Yeah, somebody was clueless about the Scunthorpe problem. They're probably not so clueless anymore.Stanford University pulled the proposal - Stanford pulls language list , so the dystopian fantasies can stop now.
Yeah, somebody was clueless about the Scunthorpe problem. They're probably not so clueless anymore.Stanford University pulled the proposal - Stanford pulls language list , so the dystopian fantasies can stop now.
Everyone should be bothered by this; that our once great universities are wasting time and money on such complete bullshit.A lot of people got butt hurt from this list. Perhaps White Christian Conservatives should now get some reparations due to this list of suggested words in certain contexts for the I.T. department at a private university.
When were they great, and what made them great?our once great universities
Oh, right. Stanford contributed nothing to America’s economic and technological success. My bad.When were they great, and what made them great?our once great universities
My oh my, you are fickle.Stanford contributed nothing to America’s economic and technological success. My bad.
"Once great"? Stanford is still one of the top universities in the world, let alone in the nation (at least according to US News and World Reports - Stanford one of top universities in the worldEveryone should be bothered by this; that our once great universities are wasting time and money on such complete bullshit.A lot of people got butt hurt from this list. Perhaps White Christian Conservatives should now get some reparations due to this list of suggested words in certain contexts for the I.T. department at a private university.
Everyone should be bothered by this; that our once great universities are wasting time and money on such complete bullshit.A lot of people got butt hurt from this list. Perhaps White Christian Conservatives should now get some reparations due to this list of suggested words in certain contexts for the I.T. department at a private university.
Then why is it diverting resources to police speech?“Once great"? Stanford is still one of the top universities in the world, let alone in the nation (at least according to US News and World Reports
What resources, exactly? And what are they 'diverting' it from? You've been informed that volunteers did most of the work.Then why is it diverting resources to police speech?“Once great"? Stanford is still one of the top universities in the world, let alone in the nation (at least according to US News and World Reports
It never was about policing speech. There was no enforcement mechanism in their suggestions. And Stanford University dropped the proposed suggestions. So it never diverted resources to policing speech .Then why is it diverting resources to police speech?“Once great"? Stanford is still one of the top universities in the world, let alone in the nation (at least according to US News and World Reports
Probably about the same amount of time as it took for Oleg to conclude that his speech was being policed.I have no idea how much time and effort it took those who came up with proposal.
As was obvious and inevitable if you know anything about how the university system in the US actually works....And Stanford University dropped the proposed suggestions
Was I serious or sarcastic? Does it matter?So, listing 'problematic' words and suggesting substitutions is bad, but banning words is good?
Is that our takeaway in this thread?
So, listing 'problematic' words and suggesting substitutions is bad, but banning words is good?
Is that our takeaway in this thread?