• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Why does the media equate female Muslim with hijab?

imrs.php

What's the black guy with the "e=" on his shirt supposed to represent? Is that some sort of religion I don't know about?

Also, why is there two handicapped people in the picture?

The diversity of it all seems a little contrived if you ask me.
 

What's the black guy with the "e=" on his shirt supposed to represent? Is that some sort of religion I don't know about?

Also, why is there two handicapped people in the picture?

The diversity of it all seems a little contrived if you ask me.

Materialist non-believers if I had to guess. I think it's amusing that the artist is willing to give us enough credit to accurately interpret the symbolism of a math equation but not enough to know what a crescent moon and star represent. Though that's just me nit-picking.
 
... isn't that what the religious icons are for? E.g. the star and crescent?
Am I the only one who is bothered by the design of the crescent?
Star_and_Crescent.png

It is not what an actual crescent moon (i.e. phase of a moon < half circle, as opposed to gibbous) looks like, but more like an partial/annular solar eclipse.
1TB-eclipse2-superJumbo-v2.jpg


Also, is the star supposed to be Venus? It's often to be found in the vicinity of the crescent Moon, and is bright enough to be seen while it is still light out.
 

What's the black guy with the "e=" on his shirt supposed to represent? Is that some sort of religion I don't know about?

Also, why is there two handicapped people in the picture?

The diversity of it all seems a little contrived if you ask me.

And no one is wearing colander in the picture, what's up with that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WAB
Google's doodle today shows a group of people with a variety of religions. Of course the female Muslim is wearing the hijab.

imrs.php


Time's "Muslims in America" photo bit shows every single female with the hijbab. _Every_ _Single_ _One_

http://content.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1725413_1554952,00.html

And of course, this image has become the symbol of people who want to stand up against intolerance against Muslims:

images


And yet there are millions of Muslims who do not think wearing the hijab is necessary nor mandatory and therefore do not wear it and yet are just as Muslim as all the others.

Why is there this obsession with the hijab and this tendency of the media and those on the left to normalize the idea that a proper female Muslim wears the hijab?

The Hijab is being pushed by more conservative and radical groups that align themselves with the West. Wearing the Hijab isn't even in the Quran.
 
It isn't all that long ago since no woman in the UK would go our without a hat, and lots wore headscarves (often to protect their perms). The way of dress currently demanded(?) of western women,too, would have seemed indecent. Customs change over time, and differ from place to place, most of the Middle East (from Greece, actually) having had some very puritanical ones. These things change, but cartoonists and such are desperate for easy identification. Live and let live is the only thing to do.
 
It isn't all that long ago since no woman in the UK would go our without a hat, and lots wore headscarves (often to protect their perms). The way of dress currently demanded(?) of western women,too, would have seemed indecent. Customs change over time, and differ from place to place, most of the Middle East (from Greece, actually) having had some very puritanical ones. These things change, but cartoonists and such are desperate for easy identification. Live and let live is the only thing to do.

This is true but Muslim women in the UK may choose whether they wear a Hijab or not. Laws banning it are just as bad as Jihandi's enforcing it. When wearing is imposed this becomes a dress code prescribed by women for men to wear. :)
 
It isn't all that long ago since no woman in the UK would go our without a hat, and lots wore headscarves (often to protect their perms). The way of dress currently demanded(?) of western women,too, would have seemed indecent. Customs change over time, and differ from place to place, most of the Middle East (from Greece, actually) having had some very puritanical ones. These things change, but cartoonists and such are desperate for easy identification. Live and let live is the only thing to do.

The headscarf was superfluous to that end though since the artist also included a crescent and star on her shirt. If I had to guess, the Hijab was more about identifying her as a her rather than as a muslim since the fidelity of the work isn't the greatest.
 
Well, in the Google case, you need to berate the liberal media source of 15 year old Sarah Harrison, the HS contest winner...

She is reflecting the normalization that a proper Muslim woman wears the hijab in that case. It further reinforces the point.

LOL...she is 15. The reality is that the vast majority of Muslim woman wear a head scarf (hijab) in public. I agree that Muslim woman should be free to choose to cover or not cover their hair, but I hardly think that a head scarf is a sign of oppression. 50 years ago we had many Catholic nuns doing the same thing. Now the walking tent hijab is another thing and I think that is oppressive and disgusting. I found the Times art to be a tasteful blend of modern and yet respectful to most Muslims with covered hair, but also obviously with makeup.

Yes, we should encourage Muslim moderates to be public and open, but that also comes with accepting them where they are at. The Dums had no issue with HRC's Muslim staffer Huma Mahmood Abedin, and she is a shining example of a modern western Muslim woman, hair and all. The Repugs were the ones trying to taint it as something bad.
 
She is reflecting the normalization that a proper Muslim woman wears the hijab in that case. It further reinforces the point.

LOL...she is 15. The reality is that the vast majority of Muslim woman wear a head scarf (hijab) in public. I agree that Muslim woman should be free to choose to cover or not cover their hair, but I hardly think that a head scarf is a sign of oppression. 50 years ago we had many Catholic nuns doing the same thing. Now the walking tent hijab is another thing and I think that is oppressive and disgusting. I found the Times art to be a tasteful blend of modern and yet respectful to most Muslims with covered hair, but also obviously with makeup.

Yes, we should encourage Muslim moderates to be public and open, but that also comes with accepting them where they are at. The Dums had no issue with HRC's Muslim staffer Huma Mahmood Abedin, and she is a shining example of a modern western Muslim woman, hair and all. The Repugs were the ones trying to taint it as something bad.

The Catholic church is simply another example of an oppresive culture. I'm not sure how that is an argument against the hijab symbolizing oppressive cultural gender norms.

Also, I'm not sure what proportion of Muslim women wear a hijab, but my impression is that it varies pretty significantly by country of origin, and country of residence. I've almost never met an Iranian girl in the US who wears the hijab, but I've met a lot of Somalis who do.
 
LOL...she is 15. The reality is that the vast majority of Muslim woman wear a head scarf (hijab) in public. I agree that Muslim woman should be free to choose to cover or not cover their hair, but I hardly think that a head scarf is a sign of oppression. 50 years ago we had many Catholic nuns doing the same thing. Now the walking tent hijab is another thing and I think that is oppressive and disgusting. I found the Times art to be a tasteful blend of modern and yet respectful to most Muslims with covered hair, but also obviously with makeup.

Yes, we should encourage Muslim moderates to be public and open, but that also comes with accepting them where they are at. The Dums had no issue with HRC's Muslim staffer Huma Mahmood Abedin, and she is a shining example of a modern western Muslim woman, hair and all. The Repugs were the ones trying to taint it as something bad.

The Catholic church is simply another example of an oppresive culture. I'm not sure how that is an argument against the hijab symbolizing oppressive cultural gender norms.

Also, I'm not sure what proportion of Muslim women wear a hijab, but my impression is that it varies pretty significantly by country of origin, and country of residence. I've almost never met an Iranian girl in the US who wears the hijab, but I've met a lot of Somalis who do.

Good points. Many Somalis do. I lived in the Middle East and when I did not I also worked with Middle Easterners on projects based in China. Many Arab women coming from the UAE, Qatar, Saudi,Jordan and Palestine nearly all discard this when they arrive in European countries.
 
If I may say? I cursorily read through the thread, and therefore I would like to clarify some issues that I would like to address that has emerged up on this thread that is based on either some misunderstanding or misinformation. By the way, lest it cause confusion, my intention is to generally address some posts and points without addressing anyone specifically.

Hijab’s Obligation in the Qur’an for Women
#1) Hijab is an obligation that is explicitly required of believing women in the Qur’an. This is literally a fardh (mandatory act) that is asked of women in the Qur’an. The two verses that makes this clear are from Chapter 33 “The Clans” verse 59 and Chapter 24 “The Light” verse 59 respectively.

The Qur’an’s verse (33:59) says, “O Prophet! Say to your wives and your daughters and (the) women (of) the believers to draw over themselves [of] their outer garments. That (is) more suitable that they should be known and not harmed. And is Allah Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.”

The Qur’an verse (24:31) says, “And say to the believing women (that) they should lower [of] their gaze and they should guard their chastity, and not (to) display their adornment except what is apparent of it. And let them their head covers over their bosoms, and not (to) display their adornment except to their husbands, or their fathers or fathers (of) their husbands or their sons or sons (of) their husbands or their brothers or sons (of) their brothers or sons (of) their sisters, or their women or what possess their right hands or the attendants having no physical desire among [the] men or [the] children who (are) not aware of private aspects (of) the women. And not let them their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah altogether O believers! So that you may succeed.”

Head Covering’s Obligation in the Sunnah (Prophetic Tradition) for Men
2) In the Sunnah (prophetic tradition), Muslim men are obliged to also cover their heads with amama, a head covering. The obligation of men to cover their heads is made clear in the Sunnah (prophetic tradition), which is considered the equal weight of the Qur’an and is the lens through which the Qur’an is ultimately interpreted.

In the Sunnah, for men, the following ahadeeth (plural of the word hadeeth translated as prophetic saying) exist as to the obligation of wearing amama/head covering:

“Tie the amama. It will increase you in forbearance.”

“When you enter the mosque wear a hat and tie the Amama, because the Amama is the crown of the Muslims.”

“Make a practice of tying the Amama as it is the crown of the angels and hang it (the Shimla-tail) at the back.”

Commentary:
The wearing of hijab for women or for men to wear a head covering has nothing to do with political Islam or Islamism; it is simply a command in Islam. Period. So, if either a Muslim woman or man says that that is not the case in Islam, then the onus is on the claimant to bring proof that hijab is not required in Islam and that men are exempt from following the Sunnah of wearing the amama.

There are Muslim women of course who do not wear the hijab: They may choose not to wear it for many reasons including but not limited to either (a) being ignorant of the injunction’s existence in the Qur’an, (b) not being practicing/religious (lax), (c) denialism, (d) trying to avoid harms of hostile others when in fear of one’s life, property, or well-being, (e) or being old, or (f) medical reason. The only three reasons considered valid in Islam to not wear or fulfill the obligation of hijab is (d) and (e) and (f). It's also true that there are Muslim men of course who do not wear any head covering; they may choose to not wear the imamah sharif for similar reasons, but the only valid reason for them to not wear the imamah sharif is (d) or (f).

Also, I’d remind everyone that Islam does not see itself as a new religion but the same religion that was given to all the other prophets, that is, the prophets within the Bible and Torah. For example, the Qur’an, Chapter 42 “Consultation” verse 13 clearly says, “The same religion has He established for you as that which He enjoined on Noah - the which We have sent by inspiration to thee - and that which We enjoined on Abraham, Moses, and Jesus: Namely, that ye should remain steadfast in religion, and make no divisions therein: to those who worship other things than Allah, hard is the (way) to which thou callest them. Allah chooses to Himself those whom He pleases, and guides to Himself those who turn (to Him).

Islam, let’s remember, is touted as an Abrahamic religion for a reason.

So, for example, from Wikipedia, since we’re discussing veils or the subject of veiling, the following is written on current practice [of veiling] in Western Christianity:
In Continental Europe and North America at the start of the 20th century, women in most mainstream Christian denominations wore head coverings during church services. These included many Anglican, Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian and Roman Catholic Churches. At worship, in parts of the Western World, many women started to wear bonnets in lieu of headcoverings, and later, hats became predominant. However, eventually, in North America, this practice started to decline, with some exceptions, such as among conservative Mennonites and Amish, and Traditionalist Catholics. In nations in regions such as the Indian subcontinent, nearly all women wear head coverings during church services.[46] Female members of Jehovah's Witnesses may only lead prayer and teaching when no baptized male is available to, and must do so wearing a head covering; male Witnesses are to remove any headcovering (hats) when representing even a small group in public prayer. Female members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormons) are required to veil their faces during a part of the temple worship ceremonies. Both Roman Catholic and Anglican nuns wear a veil.

And there’s also an article that a person interested in the subject of veiling in Judaism can read called, “Reorienting the Veil.”

Now, it is true that historically there have been time periods or cultures wherein Muslim women did not wear the hijab, but that was not largely because the end of the Ottoman Caliphate had led to nationalistic movements in the Muslim world, which had in trying to recover from the setback of being defeated in WWII overcompensated with somewhat conscious chaotic amputation of spirituality and religion from mundane affairs in the culture. Now, modern women, after acquiring knowledge of the religion whether that is through reading the Qur’an or living in the chaos that is now the lives of Muslim majority countries due to both corruption and chaos and now of course for a long time the dropping of bombs (from Western countries) on those countries, feel themselves being drawn back to the hijab.

