• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

*Warning: May contain nuts, Christians and/or both

Luke 14
26 If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.

33 So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple.

We have all the bad verses, commands of Jesus. Sell all you have, speak in parables so people will not understand and be saved.
Sit around waiting for the end of the world, take no thought for the morrow.

The false prophecies of the end of the world in the time of Jesus and his followers.

Why would we take any of this nonsense seriously?
 
It really is like watching something falling up for someone as rational as me.


Rational reasons to believe in a god (and later, God)
with help from https://www.everystudent.com/features/isthere.html

The complexity (and perfection) of our planet (and universe) points to a deliberate Designer

If you believe in evolution (that things are just getting better, with nothing behind it), that goes against rationality. As we know, things tend to break down over time - they fall apart. So why would you think that other things would just evolve.

If you put a bunch of car parts on a table, not in a billion years, without some kind of outside logic, are they ever going to just form into a car. And that is supposing that the parts are already there. Where did the parts come from? Isn't it miraculous that all of the elements from the periodic table, that go into forming all this neat stuff around us, isn't it amazing that those building blocks should exist? If there was just a big bang with no intelligence behind it, then ya, maybe (and this is a huge stretch, because I can't even really say maybe), but maybe I could imagine a few inanimate objects - maybe some rocks and or dirt, flying about. But how did all of those elements, that fit so neatly together, do so if there was no rational behind it???


This perfection that we find on earth (it really is a paradise once you scrape off all of man's imperfection) - how did it get to be so awesome? Through survival of the fittest? Did the stars and the clouds and the mountains and the moon compete to be perfectly where they are? No.

Look at the human eye - or any eye for that matter. How did it evolve without knowing that there would be anything out there to see?

Did the proverbial mud puddle just figure out how an eye, or a brain should develop? We humans could never develop an eye. But aren't we humans at the top of the heap when it comes to intelligence? But if we can't figure it out, how did the mud puddle know how to do all this stuff? How did the egg learn to form into a chicken?

The universe operates by uniform laws of nature. Why does it?

Much of life may seem uncertain, but look at what we can count on day after day: gravity remains consistent, a hot cup of coffee left on a counter will get cold, the earth rotates in the same 24 hours, and the speed of light doesn't change -- on earth or in galaxies far from us.

Did God design the laws of the universe - Photo of mathematical equations on a blackboard to illustrate the mathematical consistency of natural laws.How is it that we can identify laws of nature that never change? Why is the universe so orderly, so reliable?

"The greatest scientists have been struck by how strange this is. There is no logical necessity for a universe that obeys rules, let alone one that abides by the rules of mathematics. This astonishment springs from the recognition that the universe doesn't have to behave this way. It is easy to imagine a universe in which conditions change unpredictably from instant to instant, or even a universe in which things pop in and out of existence."11

Richard Feynman, a Nobel Prize winner for quantum electrodynamics, said, "Why nature is mathematical is a mystery...The fact that there are rules at all is a kind of miracle."


DNA
One has to ask....how did this information program wind up in each human cell? These are not just chemicals. These are chemicals that instruct, that code in a very detailed way exactly how the person's body should develop.

Natural, biological causes are completely lacking as an explanation when programmed information is involved. You cannot find instruction, precise information like this, without someone intentionally constructing it.



Is it all just by chance Moogly? Just give a pile of dust enough time and it will all work out?? I find your rationality irrational, but interesting.

The Bible explains what happened. A god (God) created all this.


Here's one more I'm sure you'll like. (from www.everystudent.com/features/isthere.html)

We know God exists because he pursues us. He is constantly initiating and seeking for us to come to him.

I was an atheist at one time. And like many atheists, the issue of people believing in God bothered me greatly. What is it about atheists that we would spend so much time, attention, and energy refuting something that we don't believe even exists?! What causes us to do that? When I was an atheist, I attributed my intentions as caring for those poor, delusional people...to help them realize their hope was completely ill-founded. To be honest, I also had another motive. As I challenged those who believed in God, I was deeply curious to see if they could convince me otherwise. Part of my quest was to become free from the question of God. If I could conclusively prove to believers that they were wrong, then the issue is off the table, and I would be free to go about my life.

God seeks to know us - Photo of sunset on an ocean shore to illustrate the warmth of God's love and desire for us to know him.I didn't realize that the reason the topic of God weighed so heavily on my mind, was because God was pressing the issue. I have come to find out that God wants to be known. He created us with the intention that we would know him. He has surrounded us with evidence of himself and he keeps the question of his existence squarely before us. It was as if I couldn't escape thinking about the possibility of God. In fact, the day I chose to acknowledge God's existence, my prayer began with, "Ok, you win..." It might be that the underlying reason atheists are bothered by people believing in God is because God is actively pursuing them.

