• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Trump’s attack on DEI may hurt college men, particularly White men

In any case, college admissions should not be affected by race and gender one way or the other. Men should not be advantaged, but they should not be disadvantaged either.
I especially agree with this.

Admissions should be based on ability and metrics only. Then let the chips fall where ever that leads. Society as a whole benefits when the best fit people are placed in the jobs they are best at. Which usually also means the fields of study they are most interested in.

If that means no white men get in or only all white men get in.... that should be an outcome we should all (including liberals) be able to agree with.

I don't always agree with Trump. But this time he is right and DEI is wrong.
If you ran a marketing firm, would you be satisfied having only white men working for you?
It would depend on what was being sold. IOW, who the target audience
956f065e-e69d-42c4-b687-28e0ae999017_text.gif
Not trying to diminish female achievements but I myself reinvented Spread Spectrum while at university.
I bet I was not alone.
Reinvented or reproduced what someone else did?
I think I clearly wrote "reinvented".
How do you reinvent something?
The wheel used to square until I reinvented it.
 
In any case, college admissions should not be affected by race and gender one way or the other. Men should not be advantaged, but they should not be disadvantaged either.
I especially agree with this.

Admissions should be based on ability and metrics only. Then let the chips fall where ever that leads. Society as a whole benefits when the best fit people are placed in the jobs they are best at. Which usually also means the fields of study they are most interested in.

If that means no white men get in or only all white men get in.... that should be an outcome we should all (including liberals) be able to agree with.

I don't always agree with Trump. But this time he is right and DEI is wrong.

I came across this on another board:
First, you confuse DEI with affirmative action. They are absolutely not the same thing. Affirmative action (before the Supreme Court ruling) focused on proactively including demographic factors to correct past wrongs. DEI's goal is to remove the hidden barriers that minorities, women, people with disabilities, and others face under the old system, and to create an inclusive culture. DEI is about fixing the system, not managing the demographics.

Second, based on my experience as a hiring manager, DEI initiatives are explicitly designed to make the process more meritocratic. You call for a colorblind meritocracy, but if a system overlooks qualified candidates due to bias against their skin color or background, then by definition, it is not colorblind. It is selectively blind to its own biases. DEI aims to find the best possible talent by identifying and eliminating those blind spots.

And why would you think Trump is right or he is being honest? Trump has a long history of bigotry and actively discriminating against black people. DEI gets in the way of his bigotry and discrimination. Do you really think this leopard has changed its spots?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom