You didn’t ask a serious question.
I asked if anyone could provide an example of evolution contradicting the Bible.
You keep saying, “These examples don’t contradict Biblical kinds,” but never once do you address how they don’t.
They don't evolve into something else. They only change.
You’ve defined a kind as a group that can interbreed and produce fertile offspring. Ring species violate that — and you ignored it.
Do they become something else? Show me.
You said kinds have natural limits — nylon-eating bacteria evolved a brand-new enzyme never seen before in their lineage.
Do they become something else?
You didn’t touch it. You were shown Tiktaalik, predicted by evolutionary theory, with traits from both fish and tetrapods — directly contradicting Genesis’s creation sequence.
Do they become something else?
The warbler ring species meets your exact criteria for crossing that boundary: a single population diverges gradually, and the two end populations — despite descending from the same source — can no longer interbreed.
Do they become something else? I believe I even asked you.
That’s not “variation.” That’s reproductive isolation — the very line you claimed defines kinds. If that doesn’t count as a contradiction, then your definition of “kind” is so elastic it can stretch over any evidence and pretend nothing happened.
Your word games don't work for me. I don't care what you call it or how you classify it. Does it become something else?
This isn’t a debate over interpretation anymore.
I've told you several times, there was no debate.
According to the source you linked, a “Biblical kind” is defined as a group where organisms can interbreed and produce fertile offspring, and the boundary is crossed when fertility between groups ceases. You admit variation can happen within kinds, but claim there’s a natural limit before it becomes “something else.”
Show me something that becomes something else. Stop wasting my time with your petty ego.
Just one thing. One word. One paragraph with no more than 3 lines of text.
NO BULLSHIT
You keep shouting, “Do they become something else?!” as if repeating the question will erase the fact that it’s already been answered — precisely, concisely, and on your terms.
You asked for one word.
Tiktaalik.
You asked for one paragraph.
It’s a transitional fossil with both fish and land-animal traits — gills, fins, and scales, but also a neck, lungs, and wrist bones. Found in 375-million-year-old rock, exactly where evolutionary theory predicted. Genesis says land animals were created separately from sea creatures. Tiktaalik shows land animals descended from them. That’s one thing becoming something else.
Now you’re stomping around pretending you haven’t seen it. Not because it wasn’t delivered, but because it shattered your entire premise — that there is no contradiction between evolution and the Bible. You didn’t refute the example. You didn’t even engage it. You just went back to yelling the question louder.
But shouting “DO THEY BECOME SOMETHING ELSE?!” after being handed a direct, textbook example is not a challenge. It’s a tantrum.
And here’s the truth:
You built a test you thought no one could pass.
You thought you’d expose ignorance, or ideology, or fear.
But what got exposed was the trap itself — and the desperation of the person who set it.
Tiktaalik is one thing becoming something else.
Speciation in ring species is one thing becoming something else.
Bacteria evolving new enzymes is one thing becoming something else.
Pseudogenes and viral DNA passed from ancestor to descendant are one thing becoming something else.
That’s not word games. That’s evolutionary biology. That’s reality.
You didn’t get silence.
You didn’t get confusion.
You got exactly what you asked for — and now the only thing left to yell is “NO BULLSHIT” because the evidence left you no ground to stand on.
So here it is, one last time:
Tiktaalik.
One word.
One fossil.
One fatal contradiction.
You lost your own game.
And now you’re just shouting at the scoreboard.
NHC
