Video: explaining different factions of Republican voters

[Underseer]

Ok, to be fair, many Republicans merely argue vehemently against anyone who opposes these groups, but are not necessarily in those groups themselves.

Kind of like how some radical Muslims actively defend the actions of terrorists, but are not themselves terrorists, and they want us to believe that there is a huge difference between arguing against those who oppose the terrorists and being a terrorist themselves.

Similarly, most Republicans actively argue against anyone who opposes white supremacist groups, but demand that you make a distinction between that and actively being members of white supremacist groups. Also, liberals are the "real racists" because we argue against racism, which is the same thing as hating white people, therefore opposing those calling for genocide counts as "white genocide." I am getting really tired of splitting hairs.

 

[zorq]

While the title of your thread may be accurate, I feel it is imprecise. You are trying to blur the line between casual internet racists and active white nationalist groups. And this is an acceptable endeavor because IMO the line is blurry, but your title is blurring white nationalism into the whole Republican Party, which I feel is an unfair broad brushing of one voting block supporting the Republican party into the whole party.

It might be exhausting splitting hairs all the time, but taking the lazy way out and pigeonholing huge groups of people is exactly the mistake that the racists you oppose routinely make.