I am not the only one who has experienced this. Malcolm Muggeridge, socialist and philosophical author, wrote, "I had a notion that somehow, besides questing, I was being pursued." C.S. Lewis said he remembered, "...night after night, feeling whenever my mind lifted even for a second from my work, the steady, unrelenting approach of Him whom I so earnestly desired not to meet. I gave in, and admitted that God was God, and knelt and prayed: perhaps, that night, the most dejected and reluctant convert in all of England."

Lewis went on to write a book titled, "Surprised by Joy" as a result of knowing God. I too had no expectations other than rightfully admitting God's existence. Yet over the following several months, I became amazed by his love for me.


Yes, you are being pursued right here and now, 2000 years after the Messiah came, he is still reaching out for you.

And one more:

Unlike any other revelation of God, Jesus Christ is the clearest, most specific picture of God revealing himself to us.

Why Jesus? Look throughout the major world religions and you'll find that Buddha, Muhammad, Confucius and Moses all identified themselves as teachers or prophets. None of them ever claimed to be equal to God. Surprisingly, Jesus did. That is what sets Jesus apart from all the others. He said God exists and you're looking at him. Though he talked about his Father in heaven, it was not from the position of separation, but of very close union, unique to all humankind. Jesus said that anyone who had seen Him had seen the Father, anyone who believed in him, believed in the Father.

Jesus Christ reveals God to us - Photo of a man reading the Bible to learn more about Jesus Christ.He said, "I am the light of the world, he who follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life."14 He claimed attributes belonging only to God: to be able to forgive people of their sin, free them from habits of sin, give people a more abundant life and give them eternal life in heaven. Unlike other teachers who focused people on their words, Jesus pointed people to himself. He did not say, "follow my words and you will find truth." He said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life, no one comes to the Father but through me."15

What proof did Jesus give for claiming to be divine? He did what people can't do. Jesus performed miracles. He healed people...blind, crippled, deaf, even raised a couple of people from the dead. He had power over objects...created food out of thin air, enough to feed crowds of several thousand people. He performed miracles over nature...walked on top of a lake, commanding a raging storm to stop for some friends. People everywhere followed Jesus, because he constantly met their needs, doing the miraculous. He said if you do not want to believe what I'm telling you, you should at least believe in me based on the miracles you're seeing.16

Jesus Christ showed God to be gentle, loving, aware of our self-centeredness and shortcomings, yet deeply wanting a relationship with us. Jesus revealed that although he views us as sinners, worthy of his punishment, his love for us ruled and he came up with a different plan. God himself took on the form of man and accepted the punishment for our sin on our behalf. Sounds ludicrous? Perhaps, but many loving fathers would gladly trade places with their child in a cancer ward if they could. The Bible says that the reason we would love God is because he first loved us.



These are some reasons that I believe in the Bible and in God. It seems rational to me and the other 33% of Christians who believe. So when you tell me this all came about by chance, I respectfully disagree.

1I
 
Luke 14
26 If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.

33 So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple.

We have all the bad verses, commands of Jesus. Sell all you have, speak in parables so people will not understand and be saved.
Sit around waiting for the end of the world, take no thought for the morrow.

The false prophecies of the end of the world in the time of Jesus and his followers.

Why would we take any of this nonsense seriously?

Regarding
Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have happened.

If you look at the next verse, it puts it into perspective.

35Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will never pass away.…

So Jesus was not using generation in the usual way, but maybe referring to the generation of mankind, in a broader sense - as broad as when heaven and earth pass away.

Other Christians have their views on it, but that's mine.

I've already discussed the, whoever does not hate his father one... - he was saying in a poetic way that he's, by far, number one. And He is.

Who does not forsaketh everything can not be my disciple. Again - he's speaking in the extreme to make a point. To be perfect, we would have to give up everything that got in the way of our relationship with God. Of course, we don't, but technically, we should (according to the old covenant, which was in place when Jesus spoke this).

Remember - Jesus was as deep as a dude can get, so not everything he said was quickly understood. But the longer one studies his parables, they find deeper meaning.

So, I tried to explain some of the verses that have you perplexed. Maybe I cleared them up, or maybe not, but there are other ways of looking at them, to the point where they are not nonsense, and as serious as it gets - the word of God.
 
I see a holy war coming on.....
1I said:
Wishful thinkers you call us. Yes! And it is great fun.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality of happiness, and by no means a necessity of life." - GEORGE BERNARD SHAW


I agree. My happiness does not add to the argument on whether or not the Bible is credible. But it is a wonderful by-product that, whether or not the Bible is a bunch of hooey or not, will objectively give us Christians a better quality of life than the non-believer. Why? Because we don't have, gnawing through our subconscious, poking through into our conscious with each passing moment, the spectre of death. What a great belief to have. And in addition,we have heaven to look forward to.

So whether or not the key in my hand fits the lock, I have the rock solid belief that it does - and that makes me giddy, necessarily or not.

Do you have the key to facing death? Are you so cool and manly that you tell yourself that it's no big deal? It's the ultimate deal amigo. So, if you do like this thing called existence, there is one necessity, just one, put before us by God - to believe in his Son - who went to the trouble for you and I, unnecessarily, of saving our asses.

Good night amigos

1I
 
Nope. Wrong.

Matthew 24
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

Mark 14
61 But he held his peace, and answered nothing. Again the high priest asked him, and said unto him, Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?

62 And Jesus said, I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

Matthew 26

63 But Jesus held his peace, And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God.

64 Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

All of this was to happen in the lifetime of the high priest at Jerusalem.

Plus other corroborating verses


Matthew 16
28 Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.




Stop trying to bullshit us. This is the Jesus that told his followers to abandon homes and families, to sit around waiting for the end, which was soon, soon, soon. Take no thought for the morrow. See Matthew 6. We have all heard these rationalizations ad nauseum, some of us for decades. There is no truth in any of them.

No, you cannot clear them up because you don't know anything about this except lame apologists' nonsense. the end of the world as we know it was to come about some 1900 years ago, and did not as prophesied.
 
Regarding the rational reasons to believe in God, these have been addressed before again and again. They are quite hollow.

The complexity (and perfection) of our planet (and universe) points to a deliberate Designer

If you believe in evolution (that things are just getting better, with nothing behind it), that goes against rationality. As we know, things tend to break down over time - they fall apart. So why would you think that other things would just evolve.

One of the most humorous things to me about the argument from design is the fact that it is based on the idea that we can recognize design when we see it. Then they turn around and say "and everything is designed." Which means we have nothing to compare design to. But the most damning thing about it is its myopic perspective. It fails to address the question "Who designed the (much more complex) designer?"

Also this contains an obvious strawman. Evolution is not the belief that things are "just getting better, with nothing behind it." :rolleyes:

The use of the word "perfection" to refer to our universe is a baseless descriptor. A perfect universe would not include thousands of children starving to death daily. A perfect universe would not require that animals viciously kill and eat other animals to survive. It would not include ALS. It would not include child abduction and brutality. And these are just a few things on a single planet in a vast universe. I agree that it is complex, but it's complex in the same way that the pattern created when a paintball hits a wall is complex.

The fact that you (and the imbecile from whom you garnered these pearls of apologetic nonsense) know nothing about Big Bang Cosmology or Evolutionary Theory doesn't negate the fact that a lot of brilliant minds do. Ignorance is not a substitute for facts.

The universe operates by uniform laws of nature. Why does it?

This is a "god of the gaps" argument. It's like a child asking "Why?" every time an answer is given until the grown-up either gets tired of the game or honestly doesn't know. But here's an observation: The difference between a living human being and a dead one is that the dead one operates by uniform laws of nature. The observance of uniform laws of nature is the very basis on which we determine that no outside force is acting on something. I find it hilarious that apologists argue from this that "Therefore god is doing all of this."

Quote-mining Feynman does nothing to bolster this claim. Even if we were baffled at the uniform laws of nature (and we aren't) you don't get to shoehorn your favorite myth into the gap in our knowledge. Wasn't that long ago that Thor was the only reasonable explanation for thunder, and the gods being angry was the only rational explanation for earthquakes and volcanos.


*Sigh* If apologists had any desire to know about the early development of DNA and the mechanisms of evolutionary development all they'd have to do is just the teeniest bit of research on the subject. Instead they just want to stop their ears, close their eyes and yell "Blah blah blah, I can't hear you, DNA is too complex to have evolved it must have been designed!"

We know God exists because he pursues us. He is constantly initiating and seeking for us to come to him.

I was an atheist at one time. And like many atheists, the issue of people believing in God bothered me greatly. What is it about atheists that we would spend so much time, attention, and energy refuting something that we don't believe even exists?! What causes us to do that? When I was an atheist, I attributed my intentions as caring for those poor, delusional people...to help them realize their hope was completely ill-founded. To be honest, I also had another motive. As I challenged those who believed in God, I was deeply curious to see if they could convince me otherwise. Part of my quest was to become free from the question of God. If I could conclusively prove to believers that they were wrong, then the issue is off the table, and I would be free to go about my life.

God seeks to know us - Photo of sunset on an ocean shore to illustrate the warmth of God's love and desire for us to know him. I didn't realize that the reason the topic of God weighed so heavily on my mind, was because God was pressing the issue. I have come to find out that God wants to be known. He created us with the intention that we would know him. He has surrounded us with evidence of himself and he keeps the question of his existence squarely before us. It was as if I couldn't escape thinking about the possibility of God. In fact, the day I chose to acknowledge God's existence, my prayer began with, "Ok, you win..." It might be that the underlying reason atheists are bothered by people believing in God is because God is actively pursuing them.

