• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Yet more vote suppression -- closing polling places

lpetrich

Contributor
Joined
Jul 27, 2000
Messages
26,852
Location
Eugene, OR
Gender
Male
Basic Beliefs
Atheist
The GOP’s Sneakiest Voter Suppression Tactic | The New Republic
With Election Day approaching, an odd little story from Dodge City, Kansas, made headlines in The New York Times and The Washington Post last week. Local elections officials in the Wild West outpost of yore, now a meatpacking center that’s majority-Latino, had moved their lone voting place outside the city limits, more than a mile from the nearest bus stop, as anti-immigration crusader Kris Kobach—the state elections chief—was fighting off a strong Democratic challenge in his quest for the governorship.

... While another secretary of state overseeing his own election for governor, Kobach’s Georgia ally Brian Kemp, had been garnering scrutiny for months with his massive “purges” of registered black voters, and while reports on the perils of voter ID laws have become numbingly familiar, the Dodge City tale offered a colorful twist on the theme of race-based voter suppression. The Times editors couldn’t resist a cheeky headline for this saga: “To Cast Their Ballots, These Voters Will Have to Get Out of Dodge.”

But the only unusual thing about this story was that it made news at all. Over the past decade, Republican elections officials have been shuttering polling places in minority neighborhoods, low-income districts, and on college campuses at a feverish pace.
In 2008, the US had 132,000 polling places, but by 2016, over 15,000 of them were closed. Texas: 400 closed, Arizona: 200 closed, more per person than Texas. Indiana: more than 20% closed.
In North Carolina, Republicans have been more surgical in their approach, zeroing in on toss-up districts like majority-black Mecklenburg County, where young Democrat Dan McCready is trying to wrest away a vacant Republican seat in a tight House race. Mecklenburg is one of six counties in the state in which poll closures reduced black voter turnout by 50 percent or more in 2016.
Georgia? 200 closed.
And as The Atlanta Journal-Constitution revealed this summer (Kemp’s secretary of state office conveniently keeps no track of the closures), they correlate in near-perfect synchronicity with concentrations of high poverty rates across the state—the places where fewer people have cars to drive to the polls, where public transportation is often non-existent, and where African Americans vote Democratic.

The closures in Georgia could, just as surely as Kemp’s aggressive purges of registered black voters from the rolls, determine the outcome in his dead-heat race with Abrams. This is just pure coincidence, both the secretary of state and local elections officials insist—simply a matter of local Republicans making elections more “cost-efficient” by “consolidating” polling places in more “convenient” white neighborhoods.
Kemp's office even has a guide to polling-place closure.
Twice, the document notes, in bold type: ”As a result of the Shelby vs. Holder Supreme Court decision, you are no longer required to submit polling place changes to the Department of Justice for preclearance.” A particularly helpful section offers advice on how to sell the closures to the public, just in case anybody notices what’s happening before it’s too late to protest: “You can create a professional well thought out presentation,” it says, “showing ... how the changes can benefit the voters and public interest.” Neat!
Then the big controversy over polling-place closure in Randolph County, GA. But it also happened elsewhere in GA, like in Macon-Bibb County.
Like his Republican peers across the country, Gillon expressed dismay at the idea that this could be motivated by a desire to create new obstacles for particular voters. “That was the last thing we would consider as a reason for doing that,” he protested. “If the county had more money for us, we’d open up more polling places. We’d be happy to do that, but we have a county government whose budget is very strapped right now.” The intended savings, he said, would amount to $40,000 a year—about $3,000 for every proposed poll closure. The county’s annual budget is $161 million.

Few elections officials are as bracingly honest about their intentions as former Republican legislator Mike Bennett, who became supervisor of elections in Florida’s Manatee County after long lines had discouraged a lot of local voters in 2012. Long lines, often caused by “consolidating” several polling places into one, have been shown to discourage voters just as much as increased distances and lack of transportation. But Bennett set out to make them even longer by closing as many polling places as possible—30 percent of the county’s total. He’d already made his reasoning crystal clear: “Why would we make it any easier? I want ‘em to fight for it,” Bennett said in a 2011 speech, before being term-limited out of the legislature. “I want the people of the state of Florida to want to vote as bad as that person in Africa who’s willing to walk 200 miles.”

Black and Latino voters in Manatee weren’t willing to go to such lengths, as it turned out; a University of Florida study showed that their turnout dropped by 3 and 5 percent, respectively, after Bennett’s mass poll closures.
But if it was Republicans having difficulty voting, guess who would be howling about voter suppression?
 
What is the voting turnout like in those areas?
If people cannot be bothered to make the effort to turn up then it might it harder, though not impossible, to justify having all those polling places open.
 
It appears as if the attempts to suppress the vote in Georgia, may be be backfiring. Turnout has been huge in early voting. The Democrats have a very well organized campaign here with lots of volunteers and the enthusiasm is unlike anything I've ever seen before. Currently, the governor's race is in a dead heat, and as you probably know, per Georgia law, if neither candidate gets over 50%, we will have a run off in December. The libertarian candidate is polling at 2%, so that may be what happens. If so, we need to work at getting out the vote in December, but again, we will have three full weeks of early voting. I just hope our totally out of date voting machines don't get hacked.
 
It appears as if the attempts to suppress the vote in Georgia, may be be backfiring. Turnout has been huge in early voting. The Democrats have a very well organized campaign here with lots of volunteers and the enthusiasm is unlike anything I've ever seen before. Currently, the governor's race is in a dead heat, and as you probably know, per Georgia law, if neither candidate gets over 50%, we will have a run off in December. The libertarian candidate is polling at 2%, so that may be what happens. If so, we need to work at getting out the vote in December, but again, we will have three full weeks of early voting. I just hope our totally out of date voting machines don't get hacked.

