Trump to Address Nation Tonight

[Elixir]

I don't know why you would say the MSM would take it seriously, I doubt that.

They didn't air it (so I hear) but they're sure as hell be talking about it. (MSNBC or whatever they renamed it). Ripe fruit for ridicule.
The numbers 47, 86 and 25 seem to come up with considerable frequency.
If you had your choice, Swiz, would you like to see Trump complete his term and his agenda, or would some other outcome be preferred?

 

[Colonel Sanders]

Watching and hearing Trump speak on any issue is like eating charred snails.

I don't know about that, I have never eaten charred snails. I did have Escargots à la Bourguignonne years ago and thought it was ok but that's the one and only time I have eaten snails.

He's always been horrible, is horrible now, and will always be horrible. He'll tell provable lies, sputter nonsensical shit like a 2nd grader trying to describe astrophysics, and none of it will change any of his supporter's minds. Mainstream news will treat it seriously, while his propaganda outlets will treat it like the Gettysburg address. {snip}

I'm not sure who you are referring to here when you say MSM, but I assume you mean the big networks. Hardly any of the networks broadcast Trump's speech. Some of them may have made it available on their streaming platforms but I don't think any of the big networks actually broadcast it. And I don't know why you would say the MSM would take it seriously, I doubt that.

1. One does not have to eat charred snails to understand they'd be awful.

2. The MSM, which use to attempt to be responsible and ethical has found itself trying to accommodate the most reprehensible POTUS in American history. Their very existence has been threatened by Trump. He's actually sued these spineless fucks yet some of them went blank when it came to endorsing a presidential candidate. They simply bowed the fuck out. The cunts refer to themselves as "The Fourth Estate" yet vacate the responsibilities the term implies by failing to sound the alarm bell if things might get hard for them.

They've been cowed; threatened into complicity by an authoritarian pool of vomit. Fox News figured out how to reach people, yet the spineless pricks at formerly legitimate networks can't find their ass with both hands.

 

[TSwizzle]

Watching and hearing Trump speak on any issue is like eating charred snails.

I don't know about that, I have never eaten charred snails. I did have Escargots à la Bourguignonne years ago and thought it was ok but that's the one and only time I have eaten snails.

He's always been horrible, is horrible now, and will always be horrible. He'll tell provable lies, sputter nonsensical shit like a 2nd grader trying to describe astrophysics, and none of it will change any of his supporter's minds. Mainstream news will treat it seriously, while his propaganda outlets will treat it like the Gettysburg address. {snip}

I'm not sure who you are referring to here when you say MSM, but I assume you mean the big networks. Hardly any of the networks broadcast Trump's speech. Some of them may have made it available on their streaming platforms but I don't think any of the big networks actually broadcast it. And I don't know why you would say the MSM would take it seriously, I doubt that.

1. One does not have to eat charred snails to understand they'd be awful.

I looked up "charred snails". Seems quite a common dish and quite popular. I understand it may not be to everyone's taste but have you tried charred snails? Can't be any worse than Taco Bell I say.

2. The MSM, which use to attempt to be responsible and ethical has found itself trying to accommodate the most reprehensible POTUS in American history. Their very existence has been threatened by Trump. He's actually sued these spineless fucks yet some of them went blank when it came to endorsing a presidential candidate. They simply bowed the fuck out. The cunts refer to themselves as "The Fourth Estate" yet vacate the responsibilities the term implies by failing to sound the alarm bell if things might get hard for them.

As I said earlier, most of the networks didn't broadcast Trump's speech so I don't know how you would perceive that as somehow accommodating him. I would say that is the opposite of accommodating him. Anything I have read about Trump's speech (not much granted) has said he's full of shit. As far as I can see, the MSM have never accommodated Trump on anything, quite the opposite.

They've been cowed; threatened into complicity by an authoritarian pool of vomit. Fox News figured out how to reach people, yet the spineless pricks at formerly legitimate networks can't find their ass with both hands.

