• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

How should west respond to potential (likely) Russian invasion of Ukraine?

I have no roblem with Kerry admitting that. Neither do I question it.
No, that's not how it works either. You have to explicitly comment after you request a link proof. You (people in general here) have a habit of not doing that.
 
Man, that is a tremendous amount of spin. We aren't not not winning, we are just being deliberate... in shelling apartments, hospitals, transportation hubs...
Yep!
Just because CNN says so, does not mean it IS so. After all they are self admitted liars.
Seriously, why would Russian forces waste expensive ammo on non-millitary targets in vastly prio-russian regions?
Yeah, the liars you follow never admit to it.
Maybe. maybe not. But you certainly follow liars who pee on your shoes and say "So what? I peed on you shoes"
I'm allowed to say "you peed on my shoes." You're not. You don't seem to understand that major difference.
Actually I see the difference. You keep following these liars.
 
I have no roblem with Kerry admitting that. Neither do I question it.
No, that's not how it works either. You have to explicitly comment after you request a link proof. You (people in general here) have a habit of not doing that.
What did your link prove?
 
Man, that is a tremendous amount of spin. We aren't not not winning, we are just being deliberate... in shelling apartments, hospitals, transportation hubs...
Yep!
Just because CNN says so, does not mean it IS so. After all they are self admitted liars.
Seriously, why would Russian forces waste expensive ammo on non-millitary targets in vastly prio-russian regions?
Yeah, the liars you follow never admit to it.
Maybe. maybe not. But you certainly follow liars who pee on your shoes and say "So what? I peed on you shoes"
I'm allowed to say "you peed on my shoes." You're not. You don't seem to understand that major difference.
Actually I see the difference. You keep following these liars.
That we are allowed to criticize our media and choose other sources for news is what helps keep our media generally honest. You cannot do so. Any member of your media critical of your government risks personal harm. That you accept that as fine and dandy and then respread the disinformation the government provided for you unquestioningly is quite astounding.
 
I have no roblem with Kerry admitting that. Neither do I question it.
No, that's not how it works either. You have to explicitly comment after you request a link proof. You (people in general here) have a habit of not doing that.
What did your link prove?
It does not matter what it proved. You requested a link, means it was important to you.
You have to comment. And you (people here) don't.
That happens all the time even with easily searchable links. I consider it highly disrespectful. I have never been caught making shit up. Because I don't.
 
That'd be a retired lieutenant-general Trevor Cadieu. He was to take over Canadian Military, but a sexual misconduct accusation came forth back in 2021
Sending to Ukraine was his punishment?
Dishonest editing to make a point. Makes you a real winner, doesn't it.
I did not edit anything
You edited Jimmy Higgins' quote where he said the general was acting as a private citizen. You know we can see this, right?
 
That we are allowed to criticize our media and choose other sources for news is what helps keep our media generally honest. You cannot do so.
Yes. But you don't criticize your media, even they pee on your shoes and call it a pee.
 
That'd be a retired lieutenant-general Trevor Cadieu. He was to take over Canadian Military, but a sexual misconduct accusation came forth back in 2021
Sending to Ukraine was his punishment?
Dishonest editing to make a point. Makes you a real winner, doesn't it.
I did not edit anything
You edited Jimmy Higgins' quote where he said the general was acting as a private citizen. You know we can see this, right?
No, I did not edit anything. Why would I even do that? what for?
retired == private.

I admit I did not know that and don't really care.
 
I have no roblem with Kerry admitting that. Neither do I question it.
No, that's not how it works either. You have to explicitly comment after you request a link proof. You (people in general here) have a habit of not doing that.
What did your link prove?
It does not matter what it proved. You requested a link, means it was important to you.
I requested a link to CNN admitting they were lying. You've yet to provide it.
You have to comment. And you (people here) don't.
That happens all the time even with easily searchable links. I consider it highly disrespectful. I have never been caught making shit up. Because I don't.
We don't have to do shit because you say so.

And many people have commented on your links, especially the Mearscheimer link.
 
That we are allowed to criticize our media and choose other sources for news is what helps keep our media generally honest. You cannot do so.
Yes. But you don't criticize your media, even they pee on your shoes and call it a pee.
:rolleyes:
And Media Bias Fact check. And Letters To The Editor, which almost every newspaper publishes.
 
And many people have commented on your links, especially the Mearscheimer link.
Ehhhh. no. Well, maybe one a little bit, and not the one you think (the one I put on ignore list for that)
All my links end up with crickets. So no more soup links for you!
 
Last edited:
That'd be a retired lieutenant-general Trevor Cadieu. He was to take over Canadian Military, but a sexual misconduct accusation came forth back in 2021.
I am fucking quoting it again without any editing!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What the fuck is wrong with you?!!!!
Fuck. I selected partial quote - the whole damn sentence, not the whole damn message. I am, fucking allowed to do that!
I did not edit anything!
I am fucking putting you on ignore! Don't bother to apologize!
 
Last edited:
Well, the 'editing' is the quote-mining.
That'd be a retired lieutenant-general Trevor Cadieu. He was to take over Canadian Military, but a sexual misconduct accusation came forth back in 2021
Sending to Ukraine was his punishment?


What I said was:
That'd be a retired lieutenant-general Trevor Cadieu. He was to take over Canadian Military, but a sexual misconduct accusation came forth back in 2021. He was allegedly over there as a private citizen. There is no Canadian news link confirming or even suggesting his capture.


You edited Jimmy Higgins' quote where he said the general was acting as a private citizen. You know we can see this, right?
No, I did not edit anything. Why would I even do that? what for?
retired == private.

I admit I did not know that and don't really care.
I stated several things that you pretended wasn't there.
1) retired due to scandal
2) private citizen
3) allegedly went to Ukraine
4) CBC has nothing suggesting he was captured.

So, the whole point you were trying to make about a Canadien General being captured was shown to be misleading at best, and your retort was to distract from your accusation, at least in part, being debunked.
 
Back
Top Bottom