LordKiran
Veteran Member
A couple of notes:
- An increase in life expectancy without an increase in quality of life might be a bad thing.
- Death can still occur even if life expectancy increases faster than time. In fact, death can still be a certainty.
Look at Kurzweil's work--he's predicting uploading the mind at 2040. While I think he's being overly optimistic on some of the technology he's also aiming too low--he's looking at uploading to desktop computers but we don't need to limit it thus. We can use far beefier computers, if Moore's law holds we will have them in the early 30s. (And note that the very nature of the mind is highly parallel. Massive processor arrays are a viable answer, we don't need blazing speed in a single processor.) (Note that he's looking at simulation which doesn't require understanding. If we can extract the information we can do it.)
If the quality of life is bad, upload when it becomes an option. Also, upload makes it much less likely you'll die and it makes it much easier to back up your mind in case you do.
This doesn't really address the fundemental concept of death as a metaphysical transition of consciousness from your mortal coil into the unknown (Most likely nonexistence.)
You have no reason to believe that which is uploaded will be you, rather than a simulation with all your memories and personality traits. So really it's still death by another name, with all the uncertainty and fear that comes with it. Unless you can find a way to maintain the human consciousness within it's original shell, we're all doomed to death no matter what science brings.