Is there something specific the MSM should be doing? I genuinely do not understanding what your gripe is.

 

[Elixir]

One does not have to eat charred snails to understand they'd be awful.

Le sauce est tout!

 

[Patooka]

As I said earlier, most of the networks didn't broadcast Trump's speech so I don't know how you would perceive that as somehow accommodating him. I would say that is the opposite of accommodating him. Anything I have read about Trump's speech (not much granted) has said he's full of shit. As far as I can see, the MSM have never accommodated Trump on anything, quite the opposite.

Just so we are clear - this is going to be the MAGAtard response. "Didin't see it, don't know anyrhing about it. But ask me about and I'll be a whiny little bitch an play victim."

Not the first time. Won't be the last with weak apologists.

 

[ZiprHead]

So the biggest point that the election was rigged was that China was collecting poll data?

 

[Colonel Sanders]

Watching and hearing Trump speak on any issue is like eating charred snails.

I don't know about that, I have never eaten charred snails. I did have Escargots à la Bourguignonne years ago and thought it was ok but that's the one and only time I have eaten snails.

He's always been horrible, is horrible now, and will always be horrible. He'll tell provable lies, sputter nonsensical shit like a 2nd grader trying to describe astrophysics, and none of it will change any of his supporter's minds. Mainstream news will treat it seriously, while his propaganda outlets will treat it like the Gettysburg address. {snip}

I'm not sure who you are referring to here when you say MSM, but I assume you mean the big networks. Hardly any of the networks broadcast Trump's speech. Some of them may have made it available on their streaming platforms but I don't think any of the big networks actually broadcast it. And I don't know why you would say the MSM would take it seriously, I doubt that.

1. One does not have to eat charred snails to understand they'd be awful.

I looked up "charred snails". Seems quite a common dish and quite popular. I understand it may not be to everyone's taste but have you tried charred snails? Can't be any worse than Taco Bell I say.

2. The MSM, which use to attempt to be responsible and ethical has found itself trying to accommodate the most reprehensible POTUS in American history. Their very existence has been threatened by Trump. He's actually sued these spineless fucks yet some of them went blank when it came to endorsing a presidential candidate. They simply bowed the fuck out. The cunts refer to themselves as "The Fourth Estate" yet vacate the responsibilities the term implies by failing to sound the alarm bell if things might get hard for them.

As I said earlier, most of the networks didn't broadcast Trump's speech so I don't know how you would perceive that as somehow accommodating him. I would say that is the opposite of accommodating him. Anything I have read about Trump's speech (not much granted) has said he's full of shit. As far as I can see, the MSM have never accommodated Trump on anything, quite the opposite.

They've been cowed; threatened into complicity by an authoritarian pool of vomit. Fox News figured out how to reach people, yet the spineless pricks at formerly legitimate networks can't find their ass with both hands.

Is there something specific the MSM should be doing? I genuinely do not understanding what your gripe is.

The MSM, upon encountering a very real threat to our democracy should've changed up their traditional way of doing things. However, it's not my responsibility to inform them about what they should do and how to go about doing it. What you're saying is the equivalent of a fan being critical of their team and then someone responding with, "Could you do any better?"

It's just lame.

The MSM has been utterly inept in communicating to Americans just how much trouble we're in. The insufferable bastards who have always proclaimed themselves as guardians of democracy have failed in their self-appointed duty to inform and educate the people.

 

[crazyfingers]

So the biggest point that the election was rigged was that China was collecting poll data?

From non-secret sources and that's been known for years. Nothing new.

If Trunp was being honest he'd review how he and his alies tried to throw the election to him despite his clear loss in a fair election. But Trump isn't honest.

I do like how he released info demonstrating that Russia was trying to interfeer to cause him to win.

 

[ideologyhunter]

I didn't watch the Prez. Did he run the tape where he asks them to find him 11,780 votes?

