like she was having a stroke when she pulled some expressions or ran a pizza ring.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

...and even more about Don the Con...

More bleating but enfeebles by the fact that there is no mention of actual money laundering but beaches of Anti Money Laundering Laws which are increasingly involving more strict procedures for the movement of money and transparency of dealings within business and banking institutions worldwide and locally.

If there was money laundering there would be charges made. In this instance these can be added to the CIA's limp sausage claims that the Russians with the tooth fairy and Santa Claus somehow swung the votes against HRC.

There were some asinine attacks on HRC like she was having a stroke when she pulled some expressions or ran a pizza ring.

When you get the biggest fine ever for violating the anti money laundering rules it's pretty clear something dirty was going on. The lack of charges simply means they can't prove they were a knowing party to it.

 

[laughing dog]

...and even more about Don the Con...

More bleating but enfeebles by the fact that there is no mention of actual money laundering but beaches of Anti Money Laundering Laws which are increasingly involving more strict procedures for the movement of money and transparency of dealings within business and banking institutions worldwide and locally.

If there was money laundering there would be charges made. In this instance these can be added to the CIA's limp sausage claims that the Russians with the tooth fairy and Santa Claus somehow swung the votes against HRC.

There were some asinine attacks on HRC like she was having a stroke when she pulled some expressions or ran a pizza ring.

There were charges. Hence the fine. Duh.

 

[whichphilosophy]

More bleating but enfeebles by the fact that there is no mention of actual money laundering but beaches of Anti Money Laundering Laws which are increasingly involving more strict procedures for the movement of money and transparency of dealings within business and banking institutions worldwide and locally.

If there was money laundering there would be charges made. In this instance these can be added to the CIA's limp sausage claims that the Russians with the tooth fairy and Santa Claus somehow swung the votes against HRC.

There were some asinine attacks on HRC like she was having a stroke when she pulled some expressions or ran a pizza ring.

There were charges. Hence the fine. Duh.

There were but not for money laundering but violating money laundering laws. The penalties for laundering are more severe.

 

[whichphilosophy]

More bleating but enfeebles by the fact that there is no mention of actual money laundering but beaches of Anti Money Laundering Laws which are increasingly involving more strict procedures for the movement of money and transparency of dealings within business and banking institutions worldwide and locally.

If there was money laundering there would be charges made. In this instance these can be added to the CIA's limp sausage claims that the Russians with the tooth fairy and Santa Claus somehow swung the votes against HRC.

There were some asinine attacks on HRC like she was having a stroke when she pulled some expressions or ran a pizza ring.

When you get the biggest fine ever for violating the anti money laundering rules it's pretty clear something dirty was going on. The lack of charges simply means they can't prove they were a knowing party to it.

Are you serious. This is chicken feed per what I detailed:

https://www.trulioo.com/blog/happens-businesses-dont-comply-amlkyc-regulations/

From 2004 to 2010, 110 financial institutions in the United States were fined for AML failures, including lack of training. The most commonly publicized penalties for compliance failure are monetary fines. There has been no shortage of media coverage of major financial institutions such as HSBC ($1.92 billion) and Standard Chartered ($327 million) in 2012, and BNP Paribas ($8.9 billion) in 2014. Many other institutions have also been fined for smaller amounts over the years as well.

Besides risks to the institution, responsibility extends to individuals of those institutions. In a recent Thompson Reuters Cost of Compliance survey, a full 60 percent of all respondents expect the personal liability of compliance officers to increase in 2016, with 16 percent expecting a significant increase.

 

[laughing dog]

There were charges. Hence the fine. Duh.

There were but not for money laundering but violating money laundering laws. The penalties for laundering are more severe.

And how does one violate money laundering laws without laundering money? It is a mystery.

 

[Elixir]

And how does one violate money laundering laws without laundering money?

Same way you brag about grabbing women by the pussy without admitting to sexual assault - you don't. Laws already don't apply to Trump. Just wait until he's sworn in!

 

[whichphilosophy]

There were but not for money laundering but violating money laundering laws. The penalties for laundering are more severe.

And how does one violate money laundering laws without laundering money? It is a mystery.

Money laundering laws contain procedures to prevent this form of corruption. However one can violate the procedures without laundering.
This relates to failure to keep proper accounts and file reports etc.

https://www.trulioo.com/blog/happens...c-regulations/

Violating procedures on anti money laundering laws such as accounting and reporting isn't money laundering unless actual money was laundered.
A person who keeps improper books does not necessarily mean he is steallng or laundering unless he is doing something else.