• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Bidengate Breaks... err... down

it had to be censored.
I don’t think that word means what you think it means.
"Censorship" and "cancelled" are two of the right's many "we're the REAL victims here!" words. Apparently Twizzler thinks that if he flips from an hour long Sean Hannity Special Report on Hunter's Laptop over to MSNBC and Rachel Maddow isn't delivering a mea culpa as she nods her head to Hannity's "revelations," then the story is being "censored" and only truly objective news outlets like the Daily Mail and the Daily Wire are covering it.

Fox not covering the first day of the January 6th hearings when every other news outlet was? That's not censorship, or even bias! It's just Fair and Balanced!
 
it had to be censored.
I don’t think that word means what you think it means.
Perhaps censor is too strong but Twitter and Facebook did suppress the dissemination of the story on their platforms. and CNN declared it a Russian misinformation hit piece along with 50 former FBI staff. CNN would have been more credible had they just ignored the story.
“Perhaps”?

It is not censorship when private companies make a decision about how their assets are used. You can thank conservatives for getting rid of the Fairness Doctrine.
 
it had to be censored.
I don’t think that word means what you think it means.
Perhaps censor is too strong but Twitter and Facebook did suppress the dissemination of the story on their platforms. and CNN declared it a Russian misinformation hit piece along with 50 former FBI staff. CNN would have been more credible had they just ignored the story.
“Perhaps”?

It is not censorship when private companies make a decision about how their assets are used. You can thank conservatives for getting rid of the Fairness Doctrine.
Yep...even if the FD was still in effect, it wouldn't be applied to social media platforms. People should never consider these outlets as "news."
 
Some on the left rightly assumed that the Hunter Biden "laptop existence"* was a nothing burger designed to distract people from the issues.
Such a “nothing burger” that it had to be censored.

Some assumed that the republicans pushing this were full of shit and that they wouldn't produce real evidence. And guess what - they were 1,000 percent correct!

Evidence of what?

The laptop and texts paint a very revealing picture of the tawdry Biden shenanigans. I don’t know why you’re having such a conniption about your guy and his dysfunctional family being revealed for the corrupt crooks they are and you are fine with the press being complicit in running interference for them. TDS seems to last forever.
My favorite part about the laptop is how almost nothing we've seen being alleged about Hunter Biden seem to be files one would find on a laptop. Just media stuff.
 
I suppose that Harry's point is that you spend a great deal more time on "Bidengate" than all of Donald Trump's scandals, even though there is very little meat to chew on when it comes to Hunter Biden, his father, and Chinese/Russian businessmen.

Is there a rule that I am breaking such that my time must be distributed evenly across corrupt politicians?
The problem is you keep pointing to a match and screaming "Fire!" while ignoring the bonfire.
 
I would dispute how much time and effort I put into this tawdry story but I’m otherwise tied up trawling “right wing” tabloids looking for Hunter and Big Guy material. But the effort I expend is far less than the effort you spent ranting and raving about right wingers and me.

How come Brandon’s family not only gets a free pass from the media. Not only that but they denied the laptop’s experience and then tried to censor it?

Oh, and meth fiend Hunter just doesn’t seem to be a very nice guy and his dad is up to his neck in his business dealings.
We ignore the laptop because it looked planted.
 
it had to be censored.
I don’t think that word means what you think it means.
Perhaps censor is too strong but Twitter and Facebook did suppress the dissemination of the story on their platforms. and CNN declared it a Russian misinformation hit piece along with 50 former FBI staff. CNN would have been more credible had they just ignored the story.

Simple problem: The numbers don't add up. What repair was he doing??? I would expect to be charged something like that simply for imaging before considering any repair--and I can't imagine what repair would warrant imaging and be that cheap. And why is the image still around? Images are big--if he's keeping around images of all the systems he's working on he's got a massive storage system.

At best this is a case of parallel construction, but it's much more likely been messed with. There is no way to show that it hasn't been tampered with and thus it has no value as evidence. Nothing that could be found on it would be of any value without independent confirmation--at best it's a starting point of where to look for evidence, but it isn't evidence itself.
 
Does anyone believe Biden when he says he knows nothing about his son's financial doings?

Does anyone believe Hunter Biden did not get a position on an energy company in Ukraine because he was Biden's kid?

Does anyone believe Hunter Biden is not trading on and pedaling influence based on his father?

Does anyone believe the Earth is flat?
 
Does anyone believe Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner were qualified to work in the White House?
 
I do not see a lot of difference between Hunter Biden and Jared Kushner.

Both trade on family names. Both involved in shady business deals. Niter would have gotten anywhere without family connections.

I heard it said Kushner married into the family thinking he was marrying wealth, only to find out Trump was in perpetual financial trouble.
 
Back
Top Bottom