Also, I don’t doubt that there are cultures in various Muslim majority countries that lead families to pressure women into wearing the hijab not out of their free will. However, and this is an important point, I rarely do hear any coverage in any media outlet or anywhere about how Muslim women are being forced or blackmailed to not wear hijab by their families, and this happens far more frequently in the West; this not only happens to converts, but it also happens to Muslim families living in the West who might fear that their daughters never get married due to Muslim men not wanting to marry a hijab-clad woman or fear them being harassed due to Islamophobia. I frequently only encounter the latter type of scenarios being played out on English-speaking Muslim majority Islamic forums/boards as these boards/forums are inhabited predominantly by Muslims living in the West; and these Muslim women in the West then come out to seek advise of fellow Muslims on how to approach their families on these Muslim majority boards/forums. And of course, I will assume that almost all of you know how frequently discussions happen in the political arena about whether or not women living in the West should have a right to choose to dress themselves in hijab, burkini, or niqab as they wish if they do have a religious conviction on being covered or veiled.

Peace.
 
Yeah, the hijab is the most obvious indication that someone is a Muslim. It doesn't matter that it doesn't apply to all Muslims (it certainly wouldn't, men don't wear them!), but that no other symbol is anywhere near as common.

Likewise the Christian cross and the Jewish Star of David.

Maybe this is just me, but a crescent moon and star would have given me the hint.

Me too, but the crescent moon and star is nowhere as well known as the hajib.
 
LOL...she is 15. The reality is that the vast majority of Muslim woman wear a head scarf (hijab) in public. I agree that Muslim woman should be free to choose to cover or not cover their hair, but I hardly think that a head scarf is a sign of oppression. 50 years ago we had many Catholic nuns doing the same thing. Now the walking tent hijab is another thing and I think that is oppressive and disgusting. I found the Times art to be a tasteful blend of modern and yet respectful to most Muslims with covered hair, but also obviously with makeup.

Yes, we should encourage Muslim moderates to be public and open, but that also comes with accepting them where they are at. The Dums had no issue with HRC's Muslim staffer Huma Mahmood Abedin, and she is a shining example of a modern western Muslim woman, hair and all. The Repugs were the ones trying to taint it as something bad.

The Catholic church is simply another example of an oppresive culture. I'm not sure how that is an argument against the hijab symbolizing oppressive cultural gender norms.
I agree that the head scarf hijab is a cultural gender norm. I just don't agree that it is particularly oppressive (when voluntary). We all have cultural norms that we live and deal with. Woman in general cannot walk around in public places with nothing covering their breasts. Are they being oppressed, since men can? Yes, it is legal for woman to hang out topless in some places, but it is not the cultural norm. And I don't think that non-theists are going to impress Muslim women by telling them that their head scarf or hijab is a sign that they are oppressed. Supporting their rights to be who they are, and to be able to choose their own thing would be better IMPOV.


Also, I'm not sure what proportion of Muslim women wear a hijab, but my impression is that it varies pretty significantly by country of origin, and country of residence. I've almost never met an Iranian girl in the US who wears the hijab, but I've met a lot of Somalis who do.
Yes, it varies by ethnicity and culture...
 
Oh shit. Is it ever 'choice' when one is 'guided' under cover of religious authority to wear a particular garb? I mean really?

If the religion is a choice then complying with it's attire rules is a choice.

When walking away from the situation isn't an option it's not a choice. That was the problem in France that lead to the attempt to ban it--a "Muslim" woman who didn't wear it was liable to be attacked.
 
Oh shit. Is it ever 'choice' when one is 'guided' under cover of religious authority to wear a particular garb? I mean really?

If the religion is a choice then complying with it's attire rules is a choice.
Yep, in the US it is quite certainly a choice. A woman in this country chooses to marry her husband and her place of worship. Just as a person can choose to be part of the Missionary Baptists where woman have to wear dresses to the UMC where women lead the churches. Islam, Judaism, and Christianity all have liberal to conservative sects. Of course it is hard when family and friends can't deal with changing belief of a person, especially from conservative theologies to very liberal to none. Many of us here have very personal and painful experiences of exactly that. That does not un-make it a choice.
 
Back
Top Bottom