Which is what they have done. Note the population distribution of vaccination, note the distribution of whether patients are vaccinated. Of course the woo purveyors will just blame the vaccine for what Covid does to you.
Vaccines, Vaccinations Discussions
- Thread starter peacegirl
- Start date
And it's totally preposterous that 2 + 2 = 4.
And, yes, you should accept any jab unless you're allergic to it, or it's attenuated and you're immune compromised. The reality is by the time they end up on the recommended vaccine list the numbers are extremely in favor of doing it. Anything that wasn't would be recommended for high risk groups, not everyone. (For example, mpox.)
To actually figure out what's valid is a job for experts, none of us are remotely qualified. There are three things you can do, however:I haven't really studied all the shit that you say they put out, so I can't respond to this. If I were put in a position where I needed a vaccine, I would have to do much more research to see which studies are valid and which ones aren't. This topic is making my head spin.
1) Look at what other experts are saying. When garbage is produced it's likely to be called out--specific flaws will be pointed out.
2) Look at the scenario they are claiming. For example, that atrocious myocarditis study the infection risk was considered over three months. Like it was somehow going to magically go away??? (And they had a decimal point error, but that's much harder to spot.)
3) If a bunch of studies saying X have been debunked then your initial assumption should be that any other study saying X is likewise garbage. The purveyors of garbage try to flood the market.
peacegirl
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2024
- Messages
- 3,964
- Gender
- Female
- Basic Beliefs
- I believe in determinism which is the basis of my worldview
Meet all 37 White House ballroom donors funding the $300 million build, including Silicon Valley tech giants, crypto bros and the Lutnicks | Fortune
The list, reviewed by Fortune, did not mention specific dollar amounts offered by each contributor.
I don't believe that he is looking to support woo. I see him as someone who is trying to make our country healthy, and part of that concern is the safety and efficacy of vaccines. He's not an ogre as he's being portrayed. You may not agree with him, but to accuse him of having underhanded motives is going too far.
I thought there was medical help available after a person got rabies. Wow!
Instead of "broader", how about "without bias"? Obviously, there is bias on both sides."Broader" as in total quacks.Yes, I know.This tracks with how major insurance companies have previously responded to recent vaccine policy changes under Trump. Multiple insurance companies and industry associations told PolitiFact these insurers will continue to cover the same vaccines they covered before.
How court ruling on vaccine policy affects insurance
Even as the Trump administration has changed vaccine recommendations, major insurance companies have largely continued to cover vaccines the U.S. government previously recommended. A recent court ruling hasn’t altered that.www.politifact.com
The bigger policy changes haven't happened yet. Didn't you read the article that panel change is __coming__?
I'm not sure what "specialists in recovery" means. Would the vaccine-injured become the specialists on his appointed panel?
Don2 (Don1 Revised)
Contributor
Meet all 37 White House ballroom donors funding the $300 million build, including Silicon Valley tech giants, crypto bros and the Lutnicks | Fortune
The list, reviewed by Fortune, did not mention specific dollar amounts offered by each contributor.fortune.com
(1) Trump has said before someone else will pay for something but lied.
(2) Trump said they wouldn't tear anything down but did. Lied again.
(3) Trump said it would be $200M. He lied or was wrong. Later he said $400M. You should expect that to go up again.
(4) Trump says he is paying for some of it. Where will he get the money? From us. He is suing us for $10B.
(5) One-time construction isn't the only cost: consider sustainability, i.e. maintenance, security, staff, utilities, extra dinners and dances with Kim Jong Un and Putin just because it's there, in perpetuity.
Now the dumb dumbs are going to stop vaccinating the military against the flu. That in spite of many years of study demonstrating that the flu vaccine is very effective at reducing costs and improving readiness by keeping entire units from getting sick at the same time. To quote Dark Helmet, I’m surrounded by assholes.
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2002
- Messages
- 48,277
- Location
- Frozen in Michigan
- Gender
- Old Fart
- Basic Beliefs
- Don't be a dick.
I don't think he really cares whether it is built or not. It's all just another grift, a means to collect bribes from "donors" who have business before the government.Meet all 37 White House ballroom donors funding the $300 million build, including Silicon Valley tech giants, crypto bros and the Lutnicks | Fortune
The list, reviewed by Fortune, did not mention specific dollar amounts offered by each contributor.
(1) Trump has said before someone else will pay for something but lied.
(2) Trump said they wouldn't tear anything down but did. Lied again.
(3) Trump said it would be $200M. He lied or was wrong. Later he said $400M. You should expect that to go up again.
(4) Trump says he is paying for some of it. Where will he get the money? From us. He is suing us for $10B.
(5) One-time construction isn't the only cost: consider sustainability, i.e. maintenance, security, staff, utilities, extra dinners and dances with Kim Jong Un and Putin just because it's there, in perpetuity.
peacegirl
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2024
- Messages
- 3,964
- Gender
- Female
- Basic Beliefs
- I believe in determinism which is the basis of my worldview
I don't understand his motives, but that's beside the point. To expect the public to pay for his entertainment in tax dollars is crazy.Meet all 37 White House ballroom donors funding the $300 million build, including Silicon Valley tech giants, crypto bros and the Lutnicks | Fortune
The list, reviewed by Fortune, did not mention specific dollar amounts offered by each contributor.
(1) Trump has said before someone else will pay for something but lied.
(2) Trump said they wouldn't tear anything down but did. Lied again.
(3) Trump said it would be $200M. He lied or was wrong. Later he said $400M. You should expect that to go up again.
