Sure. The women’s memories are hazy because of alcohol but Kav’s are perfectly clear although he was drunk and had a lot more at stake.
Nobody is saying his memory is "perfectly clear". But Ramirez admitted that her memory is hazy. And yet you still insist it must have happened and that Kav is guilty.
Again, for the millionth time:
CNN said:
On the night of the alleged incident, Ramirez admits to being drunk and, since then, having gaps in her memory. According to The New Yorker, “she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty.”
The magazine reported that it took six days of “carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney” for Ramirez to go on record accusing Kavanaugh.” The Times reported that Ramirez had contacted several of her former classmates to see if they remembered the incident because she could not be certain that Kavanaugh had been the perpetrator. CNN has not been able to find any firsthand eyewitnesses to corroborate her story.[/B]
If she doesn't know what happened, or who did it, I fail to see how you can know all that.
Multiple women Abd ig if I remember some of his make friends backed up at least one account.
I think all that they back up is that was drinking a lot when young. There is no corroboration of any of the specific claims, but we have exculpatory evidence of Ramirez admitting that she wasn't sure it was even Kav who did anything, and Swetnick backtracking about what she actually observed.
Even if anything happened, there just isn't any evidence.