• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

When Idiots Attack: The Rise of Anti-intellectualism and the Illegalization of Critical Thought

AthenaAwakened

Contributor
Joined
Sep 17, 2003
Messages
5,369
Location
Right behind you so ... BOO!
Basic Beliefs
non-theist, anarcho-socialist
Recently, I found out that my work is mentioned in a book that has been banned, in effect, from the schools in Tucson, Arizona. The anti-ethnic studies law passed by the state prohibits teachings that "promote the overthrow of the United States government," "promote resentment toward a race or class of people," "are designed primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group," and/or "advocate ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals." I invite you to read the book in question, titled Critical Race Theory: An Introduction, so that you can decide for yourselves whether it qualifies.

In fact, I invite you to take on as your summer reading the astonishingly lengthy list of books that have been removed from the Tucson public school system as part of this wholesale elimination of the Mexican-American studies curriculum. The authors and editors include Isabel Allende, Junot Díaz, Jonathan Kozol, Rudolfo Anaya, bell hooks, Sandra Cisneros, James Baldwin, Howard Zinn, Rodolfo Acuña, Ronald Takaki, Jerome Skolnick and Gloria Anzaldúa. Even Thoreau's Civil Disobedience and Shakespeare's The Tempest received the hatchet.

Trying to explain what was offensive enough to warrant killing the entire curriculum and firing its director, Tucson school board member Michael Hicks stated rather proudly that he was not actually familiar with the curriculum. "I chose not to go to any of their classes," he told Al Madrigal on The Daily Show. "Why even go?" In the same interview, he referred to Rosa Parks as "Rosa Clark."
http://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ellectualism-us-book-banning?CMP=share_btn_tw

When Empires fall, the shit ain't pretty.
 
In all honesty, most of the people I know are anti-intellectual little piss ants. They wouldn't know how to live if they didn't have a bogeyman of some kind to demonize, and from which they could derive a personal identity.
 
The other day I was reading an article on fishing with unconventional bait. The article's author observed that there are a few species that will hit and swallow anything, including soap, carboard, and bubble gum.

Perhaps he was thinking of carpus liberalis aquaticus? In its most recent feeding frenzy, it seems that the actual "banning" was rescinded in 2013 and that the "banning" did not remove it from the school library but did prevent their use as class textbooks.

Gives a whole new meaning to carboard and bubble gum complaints...no? ;)
 
The other day I was reading an article on fishing with unconventional bait. The article's author observed that there are a few species that will hit and swallow anything, including soap, carboard, and bubble gum.

Perhaps he was thinking of carpus liberalis aquaticus? In its most recent feeding frenzy, it seems that the actual "banning" was rescinded in 2013 and that the "banning" did not remove it from the school library but did prevent their use as class textbooks.

Gives a whole new meaning to carboard and bubble gum complaints...no? ;)

And?

The date of the article is on the site, and the year is in the link. No one has said anything about the date until you. Does the date somehow make the article a lie?

And be careful sir, the "bait" you swallow may be your own
 
The date of the article is in May of 2012.
The following article is in 2013.

Mexican American Studies Books Un-Banned In Arizona
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/23/mexican-american-studies-book-ban_n_4149048.html

That said, i suspect several of these books ought to have remained unapproved as textbooks.
Banning shit is not a tool useful for forwarding intellectual freedom. Get a grip.

Reactionaries can't help themselves. And they don't know how to get a grip.
 
The date of the article is in May of 2012.
The following article is in 2013.

Mexican American Studies Books Un-Banned In Arizona
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/23/mexican-american-studies-book-ban_n_4149048.html

That said, i suspect several of these books ought to have remained unapproved as textbooks.
Banning shit is not a tool useful for forwarding intellectual freedom. Get a grip.

So then, you support promoting shit? And what purpose does it serve to authorize a school teacher to use a textbook that promotes the politics of disunity and mutual animosity , to say nothing of its historical fantasies? Are what the kids taught up to the taxpayer or parents, or the teacher as ideologue?
 
Banning shit is not a tool useful for forwarding intellectual freedom. Get a grip.

So then, you support promoting shit? And what purpose does it serve to authorize a school teacher to use a textbook that promotes the politics of disunity and mutual animosity , to say nothing of its historical fantasies? Are what the kids taught up to the taxpayer or parents, or to whatever ideological preferences the teacher has?
One could make a decent argument that the original Constitution promoted the politics of disunity with its entrenchment of slavery. Something tells me you would not approve of banning any textbook that omitted the original US constitution.
 
So then, you support promoting shit? And what purpose does it serve to authorize a school teacher to use a textbook that promotes the politics of disunity and mutual animosity , to say nothing of its historical fantasies? Are what the kids taught up to the taxpayer or parents, or to whatever ideological preferences the teacher has?
One could make a decent argument that the original Constitution promoted the politics of disunity with its entrenchment of slavery. Something tells me you would not approve of banning any textbook that omitted the original US constitution.

Teaching the facts of historical documents that may contain conflicted values does not necessarily teach disunity, and quite often can be used to teach American kids unifying values. However, there is a difference between acknowledging and explaining disunity and its causes, and to intentionally promote the politics of disunity and mutual animosity. When a textbook promotes rubbish such as AZTLAN, it is not doing anything more than promoting separatism and historical hooey.
 
The other day I was reading an article on fishing with unconventional bait. The article's author observed that there are a few species that will hit and swallow anything, including soap, carboard, and bubble gum.

Perhaps he was thinking of carpus liberalis aquaticus? In its most recent feeding frenzy, it seems that the actual "banning" was rescinded in 2013 and that the "banning" did not remove it from the school library but did prevent their use as class textbooks.

Gives a whole new meaning to carboard and bubble gum complaints...no? ;)

What the hell? You know that list of books is like a mile long? And includes 'Saving Our Schools: The Case for Public Education, Saying No to "No Child Left Behind"'

So 7 of those are allowed again and you think this is a nonissue? At least try to finance a clue.
 
Banning shit is not a tool useful for forwarding intellectual freedom. Get a grip.

So then, you support promoting shit? And what purpose does it serve to authorize a school teacher to use a textbook that promotes the politics of disunity and mutual animosity , to say nothing of its historical fantasies? Are what the kids taught up to the taxpayer or parents, or the teacher as ideologue?

Regulate the teacher. Have you learned nothing from the legalization of mary jane? There are national standards which adjust some of the local tendencies using money as a carrot. If national policy becomes me oriented then we're up shit creek. Those of us who demand more rights to inquire will have to vote with our feet.
 
The other day I was reading an article on fishing with unconventional bait. The article's author observed that there are a few species that will hit and swallow anything, including soap, carboard, and bubble gum.

Perhaps he was thinking of carpus liberalis aquaticus? In its most recent feeding frenzy, it seems that the actual "banning" was rescinded in 2013 and that the "banning" did not remove it from the school library but did prevent their use as class textbooks.

Gives a whole new meaning to carboard and bubble gum complaints...no? ;)

What the hell? You know that list of books is like a mile long? And includes 'Saving Our Schools: The Case for Public Education, Saying No to "No Child Left Behind"'

So 7 of those are allowed again and you think this is a nonissue? At least try to finance a clue.

Speaking of being clueless, what are you basing that claim on other than the OP's link? The link is to an article by left-wing ideologue and "critical theory" hawker Patricia Williams. For someone more credible:

Are books being banned from Tucson Unified School District classrooms as part of the district's work to dismantle Mexican-American studies after the governing board voted Tuesday, Jan. 10 to end the classes?

Well, it depends on your definition of "ban" ... maybe yes, and maybe no.

School textbooks are being taken out of MAS classrooms—the seven books on a list referred to in administrative Judge Lewis Kowal's recent decision. Teachers are also being told by administrators that they need to be careful about other books they teach from and the curriculum they use, and that perhaps the best way to handle this is to refer to the administrative judge's decision and state Superintendent John Huppenthal's ruling, which cite a variety of other contemporary novels and writings that are considered suspect.

The school district says no books are being banned; they're still available in libraries and other areas. But teachers are being told to stay away from books and lessons that have themes on race, ethnicity and oppression.

The school district actually banned only six or seven books (per the judges order) but only warned about some other books that the judge named that he considered suspect (but still legal).

http://www.tucsonweekly.com/TheRange/archives/2012/01/17/tusd-banning-book-well-yes-and-no-and-yes
 
One could make a decent argument that the original Constitution promoted the politics of disunity with its entrenchment of slavery. Something tells me you would not approve of banning any textbook that omitted the original US constitution.

Teaching the facts of historical documents that may contain conflicted values does not necessarily teach disunity, and quite often can be used to teach American kids unifying values. However, there is a difference between acknowledging and explaining disunity and its causes, and to intentionally promote the politics of disunity and mutual animosity. When a textbook promotes rubbish such as AZTLAN, it is not doing anything more than promoting separatism and historical hooey.
The same argument you make for the US constitution could be made for using books that have AZTLAN etc... I do appreciate the fine line you articulate in your response, but it is shame you do not recognize it has two sides.
 
Back
Top Bottom