 

[TSwizzle]

Watching and hearing Trump speak on any issue is like eating charred snails.

I don't know about that, I have never eaten charred snails. I did have Escargots à la Bourguignonne years ago and thought it was ok but that's the one and only time I have eaten snails.

He's always been horrible, is horrible now, and will always be horrible. He'll tell provable lies, sputter nonsensical shit like a 2nd grader trying to describe astrophysics, and none of it will change any of his supporter's minds. Mainstream news will treat it seriously, while his propaganda outlets will treat it like the Gettysburg address. {snip}

I'm not sure who you are referring to here when you say MSM, but I assume you mean the big networks. Hardly any of the networks broadcast Trump's speech. Some of them may have made it available on their streaming platforms but I don't think any of the big networks actually broadcast it. And I don't know why you would say the MSM would take it seriously, I doubt that.

1. One does not have to eat charred snails to understand they'd be awful.

I looked up "charred snails". Seems quite a common dish and quite popular. I understand it may not be to everyone's taste but have you tried charred snails? Can't be any worse than Taco Bell I say.

2. The MSM, which use to attempt to be responsible and ethical has found itself trying to accommodate the most reprehensible POTUS in American history. Their very existence has been threatened by Trump. He's actually sued these spineless fucks yet some of them went blank when it came to endorsing a presidential candidate. They simply bowed the fuck out. The cunts refer to themselves as "The Fourth Estate" yet vacate the responsibilities the term implies by failing to sound the alarm bell if things might get hard for them.

As I said earlier, most of the networks didn't broadcast Trump's speech so I don't know how you would perceive that as somehow accommodating him. I would say that is the opposite of accommodating him. Anything I have read about Trump's speech (not much granted) has said he's full of shit. As far as I can see, the MSM have never accommodated Trump on anything, quite the opposite.

They've been cowed; threatened into complicity by an authoritarian pool of vomit. Fox News figured out how to reach people, yet the spineless pricks at formerly legitimate networks can't find their ass with both hands.

Is there something specific the MSM should be doing? I genuinely do not understanding what your gripe is.

The MSM, upon encountering a very real threat to our democracy should've changed up their traditional way of doing things.

A couple of things. There is no threat to “our democracy” this is just nonsense on stilts. Which may explain why the MSM are not responding as how you would like. But you want them to change their way of doing things but change it to what? The MSM are so left leaning as it right now.

However, it's not my responsibility to inform them about what they should do and how to go about doing it. What you're saying is the equivalent of a fan being critical of their team and then someone responding with, "Could you do any better?"

It's just lame.

No clue what this is supposed to mean.

The MSM has been utterly inept in communicating to Americans just how much trouble we're in. The insufferable bastards who have always proclaimed themselves as guardians of democracy have failed in their self-appointed duty to inform and educate the people.

I’m not seeing it but then again, I don’t watch much news in the MSM. Hardly any actually.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

He is also reportedly going to discuss his wonderful tariffs, the war with Iran that we've already won 20 or 30 times, ....

You mean the excursion that we won 30 times. He is the best at winning excursions.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

So the biggest point that the election was rigged was that China was collecting poll data?

From non-secret sources and that's been known for years. Nothing new.

You are correct. When doing genealogy, I came across free sites like voterrecords.com and pay sites like truthfinder.com that have party affiliation for many people. These are the kinds of sources China was using, but Trump made it sound far more nefarious than the typical analysis that any country would do to predict US outcomes.

 

[southernhybrid]

I like how Senator Ossoff called Trump's speech, "the dementia speech". I'm also glad that he's raised far more money compared to. his idiot Trump supporter opponent.

 

[Colonel Sanders]

Watching and hearing Trump speak on any issue is like eating charred snails.

I don't know about that, I have never eaten charred snails. I did have Escargots à la Bourguignonne years ago and thought it was ok but that's the one and only time I have eaten snails.

He's always been horrible, is horrible now, and will always be horrible. He'll tell provable lies, sputter nonsensical shit like a 2nd grader trying to describe astrophysics, and none of it will change any of his supporter's minds. Mainstream news will treat it seriously, while his propaganda outlets will treat it like the Gettysburg address. {snip}

I'm not sure who you are referring to here when you say MSM, but I assume you mean the big networks. Hardly any of the networks broadcast Trump's speech. Some of them may have made it available on their streaming platforms but I don't think any of the big networks actually broadcast it. And I don't know why you would say the MSM would take it seriously, I doubt that.

1. One does not have to eat charred snails to understand they'd be awful.

I looked up "charred snails". Seems quite a common dish and quite popular. I understand it may not be to everyone's taste but have you tried charred snails? Can't be any worse than Taco Bell I say.

2. The MSM, which use to attempt to be responsible and ethical has found itself trying to accommodate the most reprehensible POTUS in American history. Their very existence has been threatened by Trump. He's actually sued these spineless fucks yet some of them went blank when it came to endorsing a presidential candidate. They simply bowed the fuck out. The cunts refer to themselves as "The Fourth Estate" yet vacate the responsibilities the term implies by failing to sound the alarm bell if things might get hard for them.

As I said earlier, most of the networks didn't broadcast Trump's speech so I don't know how you would perceive that as somehow accommodating him. I would say that is the opposite of accommodating him. Anything I have read about Trump's speech (not much granted) has said he's full of shit. As far as I can see, the MSM have never accommodated Trump on anything, quite the opposite.

They've been cowed; threatened into complicity by an authoritarian pool of vomit. Fox News figured out how to reach people, yet the spineless pricks at formerly legitimate networks can't find their ass with both hands.

Is there something specific the MSM should be doing? I genuinely do not understanding what your gripe is.

The MSM, upon encountering a very real threat to our democracy should've changed up their traditional way of doing things.

A couple of things. There is no threat to “our democracy” this is just nonsense on stilts. Which may explain why the MSM are not responding as how you would like. But you want them to change their way of doing things but change it to what? The MSM are so left leaning as it right now.

However, it's not my responsibility to inform them about what they should do and how to go about doing it. What you're saying is the equivalent of a fan being critical of their team and then someone responding with, "Could you do any better?"

It's just lame.

No clue what this is supposed to mean.

The MSM has been utterly inept in communicating to Americans just how much trouble we're in. The insufferable bastards who have always proclaimed themselves as guardians of democracy have failed in their self-appointed duty to inform and educate the people.

I’m not seeing it but then again, I don’t watch much news in the MSM. Hardly any actually.

You seem to have serious trouble with analogies. Just for you, I'll stop using one of the most effective point-making techniques in human communication.

You're welcome.

 

[GenesisNemesis]

Watching and hearing Trump speak on any issue is like eating charred snails.

I don't know about that, I have never eaten charred snails. I did have Escargots à la Bourguignonne years ago and thought it was ok but that's the one and only time I have eaten snails.

He's always been horrible, is horrible now, and will always be horrible. He'll tell provable lies, sputter nonsensical shit like a 2nd grader trying to describe astrophysics, and none of it will change any of his supporter's minds. Mainstream news will treat it seriously, while his propaganda outlets will treat it like the Gettysburg address. {snip}

I'm not sure who you are referring to here when you say MSM, but I assume you mean the big networks. Hardly any of the networks broadcast Trump's speech. Some of them may have made it available on their streaming platforms but I don't think any of the big networks actually broadcast it. And I don't know why you would say the MSM would take it seriously, I doubt that.

1. One does not have to eat charred snails to understand they'd be awful.

I looked up "charred snails". Seems quite a common dish and quite popular. I understand it may not be to everyone's taste but have you tried charred snails? Can't be any worse than Taco Bell I say.

2. The MSM, which use to attempt to be responsible and ethical has found itself trying to accommodate the most reprehensible POTUS in American history. Their very existence has been threatened by Trump. He's actually sued these spineless fucks yet some of them went blank when it came to endorsing a presidential candidate. They simply bowed the fuck out. The cunts refer to themselves as "The Fourth Estate" yet vacate the responsibilities the term implies by failing to sound the alarm bell if things might get hard for them.

As I said earlier, most of the networks didn't broadcast Trump's speech so I don't know how you would perceive that as somehow accommodating him. I would say that is the opposite of accommodating him. Anything I have read about Trump's speech (not much granted) has said he's full of shit. As far as I can see, the MSM have never accommodated Trump on anything, quite the opposite.

They've been cowed; threatened into complicity by an authoritarian pool of vomit. Fox News figured out how to reach people, yet the spineless pricks at formerly legitimate networks can't find their ass with both hands.

Is there something specific the MSM should be doing? I genuinely do not understanding what your gripe is.

The MSM, upon encountering a very real threat to our democracy should've changed up their traditional way of doing things.

A couple of things. There is no threat to “our democracy” this is just nonsense on stilts. Which may explain why the MSM are not responding as how you would like. But you want them to change their way of doing things but change it to what? The MSM are so left leaning as it right now.

However, it's not my responsibility to inform them about what they should do and how to go about doing it. What you're saying is the equivalent of a fan being critical of their team and then someone responding with, "Could you do any better?"

It's just lame.

No clue what this is supposed to mean.

The MSM has been utterly inept in communicating to Americans just how much trouble we're in. The insufferable bastards who have always proclaimed themselves as guardians of democracy have failed in their self-appointed duty to inform and educate the people.

I’m not seeing it but then again, I don’t watch much news in the MSM. Hardly any actually.

You seem to have serious trouble with analogies. Just for you, I'll stop using one of the most effective point-making techniques in human communication.

You're welcome.

I've found it's not effective when it comes to... certain kinds of people.

 

[TSwizzle]

Watching and hearing Trump speak on any issue is like eating charred snails.

I don't know about that, I have never eaten charred snails. I did have Escargots à la Bourguignonne years ago and thought it was ok but that's the one and only time I have eaten snails.

He's always been horrible, is horrible now, and will always be horrible. He'll tell provable lies, sputter nonsensical shit like a 2nd grader trying to describe astrophysics, and none of it will change any of his supporter's minds. Mainstream news will treat it seriously, while his propaganda outlets will treat it like the Gettysburg address. {snip}

I'm not sure who you are referring to here when you say MSM, but I assume you mean the big networks. Hardly any of the networks broadcast Trump's speech. Some of them may have made it available on their streaming platforms but I don't think any of the big networks actually broadcast it. And I don't know why you would say the MSM would take it seriously, I doubt that.

1. One does not have to eat charred snails to understand they'd be awful.

I looked up "charred snails". Seems quite a common dish and quite popular. I understand it may not be to everyone's taste but have you tried charred snails? Can't be any worse than Taco Bell I say.

2. The MSM, which use to attempt to be responsible and ethical has found itself trying to accommodate the most reprehensible POTUS in American history. Their very existence has been threatened by Trump. He's actually sued these spineless fucks yet some of them went blank when it came to endorsing a presidential candidate. They simply bowed the fuck out. The cunts refer to themselves as "The Fourth Estate" yet vacate the responsibilities the term implies by failing to sound the alarm bell if things might get hard for them.

As I said earlier, most of the networks didn't broadcast Trump's speech so I don't know how you would perceive that as somehow accommodating him. I would say that is the opposite of accommodating him. Anything I have read about Trump's speech (not much granted) has said he's full of shit. As far as I can see, the MSM have never accommodated Trump on anything, quite the opposite.

They've been cowed; threatened into complicity by an authoritarian pool of vomit. Fox News figured out how to reach people, yet the spineless pricks at formerly legitimate networks can't find their ass with both hands.

