This is a false equivalence. There is no comparison between a country defending itself from naked aggression and genocidal terrorist groups hellbent on eradicating Israel.
Don't be absurd. Israel was imposed upon people whether they liked it or not. They have fought against the eradication of their polity by the imposition of an entirely artificial state on their land ever since it happened.
Both sides are fighting for survival against an enemy who are hellbent on their destruction.
Your having picked a side doesn't make a shred of difference, and doesn't make your preferred side better or right.
Both sides are being arseholes to the other; Neither is justified in being so.
Israel has all the advantages; Palestinians are left with terrorism or defeat as their only options.
There are no good guys; But pretending that the Palestinians are the
only bad guys makes you the arsehole.
What the fuck gives anyone, who doesn't even know who Mo Mowlam is, the right to an opinion on an apparently irresolvable asymmetrical conflict? Seriously, she literally wrote the fucking book on how to get two sides with irreconcilable differences to reconcile their differences.
Fuck picking sides. I'm on the side of not letting powerful people ride roughshod over everyone else, and then act totally shocked when they arc up and start being terrorists about it.
Should Palestinians kill Israeli civilians? Fuck no. Should anyone be surprised if they do? Also fuck no. Should internet based armchair experts with no clue about the recent history of resolving such conflicts be allowed to get away with the absurd claim that any violence in the affected region is "unprovoked"? Fucking fuck hell shit bastard NO!
Take your simplistic OP and shove it up your Gaza Strip.
The one thing we can say with certainty is that the problems of the Israeli-Palestine conflict are not due to an insufficiently violent retaliation by either side.