• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

A day without stupid?

I just can't get over how much makeup she is wearing.
I still haven't gotten over how much makeup Agent Orange would wear for his day to day appearances. But then again, he looks just as hideous without makeup, so there is that. Stormy, really, you did that?
 
I still haven't gotten over how much makeup Agent Orange would wear for his day to day appearances. But then again, he looks just as hideous without makeup, so there is that. Stormy, really, you did that?
There was the initial unknown sum plus $130,000 hush money for at most 5 minutes work. Fuck, I'd do that as well.
 


FaoEUbYWAAEG7_l
 

That appears to be a 'guest' SSID, so it should have very limited access to the network. Given the woefully simple password, you would certainly hope that was the case. Most WiFi routers have 'standard' and 'guest' SSIDs, where 'guest' basically has access to nothing apart from the external internet connection; It would be possible but incredibly foolish to set up the security cameras to be accessible from 'guest'.

Typically the 'guest' SSID is used where you want to give large numbers of low-trust users Internet access (such as at a resort or bar), but don't want to give them access to other devices on your LAN.
 

That appears to be a 'guest' SSID, so it should have very limited access to the network. Given the woefully simple password, you would certainly hope that was the case. Most WiFi routers have 'standard' and 'guest' SSIDs, where 'guest' basically has access to nothing apart from the external internet connection; It would be possible but incredibly foolish to set up the security cameras to be accessible from 'guest'.

Typically the 'guest' SSID is used where you want to give large numbers of low-trust users Internet access (such as at a resort or bar), but don't want to give them access to other devices on your LAN.

Well, I doubt now that people are attacking the networks, now that someone tweeted the idea to try, that they'll be kept out for long.

They had top secret classified documents in an unlocked room that literally anyone with the money to stay there could walk into any time, after which they secured it with a lock that could be popped practically by looking at it.

And you think they secured or structured their network properly. (Actually, I don't expect you think that.)
 
I just can't get over how much makeup she is wearing.
Why do so many people pay so much more attention to a female presenter's appearance than to a male's? My attention was drawn to what Alison Steinberg said and how she said it. There appeared to be a conscious, much practised attempt to emulate Fucker Carlson's presentation style.

She was criticized for wearing too much makeup. Same criticism aimed at Donald Trump. Rudy Guilianj was criticized for his makeup, cheap hair dye.
 

That appears to be a 'guest' SSID, so it should have very limited access to the network. Given the woefully simple password, you would certainly hope that was the case. Most WiFi routers have 'standard' and 'guest' SSIDs, where 'guest' basically has access to nothing apart from the external internet connection; It would be possible but incredibly foolish to set up the security cameras to be accessible from 'guest'.

Typically the 'guest' SSID is used where you want to give large numbers of low-trust users Internet access (such as at a resort or bar), but don't want to give them access to other devices on your LAN.

Well, I doubt now that people are attacking the networks, now that someone tweeted the idea to try, that they'll be kept out for long.

They had top secret classified documents in an unlocked room that literally anyone with the money to stay there could walk into any time, after which they secured it with a lock that could be popped practically by looking at it.

And you think they secured or structured their network properly. (Actually, I don't expect you think that.)

Yeah, I said it would be "incredibly stupid" for them not to have.

Given the number of incredibly stupid things they are obviously and indisputably doing, that strongly implies that they didn't.

I can assure you that I don't think it's wise to trust the people who kept top secret documents in an unlocked store cupboard in a tourist resort to have even the most basic clue about wifi network security.
 
Ya my home router has a Guest access password. I give it to trudted guests. I wouldn't post it on twitter. I'm not as stupid as Eric Trump. His history is that of stupidity.
 
Man, how do they expose all of our secrets so quickly. Next thing you know, they'll be TikTok'ing about those mysterious camps we put up in Upstate New York to re-educate Trump supporters into communistic Biden supporters and Soros-Bots.

But I suppose the good news is, they think it won't actually be Trump, so when he does go to trial, they'll be laughing at the libs. Though, they might start wondering why Trump isn't Truth'ing no more.
 

That appears to be a 'guest' SSID, so it should have very limited access to the network. Given the woefully simple password, you would certainly hope that was the case. Most WiFi routers have 'standard' and 'guest' SSIDs, where 'guest' basically has access to nothing apart from the external internet connection; It would be possible but incredibly foolish to set up the security cameras to be accessible from 'guest'.

Typically the 'guest' SSID is used where you want to give large numbers of low-trust users Internet access (such as at a resort or bar), but don't want to give them access to other devices on your LAN.

The chosen password speaks to the quality of controls segmenting the internal and external networks... I am positive that a lateral attack would be possible
 
link
article said:
Trump's legal team filed a lawsuit asking a judge to stop the Department of Justice from going through the materials that were seized.

The lawsuit detailed the raid and stated that what happened on August 8 was a "shockingly aggressive move" and that there was "no understanding of the distress that it would cause most Americans."
Distress? I'm in distress that he has fallen through a large meat grinder, but I don't see him doing anything about helping me with that distress.

article said:
In the 27-page lawsuit, his legal team claimed the search was politically motivated and identified Trump as "the clear frontrunner in the 2024 Republican Presidential Primary and in the 2024 General Election, should he decide to run."
Jebus! Even in ridiculous legal filings, he can't stop with the bravado.

Trump: Make certain you include the that I'm the: clear frontrunner in the 2024 Republican Presidential Primary and in the 2024 General Election.... umm... should I decide to run... and umm... all the women love to be in bed with me.
Lawyer: We aren't adding that.
Trump: What about just the last part?
Lawyer: NO!
Trump: The first two?
Lawyer: Fine.... *click*
Trump: Most bestest Primary candidate ever. .... .... man... woman... camera... tv...
 
Back
Top Bottom