Argument by appeal to a persuing god? :rotfl:

Again with the bullshit "testimony" stuff. "I was once an atheist ..."

The issue of people believing in some god (get your head out of your ass, there are thousands of them) doesn't bother me. You want to know why atheists spend time, attention and energy refuting something we don't believe even exists? It's because believers in these bronze-age ignorant myths band together into cohesive voting blocks and use their numbers to legislate oppression to those who don't believe.

No, it's not as bad now as it was 60 years ago when it was illegal to be a homosexual and punishment for it included chemical castration. And that wasn't as bad as a couple hundred years ago when witches were burned at the stake. And that wasn't as bad as 400 years ago when the Spanish Inquisitions tortured and brutally murdered thousands of infidels at the behest of the church.

It's not as bad now as it was then precisely because atheists spend time, attention, and energy refuting something that they don't believe even exists.

But politically active religious fundamentalists continue to subvert the bounds of decency and respect for fellow human beings. They wage war on education systems, attempting to push their insidious mythology on all children and deny those same children the opportunity to learn how the world really works. They fight tooth and nail to deny same-sex couples the right to form a legally recognized marriage and enjoy the legal benefits thereof. Hell, I'm writing this on Sunday morning in a large, metropolitan city where any other day of the week I could run down to the convenience store and pick up a six pack to enjoy later. But I can't do it now because the fucking Christians don't like the idea of me being able to go buy a beer on their special day.

There is no god and any thoughts someone has that they are being pursued by this imaginary being is a sign of a mental disorder. I'd recommend getting help. It's the same thing I'd recommend if I heard about a woman who believed that God was telling her to kill all her children. Get help. Please.

Unlike any other revelation of God, Jesus Christ is the clearest, most specific picture of God revealing himself to us.

So what you're saying is that the Christian God (Yahweh) is better than the Muslim god Allah. I find it intriguing that the Muslims are equally certain that the Christians have it wrong. And leave us not forget that there are a significant number of pious Hindus who will gladly include both of your gods in their pantheon, but subservient to Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva, their three primary gods. And no, these aren't just other names for the trinity.

I find Yahweh/Jesus to be especially absurd. Yahweh creates these people and gives them free will specifically so they can and will do things he'd rather they didn't do. Then he gets pissy that they did those very things he didn't want them doing and requires that they kill perfectly innocent animals and burn their carcasses so he can get over it. But that doesn't appease him. Over time it gets so bad that he destroys millions of them along with nearly every animal on the planet in a giant flood, and starts all over. But the same thing happens so he gets all pissy again and starts throwing tantrums at the Egyptians until they let his chosen people go. Then he leads these chosen people on a goose chase for 40 years in the wilderness during which time at one point he sends a bunch of fiery serpents to bite and kill many of them. They finally make it to the promised land but now these same chosen people have to use bronze-age hand to hand combat and siege methods to brutalize the inhabitants of the cities they want to take.

Blood flows gratuitously as his people pillage and enslave denizens of the lands they conquer. The virgin daughters have to watch as their non-virgin mothers and brothers are slaughtered before them and then they are made into sex slaves. This tribal war god sure loooooooves blood.

There's lots more stupidity that could be pointed out but let's fast forward to Jesus, the man of the hour for this particular piece of apologetic nonsense. "The most specific picture of God revealing himself to us."

Jesus has two messages for us:

1 - Yahweh is so codependent that he can't get over the fact that people behave in ways he'd rather they didn't. Because of this he's going to sacrifice himself to himself in a brutal display of self-flagellation so that once and for all he can get over how people act.

2 - It doesn't matter how you act. The only thing that matters is whether you believe all this silly nonsense about a god-man who did all this. How you think is the only thing that matters. How you behave... well that can be forgiven as long as you think right.

Well... :rolleyes:
 
I don't think people who make these religious arguments for gods and perfection recognize the emotional/rational duality of human psychology. If I posit a designer for a universe that I perceive to be too complex and planned to simply exist, I've contradicted my very observations and conclusions. For would not such a designer - that just happens to exist - certainly need to be orders of magnitude more complex? How can my own thoughts and ideas be so opposed to one another and remain so hidden?

My entire position becomes a standing unrecognized contradiction. Why would I not recognize such a glaring conflict in my thinking? It's obviously because I am not thinking rationally and logically, not making good observations and using good judgement, much the same as if I were under the blinding influence of some drug.

Men are not all created equal. If they were all created equal they would all be equal, which they certainly are not. We can certainly affect our aspirations for equality and justice within our species by our actions, but positing a designer that has already done so in the face of copious evidence to the contrary is neither constructive nor accurate.

Manic human behavior is marked by promiscuity, boundless energy, and inventiveness. It is not a rational state of mind in today's world. It was likely the norm for hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of years of existence for our ancestors. These gods are inventions from such times when limbic emotionalism, hearing voices and having psychotic breaks were routine human behavior. Rational behavior was also present and we owe our continued survival and existence primarily to that evolved behavior.
 
I see a holy war coming on.....
1I said:
Wishful thinkers you call us. Yes! And it is great fun.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality of happiness, and by no means a necessity of life." - GEORGE BERNARD SHAW


I agree. My happiness does not add to the argument on whether or not the Bible is credible. But it is a wonderful by-product that, whether or not the Bible is a bunch of hooey or not, will objectively give us Christians a better quality of life than the non-believer. Why? Because we don't have, gnawing through our subconscious, poking through into our conscious with each passing moment, the spectre of death. What a great belief to have. And in addition,we have heaven to look forward to.

So whether or not the key in my hand fits the lock, I have the rock solid belief that it does - and that makes me giddy, necessarily or not.

Do you have the key to facing death? Are you so cool and manly that you tell yourself that it's no big deal? It's the ultimate deal amigo. So, if you do like this thing called existence, there is one necessity, just one, put before us by God - to believe in his Son - who went to the trouble for you and I, unnecessarily, of saving our asses.

Good night amigos

1I

Here's what wrong with that. You are assuming that most atheists are afraid of death, but as far as I can tell, most of us aren't afraid of death. If you need to believe in an imaginary afterlife to cope, okay. I guess I simply don't understand that need. Death is usually the relief of suffering and is nothing to fear. Sure, most of us prefer to live to see old age, but most of us don't want to live to the point where we are no longer independent, at least when it comes to our thought process.

I've personally watched countless number of people die. Most, but not all of them were Christians. Some of those Christians were very frightened of death and chose all kinds of aggressive health care measures in the hope that they would live longer. Others accepted that death was coming soon. I remember one very irreligious woman in her late 50s, who was dying from Hep C. I was no longer her primary nurse since she was now being treated by hospice, but I wanted to see how she was doing so I entered her room one day. I remember her saying to me, "I'm dying". I gently embraced her, which seemed to offer her some small bit of comfort. It was obvious to me that she had totally accepted that she was dying.

My father, who was a fundamentalist Christian, always seemed to fear death. When he was diagnosed with cancer at the age of 87, he literally said, "Cut the cancer out." My mother, on the other hand, despite sharing those same beliefs, was more rational and refused to have my father's cancer treated aggressively. It would have only caused him more suffering as he was already in terrible condition. By the time he died, about two weeks later, he was totally incoherent, which was probably good since he never had to directly face the fear of his impending death.

I've had only a few openly atheist patients over the years, but they never seemed worried or upset when they were about to face death. Death is just a part of the life cycle. We all die, just as all those who have gone before us have died. People like you apparently need the myth of everlasting life to be able to cope with your eventual death. I look at it very differently. For billions of years, the universe existed without my being in it. I'm just here for a infinitesimal period of time. I never missed anything before my birth and I will never miss anything after my death. If you want to be poetic about it, you can say that the elements that we are made up of will continue to exist in some other form.

I just can't wrap my head around the idea that somehow, magically we will exist as entities in some other form that still is able to think and receive painful stimulus. Well, I guess only those in hell can feel pain. :rolleyes: Our bodies are fully dependent on our brains. The chemicals in our brains our fully dependent on the physical structure of our brains. Our minds are not independent of our physical brains. How could there possibly be anything left after these structures are gone?


Have you ever known anyone who was in the final stages of Alzheimer's? If so, you realize that their ability to think and function in any reliable way is gone? If the disease kills them, it's due to the inability of the brain to continue to transmit what it takes for the person to swallow. Unless aggressive measures are taken by inserting a feeding tube, a very cruel thing imo, the person will die a peaceful death from dehydration. The only good thing about AD is that those who suffer from this disease never realize that they are dying. They've lost the ability to do that. So, if you're the type of person who fears death, you will lose that fear.

As far as your post about evolution, it's very obvious that you don't even have a basic understanding of evolution. To put it in the simplest terms, evolution is about tiny little changes that take place, usually over a long period of time. But, when it comes to microbes, we can actually see evolution in action. Evolution isn't something that simply stopped after humans reached our current point. It's a continuous process, no gods required. How it all started is beyond my understanding and there are still unanswered questions for all of us to ponder. But believing that some powerful entity created it all is simply lazy intellectually. It's wishful thinking at best.

And of course, it does beg the question, how did god get to exist? Isn't it more difficult to believe that one creature was able to create such a complicated world as our universe, then to at least have a limited understanding that life evolved from a tiny single cell organism. I don't have all the answers, but I don't believe in magic either, so I'd need a much better explanation than the one you've given us. Isn't it difficult to imagine an entity who has always existed? If not, than why it is so difficult to consider that perhaps the universe has always existed? Just because we don't know all of the details, doesn't mean that some super nature entity put it all together.

But okay. I've accepted that you do believe in what appears to me, to be magic and it helps you sleep better at night believing that you aren't going to die. Instead you're going to be transformed into some other living thing that goes to a special place where you will live happily ever after. That just doesn't work for me. But one more thing before I end my wordy post. Why can't you simply believe in a god that will judge his creatures by their character instead of by their beliefs? At least that god wouldn't be so egotistical as a god who only wants those who worship him to enter into his heaven.

Oh, and btw, I have a much happier life than all of my Christian friends. They are the ones who have terrible problems. i am the one who sometimes offers them comfort, emotional support and in a few cases, I go out of my way to do things for them, like loan them money or pick up their Rxs.at the pharmacy because I am their only friend and they have no transportation. So, stop assuming that all atheists are miserable people with poor qualities of life.
 
I see a holy war coming on.....
1I said:
Wishful thinkers you call us. Yes! And it is great fun.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality of happiness, and by no means a necessity of life." - GEORGE BERNARD SHAW


I agree. My happiness does not add to the argument on whether or not the Bible is credible. But it is a wonderful by-product that, whether or not the Bible is a bunch of hooey or not, will objectively give us Christians a better quality of life than the non-believer. Why? Because we don't have, gnawing through our subconscious, poking through into our conscious with each passing moment, the spectre of death. What a great belief to have. And in addition,we have heaven to look forward to.

So whether or not the key in my hand fits the lock, I have the rock solid belief that it does - and that makes me giddy, necessarily or not.

Do you have the key to facing death? Are you so cool and manly that you tell yourself that it's no big deal? It's the ultimate deal amigo. So, if you do like this thing called existence, there is one necessity, just one, put before us by God - to believe in his Son - who went to the trouble for you and I, unnecessarily, of saving our asses.

Good night amigos

1I
This is a cynical and dishonest stance.

So long as an inkling of "might be hooey" is there, you have no rock solid belief. However much you're able to bottle up "the spectre of death" that's "gnawing" now and again into consciousness, it's never complete so long as you remain aware there's wishful thinking involved.

If you merely talk yourself into believing that you'll survive death, and are aware that's what you've done, then is it really the key to facing death?

And in spite of claiming you agree with the GB Shaw quote, you talk like relieving the fear of death is a good reason to believe that Jesus is real. From claiming to be giddy because you believe something that might not be true, you make the leap to "there is one necessity... to believe in his Son". There's a blurring of belief and reality in there, so it's not clear you understand that belief and reality are two different things.

Whether or not I have "the key to facing death", it couldn't be more plain that you do not.
 
Last edited:
If you promote that Jesus loves people, you do it expecting they'll find appeal in the idea of Jesus loving them, right?

I agree but there must be quite a few who won't find it appealing when they realise they would have to repent from certain things, give up those particular pleasures, whatever it is, depending.
I'm going to ask about this too. What are "those particular pleasures"? I see you said "depending", but give some examples.

Anything sinful basically. Despite the non-appeal to give them up, where some may do depending on each individual (I should have said previously).

Jesus's "love" was more than onerous -- it was hateful. Those "sins" didn't need to be repented of. It's hatred of the body and a wish to control people, not just their behavior but their minds, that causes anyone to dream up that kind of oppressive moralizing.

Maybe you're going to say my church didn't reflect Jesus' love. If so, then I wonder: what are the sorts of wrong that one has to repent to get Jesus' love? Don't say "murder, rape, theft" and other things that everyone knows are wrong. What are some of "those particular pleasures" that don't jibe with Jesus' love?

I see it in the context that its not the hatred of the body, its more of: not letting those desires take control in such a way that you would go to some lengths to it take it from someone else (physically,emotionally or both) and even if its not carried out, its still sinful as a wishful thought. e.g. in the heart etc.. Those thoughts you wouldn't want people to know or brag about.

(BB later, too many interuptions)
 
It sounds to me like One-eye is afraid of life, not death. I've known people like that. They didn't fear death so much as continuing to live in a world that they perceive as unfair and unjust. Their belief in some kind of wonderful afterlife was their escape from the unpleasantness of their own lives over which they did not have complete control. So they invented a world where the bad guys were punished and the good guys were rewarded and everyone lived happily ever after. Their afterlife was their perfect fantasy. For whatever reason they had largely given up on their real life and invented a pretend one, it was their way of coping with reality, a reality filled with disappointment and resentment, a sense of having been unjustly cheated out of complete bliss and happiness.

Such fantasies can ease the sting of life, no doubt, but are they healthy psychologically? I think they can be if they are a step along the path to improving one's outlook and becoming active in actually realizing concepts like justice and equality. But if they short-circuit the actual process of improvement I think they are destructive.
 
I see a holy war coming on.....
1I said:
Wishful thinkers you call us. Yes! And it is great fun.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality of happiness, and by no means a necessity of life." - GEORGE BERNARD SHAW


I agree. My happiness does not add to the argument on whether or not the Bible is credible. But it is a wonderful by-product that, whether or not the Bible is a bunch of hooey or not, will objectively give us Christians a better quality of life than the non-believer. Why? Because we don't have, gnawing through our subconscious, poking through into our conscious with each passing moment, the spectre of death. What a great belief to have. And in addition,we have heaven to look forward to.

... snip ..
But if Christians actually believed and followed the teachings in the Bible then they would live like wandering Buddhist ascetics. Maybe there are some that do but I personally know of none. All the people I know that call themselves Christian hang onto and protect their personal possessions, have a job, try to hang onto and increase their wealth. Some even have disobedient children they haven't had killed as directed in Deuteronomy.

Don't misinterpret. I think is is damned good that Christians ignore most of the Bible. They would live a miserable life if they didn't. The problem I have with Christians is that they have deluded themselves into believing that they are following the teachings in the Bible while they are actually living like atheists but have convinced themselves that there is a heaven that they will be rewarded.

I certainly get the feeling that most Christians have never actually read the whole Bible... only the few excerpts they were directed to by their priest, preacher, or minister. And, even at that, blindly accept the sophistic interpretation offered by their religious leaders for some of those passages rather than the plain meaning that was written.
 
will objectively give us Christians a better quality of life than the non-believer. Why? Because we don't have, gnawing through our subconscious, poking through into our conscious with each passing moment, the spectre of death.
Pfff and Fffft.
In my experience, those that fear death, or anything else, are desperate for reassurances, rational or otherwise. Promises of success and/or cheating the expected consequences of their actions.
It's the paralytic fear that leads to the gripping of talismans, the practice of superstition, appeals to magic and occult, whistling thru the graveyard.

If any given atheist was all that haunted by The Spectre Of Death, they'd be in the front pew, singing loud and making sure everyone sees how devout they are, so they can tell themselves that the almighty space teddy bear will protect them from the Monster: Death.

People who accept that it's not that scary are free to evaluate thes various empty promises of protection, salvation, and happy endings as hokum and palliatives.

But, you know, if the skybeast makes you feel warm and cozy inside, that's great. Just, from over here, it doesn't really look to be real, you know? Looks more like a nursery blanket.

So, lije, what else you got, for areason for us to even want to buy what you're selling?
 
[h=1]“I do not fear death. I had been dead for billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it.” [/h]
- Mark Twian
 
I'm going to ask about this too. What are "those particular pleasures"? I see you said "depending", but give some examples.

Anything sinful basically. Despite the non-appeal to give them up, where some may do depending on each individual (I should have said previously).

Jesus's "love" was more than onerous -- it was hateful. Those "sins" didn't need to be repented of. It's hatred of the body and a wish to control people, not just their behavior but their minds, that causes anyone to dream up that kind of oppressive moralizing.

Maybe you're going to say my church didn't reflect Jesus' love. If so, then I wonder: what are the sorts of wrong that one has to repent to get Jesus' love? Don't say "murder, rape, theft" and other things that everyone knows are wrong. What are some of "those particular pleasures" that don't jibe with Jesus' love?

I see it in the context that its not the hatred of the body, its more of: not letting those desires take control in such a way that you would go to some lengths to it take it from someone else (physically,emotionally or both) and even if its not carried out, its still sinful as a wishful thought. e.g. in the heart etc.. Those thoughts you wouldn't want people to know or brag about.

(BB later, too many interuptions)


If the few things that you've mentioned are "sins", why do so many Christians continue to commit those sins even after they have been "saved"? I assume that you don't live in such a sheltered world that you aren't aware of how common it is for Christians to cheat on their spouses, abuse their children etc. Have you been following the most recent scandals associated with the Southern Baptist Churches? There have been numerous pastors and youth pastors who have sexually assaulted children and teenagers! Why haven't their beliefs protected them from doing these things? Why weren't they able to control their urges?

My point is that I've never found Christians as a group, to be any more morally intact than any other group of people. So, if you think that Christians have some higher moral sense than other groups of people, I'm here to tell you that you are either very naive or you are somehow able to deny the things that are going on in your own community, or in neighboring Christian communities. Or, is that the Christian always has the option to ask forgiveness for his sins and magically god will bless him for that. That's all it takes, right?
 
If the few things that you've mentioned are "sins", why do so many Christians continue to commit those sins even after they have been "saved"? I assume that you don't live in such a sheltered world that you aren't aware of how common it is for Christians to cheat on their spouses, abuse their children etc. Have you been following the most recent scandals associated with the Southern Baptist Churches? There have been numerous pastors and youth pastors who have sexually assaulted children and teenagers! Why haven't their beliefs protected them from doing these things? Why weren't they able to control their urges?

My point is that I've never found Christians as a group, to be any more morally intact than any other group of people. So, if you think that Christians have some higher moral sense than other groups of people, I'm here to tell you that you are either very naive or you are somehow able to deny the things that are going on in your own community, or in neighboring Christian communities. Or, is that the Christian always has the option to ask forgiveness for his sins and magically god will bless him for that. That's all it takes, right?

The example of christian Europe is probably the best example of how christianity is nothing more than a new coat of paint. After its conversion to Jesus there was no letup in the bloodletting. It was constant war for centuries, christian on christian, ultimately leading to the rise of Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy and Stalinist Russia. If being christian is the answer then how does it lead to such gargantuan horror that embroils the entire globe?

I always liked this clip from the movie Gettysburg. Kilrain's delivery to Chamberlain covers all the bases. The christian U.S. was about the same business of horrific slaughter. The author's words delivered by Kilrain are worth more than ten billion billion bibles.

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRB2dGI1vRM[/YOUTUBE]
 
This is a cynical and dishonest stance.

So long as an inkling of "might be hooey" is there, you have no rock solid belief. However much you're able to bottle up "the spectre of death" that's "gnawing" now and again into consciousness, it's never complete so long as you remain aware there's wishful thinking involved.

If you merely talk yourself into believing that you'll survive death, and are aware that's what you've done, then is it really the key to facing death?

And in spite of claiming you agree with the GB Shaw quote, you talk like relieving the fear of death is a good reason to believe that Jesus is real. From claiming to be giddy because you believe something that might not be true, you make the leap to "there is one necessity... to believe in his Son". There's a blurring of belief and reality in there, so it's not clear you understand that belief and reality are two different things.

Whether or not I have "the key to facing death", it couldn't be more plain that you do not.
Hello, Abaddon. Howdy! That is a funny wish. Avoiding what is natural in this world - death, and trying to find something beyond it. :)
 
Anything sinful basically. Despite the non-appeal to give them up, where some may do depending on each individual (I should have said previously).



I see it in the context that its not the hatred of the body, its more of: not letting those desires take control in such a way that you would go to some lengths to it take it from someone else (physically,emotionally or both) and even if its not carried out, its still sinful as a wishful thought. e.g. in the heart etc.. Those thoughts you wouldn't want people to know or brag about.

(BB later, too many interuptions)


If the few things that you've mentioned are "sins", why do so many Christians continue to commit those sins even after they have been "saved"?

About the Christians themselves (besides the appeal of the doctrine in previous quote) , there is some debate among the Christians about the idea of once saved always saved, I'm one of those that don't follow this, obviously if they are continuing to do the very same sins again and again. It could vary though depending how much one believes the Gospels are true, so to speak.

I know there are those who do believe of the cosequences, fear of God but are going through torturous battles within themselves to overcome their sins.

I assume that you don't live in such a sheltered world that you aren't aware of how common it is for Christians to cheat on their spouses, abuse their children etc. Have you been following the most recent scandals associated with the Southern Baptist Churches? There have been numerous pastors and youth pastors who have sexually assaulted children and teenagers! Why haven't their beliefs protected them from doing these things? Why weren't they able to control their urges?

We know of these things too (and agree with the same concern). As previously mentioned, it boils down to how much one actually believes imo, i.e. not having any real fear of consequences or they're not actually believers at all (not forgetting prosperity churches).

Matthew 7:21-23
I Never Knew You

21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’


My point is that I've never found Christians as a group, to be any more morally intact than any other group of people. So, if you think that Christians have some higher moral sense than other groups of people, I'm here to tell you that you are either very naive or you are somehow able to deny the things that are going on in your own community, or in neighboring Christian communities.

Or, is that the Christian always has the option to ask forgiveness for his sins and magically god will bless him for that. That's all it takes, right?

Simply its case by case because of the many variables among many individuals. Committing the same sin continously may not be so easy to forgive imo.
 
Last edited:
Hello, Abaddon. Howdy! That is a funny wish. Avoiding what is natural in this world - death, and trying to find something beyond it. :)
Hi aupmanyav. Long time no see. You should come around more!

Yeah, death is part of life, you don't get one without the other. What the Christians want is an escape hatch so their little-s self can escape. How nature is isn't interesting to them, except to contradict it whenever it makes them uncomfortable. Their egoistic self and its wants is all that matters to them. So they believe as they impulsively want to.
 
The false rhetoric that Christians fear death and... making it an argument is absurd. If no-one has noticed ... It doesn't match the theology e.g. disciples and Christians lives ending tragically whilst professing their faith. We are talking of the everyday known physical death I am assuming. I personally don't want to die 'yet' only because theres much I need/ want to do (and enjoy at the same time).

There is no escape hatch in physical death, just as the saying goes:

Hebrews 9:27

27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
 
Back
Top Bottom