(4) Trump says he is paying for some of it. Where will he get the money? From us. He is suing us for $10B.
(5) One-time construction isn't the only cost: consider sustainability, i.e. maintenance, security, staff, utilities, extra dinners and dances with Kim Jong Un and Putin just because it's there, in perpetuity.
Playball40
Veteran Member
It's like the flu pandemic of 1918 never happened
Ivermectin.
Useful against certain parasites.
"Useful" against some other things in the petri dish. XKCD has the perfect answer on that: so is a gun.
You don't want to understand his motives because that would mean realizing how totally you have been duped.
Those "donors" want favorable actions from the government. He's made it clear you can get that by bribing him.
So? They're not doing this for no reason. They'll get it back.Meet all 37 White House ballroom donors funding the $300 million build, including Silicon Valley tech giants, crypto bros and the Lutnicks | Fortune
The list, reviewed by Fortune, did not mention specific dollar amounts offered by each contributor.
He doesn't believe in the germ theory of disease, why guard against an enemy that does not exist?
150 million saved say otherwise: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)00850-X/fulltext
There is medical help after suspected or confirmed rabies exposure. But there's no test that shows if you were infected. If you're exposed you get the vaccine and perhaps other stuff depending on how far from the brain the infection point is. If the immune system isn't ready to pounce immediately when it emerges from hiding it's too late. There's been one sort-of survivor, much of her mind was gone. It's been tried several other times and not worked.
That's why they often kill the animal that bit you--the only definitive test is examining the tissue for the rabies virus. For some species there are established timelines between a bite being infectious and showing symptoms--for those species if that delay period would be acceptable they wait (rabies treatment is expensive and unpleasant) and see. Anything else, put it down and test it. Animal not recovered, proceed as if it was infected. First world rabies deaths are generally from people who don't realize they were bit. One comes to mind--he was aware of the bat but thought it had simply flew into him.
He's not looking for unbiased people. He's not unbiased, either.Instead of "broader", how about "without bias"? Obviously, there is bias on both sides."Broader" as in total quacks.Yes, I know.This tracks with how major insurance companies have previously responded to recent vaccine policy changes under Trump. Multiple insurance companies and industry associations told PolitiFact these insurers will continue to cover the same vaccines they covered before.
How court ruling on vaccine policy affects insurance
Even as the Trump administration has changed vaccine recommendations, major insurance companies have largely continued to cover vaccines the U.S. government previously recommended. A recent court ruling hasn’t altered that.
The bigger policy changes haven't happened yet. Didn't you read the article that panel change is __coming__?
You're parsing it wrong but that doesn't change the fact that there is no such field.
Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 51,938
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
YEs, today on parasites are not a virus.
peacegirl
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2024
- Messages
- 3,964
- Gender
- Female
- Basic Beliefs
- I believe in determinism which is the basis of my worldview
This memory about COVID still makes me laugh!
His channel is not just about Ivermectin but COVID.
His channel is not just about Ivermectin but COVID.
Don2 (Don1 Revised)
Contributor
I wasn't aware of this, what a moron!
RFK Jr.’s rejection of germ theory debunked in Senate hearing
Kennedy falsely argues that vaccines did little to lower childhood deaths.
arstechnica.com
In a Congressional hearing on Wednesday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) directly confronted anti-vaccine Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on his rejection of germ theory—the unquestionable scientific idea that specific pathogenic microbes cause specific diseases. After Kennedy defended his fringe view, Senator Bill Cassidy fact-checked and debunked Kennedy’s denialist arguments in real time.
The exchanges mark a rare instance in which Kennedy’s dismissal of germ theory has been raised in such a high-profile public setting, in this case, a hearing of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Kennedy, who has no background in science, medicine, or public health, is well known as an ardent anti-vaccine activist and peddler of conspiracy theories. But his startling rejection of a cornerstone theory in biomedical science has mostly been underreported.
-->This is so insane it should be shouted from rooftops!
As Ars Technica reported last year, Kennedy wrote about his germ theory denialism explicitly in his 2021 book The Real Anthony Fauci. In it, Kennedy maligns germ theory as a tool of pharmaceutical companies, scientists, and doctors to promote the use of modern medicines. Instead of accepting germ theory, Kennedy promotes a concept akin to the discarded terrain theory, in which diseases stem not from germs, but from imbalances in the body’s inner “terrain.” Those imbalances are claimed to be caused by poor nutrition and exposure to environmental toxins and stressors. (In his book, Kennedy erroneously labels this as “miasma theory,” but that is a different theory that suggests diseases derive from breathing bad air, vapors, or mists from decaying or corrupting matter. The idea was supplanted by germ theory, while terrain theory was never widely accepted.)
-->What a lunatic!
Kennedy’s embrace of terrain theory over germ theory is foundational to the priorities of his Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement, which promotes notions of healthy diets and lifestyles and clean living. As health secretary, Kennedy has focused on revamping federal dietary guidance, focusing on whole foods (and concerning amounts of saturated fat) while vilifying artificial ingredients and additives. He has regularly posted videos of himself working out on social media. And, with his previous career as an environmental lawyer, he has a long history of fighting against environmental contamination. Kennedy and his MAHA movement have strongly lobbied against chemical pollutants and pesticides, particularly glyphosate (though Kennedy notably shifted on this issue recently, and now supports increasing production of the weed killer, in line with Trump’s policies).
--> Of course. This guy isn't even an ethical lunatic. He has given to the corruption.