Welcome to IIDB, NoHolyCows
For me im not pretending anything. I’m rejecting your attempt to erase the distinction between a militant organization and 2.2 million civilians—because that erasure is precisely how mass atrocities get justified.
I said that pood was pretending. And I am not erasing this distinction. But Hamas and other terror groups that attacked Israel are the ones endangering their civilian population. First, by starting this war, and second, by hiding and operating from amongst the civilian population. Like this rocket launcher (that shoots unguided missiles at Israeli cities) situated in the midst of a tent encampment.
You say Hamas is “an integral part of Gazan society.” What does that mean, exactly?
It means that it is not some outside force imposed on Gazans. It was founded in Gaza. Most of its leadership is Gazan. And Hamas enjoys a lot of support in Gaza.
That every child, doctor, teacher, and grandmother is fair game? That every bomb dropped on a home is just “defense” because someone in Gaza voted 18 years ago?
Of course not! But blame lies with Gaza, which started this war of aggression, and conducts in in a way that puts its own population in undue danger.
Gaza hasn’t had elections since 2006. Over half the population wasn’t even alive then. Are they “integral to Hamas” too?
Many of them are. You don't need to vote in formal election to support Hamas, to join it, or to attack Israel wearing the green Hamas headband.
Yes, some non-Hamas actors likely participated in October 7. But again: that doesn’t justify obliterating the entire population. That’s not justice. That’s collective punishment—a war crime under Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.
Even according to Hamas casualty numbers, only about 2.5% of Gaza's population has been killed so far, far cry from "obliterating the entire population". And again, there are so many dead because of actions of Hamas and their allies.
Another thing. Even using Hamas' own numbers, military age males are greatly overrepresented among. Just before the recent ceasefire, I downloaded a list of all fatalities as reported by Hamas, with name, sex and age. I then made this:
Note first that we should discount age 0 as a glitch. It seems that Hamas MOH put "0" whenever age was unknown.
But besides that, we see that the female fatality distribution follows the population pyramid, as it tapers off, as you would expect from random civilian casualties of war. But male fatalities show a distinct bulge from teens through 40s, i.e. military age (Hamas et al recruit them young).
And again, these are Hamas' own figures. The true numbers are probably even more skewed toward military age males.
You’re not talking about defense. You’re arguing for guilt by geography. By that logic, every American should’ve been fair game after Abu Ghraib.
I am not arguing for guilt by geography. I am saying that in a war, you will have civilian casualties and fatalities. Especially when the enemy violates the laws of war and operates from civilian areas, such as the humanitaries Al Mawasi area, or from a tunnel underneath a hospital.
Every Israeli a target after Sabra and Shatila.
Wasn't that attack committed by a Lebanese Christian militia?
Besides, every Israeli is already a target of Palestinian, Hezbollah and Houthi terrorists.
You don’t believe that, and you’d call it terrorism if someone tried it.
Deliberately attacking a civilian population is fundamentally different from collateral damage in warfare. Especially when civilians are deliberately endangered by the other party in the conflict.
Hamas’s Sinwar said to laud high civilian death toll in Gaza as ‘necessary sacrifice’
This isn’t about denying Hamas’s integration into the political reality of Gaza.
For pood it is, since he keeps making a distinction that does not exist in reality.
It’s about refusing to accept your logic that being born in Gaza is a death sentence. That’s not defense. That’s extermination.
It is not a "death sentence", but it is a dangerous place with a lot of suffering. Not unlike Berlin in 1945.
At least Nazi Germany eventually capitulated and gave up their arms.
And you can dress it up however you like—but history will remember that argument for what it is.
The argument is not that Gazan civilians are fair game, but that their suffering is the direct result of their government's actions. Both in starting and in prosecuting this war.