Is there something specific the MSM should be doing? I genuinely do not understanding what your gripe is.

The MSM, upon encountering a very real threat to our democracy should've changed up their traditional way of doing things.

A couple of things. There is no threat to “our democracy” this is just nonsense on stilts. Which may explain why the MSM are not responding as how you would like. But you want them to change their way of doing things but change it to what? The MSM are so left leaning as it right now.

However, it's not my responsibility to inform them about what they should do and how to go about doing it. What you're saying is the equivalent of a fan being critical of their team and then someone responding with, "Could you do any better?"

It's just lame.

No clue what this is supposed to mean.

The MSM has been utterly inept in communicating to Americans just how much trouble we're in. The insufferable bastards who have always proclaimed themselves as guardians of democracy have failed in their self-appointed duty to inform and educate the people.

I’m not seeing it but then again, I don’t watch much news in the MSM. Hardly any actually.

You seem to have serious trouble with analogies. Just for you, I'll stop using one of the most effective point-making techniques in human communication.

You're welcome.

You seem to have serious trouble stating what you are seeing, providing evidence for it and what it is you want done about it.

 

[BH]

Trump appeals to pychopaths, sadists, narcissistics, and there is no winning them over or reasoning with them. The country is at a point where it is run by antisocials and it has to run its course and let people learn the hard way.

 

[southernhybrid]

Trump appeals to pychopaths, sadists, narcissistics, and there is no winning them over or reasoning with them. The country is at a point where it is run by antisocials and it has to run its course and let people learn the hard way.

He also appeals to the poorly educated. I know a few who are very sweet people, but are still member of his cult. They are older adults who have no idea that they voted against their own self interests, but they do get their disinformation from NewsMax, which I refer to as Fox on steroids.

 

[southernhybrid]

Did someone claim that Trump isn't a threat to democracy? Well, since The Hill has been fact checked to be one of the most unbiased sources of news, let's see what it says.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/5970745-trump-threat-election-integrity/

This is an opinion piece but I think most of the reporters would agree. It was written shortly before his dementia speech.

Trump threatens survival of American democracy with election rigging efforts​

Comments:18

The president wants to prevent Democrats from gaining majority control of one or both congressional chambers in the midterm elections to stop them from blocking his favored legislation and investigating him and his administration. He has said a Democratic House majority would impeach him.

Showing his disrespect for elections, Trump continues to claim, falsely, that he won the 2020 presidential race that Joe Biden actually won. This lie could have deadly consequences.

Trump has irresponsibly endangered the lives of Americans and our national security by giving hundreds of FBI employees and members of the intelligence community the impossible mission of proving he was reelected in 2020. While they are wasting time on this, they are not working to protect us against possible terrorist attacks from Iran and America’s other enemies.

There is more and it's free to read.

 

[TSwizzle]

Did someone claim that Trump isn't a threat to democracy? Well, since The Hill has been fact checked to be one of the most unbiased sources of news, let's see what it says.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/5970745-trump-threat-election-integrity/

This is an opinion piece but I think most of the reporters would agree. It was written shortly before his dementia speech.

Trump threatens survival of American democracy with election rigging efforts​

Comments:18

The president wants to prevent Democrats from gaining majority control of one or both congressional chambers in the midterm elections to stop them from blocking his favored legislation and investigating him and his administration. He has said a Democratic House majority would impeach him.

Showing his disrespect for elections, Trump continues to claim, falsely, that he won the 2020 presidential race that Joe Biden actually won. This lie could have deadly consequences.

Trump has irresponsibly endangered the lives of Americans and our national security by giving hundreds of FBI employees and members of the intelligence community the impossible mission of proving he was reelected in 2020. While they are wasting time on this, they are not working to protect us against possible terrorist attacks from Iran and America’s other enemies.

There is more and it's free to read.

Free garbage.

Is The Hill considered part of MSM, if so, how are they complicit with Trump?