In this day and age?
 
What is the voting turnout like in those areas?
If people cannot be bothered to make the effort to turn up then it might it harder, though not impossible, to justify having all those polling places open.

Good question. Sounds like a spiral. Not many people are voting, so lets save money by closing a few polling places, which results in even fewer people voting, etc.
 
What is the voting turnout like in those areas?
If people cannot be bothered to make the effort to turn up then it might it harder, though not impossible, to justify having all those polling places open.

If that's the case, then the district should waste money by having open polling places which people don't use. They need to provide everybody with the ability to vote easily if they choose to do so. It's fine for them to not make that choice, but it should be readily available for those who do and the government needs to eat any costs incurred so as to provide this.
 
Businesses close non-performing sites because that's good for business.

When people think that government should be run like a business, then this sort of behavior is expected. If you believe that closing polling sites makes it harder on people who are likely to vote for the opposition, then that's just icing on the cake.
 

Thus the attempts to make it more difficult for Dems to vote is a good strategy for Republicans.

Didn't Killery use that excuse as well?

Calling it an excuse seems to imply you mean it's not happening. I know right wingers generally have a problem with reality but that couldn't be you, could it?
 
What is the voting turnout like in those areas?
If people cannot be bothered to make the effort to turn up then it might it harder, though not impossible, to justify having all those polling places open.
You are aware of something becoming self-propelled? Lines are long, some people won't vote, so close more polls to make lines even longer. I don't recall hearing about how there were tens of thousands of near empty polls in America in the 2008 election.
 
What is the voting turnout like in those areas?
If people cannot be bothered to make the effort to turn up then it might it harder, though not impossible, to justify having all those polling places open.

Good question. Sounds like a spiral. Not many people are voting, so lets save money by closing a few polling places, which results in even fewer people voting, etc.

People were voting in the places that Randolph country unsuccessfully tried to close down. Randolph is a county with a high rate of poverty. The places that they tried to close down were in areas of the county that were mostly black. There were people who walked to their polling places, and don't have cars. The places they wanted to shut down were at least 20 miles away from the black community. I'm pretty sure it was the ACLU that successfully sued a few months ago, and the polling places in Randolph county were kept open. Randolph is a rural county and there is no public transportation available.

The ACLU in Georgia has been helping due to the obvious attempts to suppress the minority vote. A week or two ago, a federal judge ruled that absentee ballots couldn't be thrown out without notifying the voter, so they could vote in person. These ballots were being thrown out due to an insane rule put in by Kemp that the signatures had to be exact matches of other documents. So, when did poll workers become experts are handwriting analysts? Kemp is a disgusting POS who has made many obvious attempts to suppress the minority vote. Don't get me started. :mad:
 
I applied for an absentee ballot in Georgia six weeks ago. The Secretary of State office is holding ~50,000 applications for absentee ballots for "signature matching" reasons. My wife called the Secretary of State's office to see why we hadn't received our ballots and if our's is being held up. They told her that they couldn't look up our application specifically because the matching is done at the county level, but that in general, they are running a little bit late in getting "some" of the absentee ballots out, to just wait.

See here.

I was not able to vote in the 2010 election because of the voter ID law. I faced ridiculous requirements both in Georgia and in Texas where I was born to get a birth certificate that my county clerk would accept. It wasn't until the courts in the two states threw out the more ridiculous requirements that I was able to get a voter ID card.

I was forced to surrender my driver's license because of my disability. I could have voted forever with just the driver's license, but the fact that I had had a driver's license didn't qualify me to get a voter's ID card. It makes no sense.

I am afraid that it seems to be happening again to me. I will try to vote at my local polling place but I am likely to have to vote in a provisional ballot, again. Fortunately, we live in a majority white, Republican voting precinct so our polling place hasn't been closed.
 
I was forced to surrender my driver's license because of my disability. I could have voted forever with just the driver's license, but the fact that I had had a driver's license didn't qualify me to get a voter's ID card. It makes no sense.

How about going to your DMV and getting a 'Non-Drivers ID'? Every DMV I've ever been to has had them available. They are accepted as Government-issued ID equivalent to Drivers Licenses (except, of course, you can't drive with them). Surely the voting-bureaucracy would accept them.
 
It is cute that Americans think they have a democracy.

To be fair, most of them realize that they don't have a democracy, but they're just too ambivalent to care, much less do something about it.
To be fair, at this point, even getting out to vote may not help. It's getting to the point where the only solution is going to be violence, possibly a full on revolution, but the apathy is high enough that that option is likely a long way off still.
 
A federal judge just announced that 3100 citizens of Georgia can't be denied the right to vote. This is only a small percentage of the 51000 that Kemp is trying to deny the right to vote, but there could be more rulings. I'm watching this as I write, so I don't know all of the exact details. I think it has something to do with the rule that says that there must be an exact match on the ID and the voter registration. In other words, if somebody misspelled your name on your driver's license or voter registration, Kemp was trying to deny your right to vote. This can be a little as a missing middle initial or one letter that doesn't match.

And, yes, to OWIP and Simple Don. There is an ID that anyone can get at any driver's license office. You will need a birth certificate and I think some evidence of your current address. That can be a utility bill or anything similar as long as it has your name and address on it. One of my former patients had to get one because most doctors require such IDs in Georgia these days. Hope it's not too late for you to get that ID.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom