marc
Veteran Member
Sounds like how Christians are being oppressed by not being allowed to force their beliefs on everyone else.
She should be there because she is interested in the guy, not because he is paying for her lobster.
What do you think of women like these: Toronto Woman Serial Dates to Get Free Restaurant Meals and Blogs About It
She seems to have the same attitude like you
I.e. she believes her very presence is enough to justify the "price of admission".Erin Wotherspoon said:"guys should feel honoured by this open invitation to date me."
P1: "Student banned for free thought"
P2: "Um, no he was disrupting the class and asked to stop"
.
"True upset students when he said that it was understandable that the Holocaust happened given that people are not often taught to question systems of oppression, and other , and made other comments about race and class."
"Rape culture is indisputable and [True’s] words and actions are deeply upsetting."
Yes, exactly. There seems to be no particular reason for a professor teaching the art and humanities of classical Greece to disrupt the class by citing bogus campus rape statistics.
I see you attended the course. Because you claim to know exactly what was said and who brought up the subject in the first place.
I see you attended the course. Because you claim to know exactly what was said and who brought up the subject in the first place.
I take no position on what happened in that classroom.
But I don't have to know what happened in that classroom to know it's possible to teach about the arts and humanities of classical Greece without citing bogus campus rape statistics.
I take no position on what happened in that classroom.
But I don't have to know what happened in that classroom to know it's possible to teach about the arts and humanities of classical Greece without citing bogus campus rape statistics.
So he taught that and a student didn't bring it up as a side discussion? I look forward to seeing you back up your assertion.
So he taught that and a student didn't bring it up as a side discussion? I look forward to seeing you back up your assertion.
I didn't notice that I had made any assertion other than it's possible to teach the arts and humanities of classical Greece without citing bogus campus rape statistics.
Do you disagree with this assertion, which I actually did make?
I didn't notice that I had made any assertion other than it's possible to teach the arts and humanities of classical Greece without citing bogus campus rape statistics.
Do you disagree with this assertion, which I actually did make?
Well, it was likely assumed that your post had a modicum of relevance to the topic of the thread you were posting in.
I see you attended the course. Because you claim to know exactly what was said and who brought up the subject in the first place.
I take no position on what happened in that classroom.
But I don't have to know what happened in that classroom to know it's possible to teach about the arts and humanities of classical Greece without citing bogus campus rape statistics.
I take no position on what happened in that classroom.
ok
But I don't have to know what happened in that classroom to know it's possible to teach about the arts and humanities of classical Greece without citing bogus campus rape statistics.
wait, that's a position
I take no position on what happened in that classroom.
ok
But I don't have to know what happened in that classroom to know it's possible to teach about the arts and humanities of classical Greece without citing bogus campus rape statistics.
wait, that's a position
If you give an opinion, that is speech.
If you give the same opinion over and over to a trapped audience, to the point it disrupts the speech of others, that is conduct.
If only it was an isolated incident. But unfortunately US universities have become the refuge of left-wing radicals.
I'm actually for legal prostitution, I just think guys that can't get laid without paying for it are pathetic.
If only it was an isolated incident. But unfortunately US universities have become the refuge of left-wing radicals.
You weren't alive during the '60's, were you?
Well good for you if you keep getting dates.Hmmm, how do I put this? I don't know you, but there seems to be an attitude you are giving off. I do not see dating as a game and have plenty of dates.
Where do you even meet so many women that you can find three to date? Especially since women who would accept a date that costs $5 on average are very rare.Because I have plenty of dates, I am confident and am happy to spend time with a beautiful woman just for the sake of enjoying each other's company. The last three dates I was on cost a total of $15. (Free concert, hike on the prairie, and ice cream. - Nothing that even comes close to breaking the bank.) Of those three, I liked two of them.
No wonder if the food cost $2.50 per person.(The other was a model who was obsessively complaining about food.)
"Silly" might be a better descriptor than "cute". I hope for her sake that she at least wore some sensible shoes and no heels ...Now that being said a woman definitely puts up stakes. It's so cute when they get all gussied up with push-up bras and make up to go for a hike.
Well if dating works for you, fine, but it certainly never worked for me. And it's difficult to enjoy dating if one is being taken advantage of.They are also trying to impress the man who they are meeting. I'm just baffled at the negative attitude toward women I hear posted in this thread and it is why I recommend dropping it and adopting more of a breezy, "I am enjoying life" attitude. It makes for a better dating experience over, "crap, I have to pay an extra $25 for a woman who won't put out tonight".
Women can get free food and entertainment out of dating. I would say that definitely benefits women much more so than men. It only benefits men if it leads to something, but then we are again at "paying for it".Ahh, but they benefit the man too. The reason why women respond positively to gentlemen is the reason we all respond positively to gentlemen. They are displaying their intent and thoughtfulness. You can be a lazy brute, but gentlemen take the time to show they care and are committed to others. This works in all aspects of your life.
It is objectively speaking paying for sex if the woman sleeps with him and would not have given him the time of day if he didn't pay for her drink and/or dinner.I suspect that men who view buying a woman drinks or paying for the date as a "form of... paying for sex" are the ones not getting laid.
Clearly unlike straight-up prostitution buying a woman a drink or paying for the date is no guarantee of anything. A man may even become victim of one of the mercenary women I posted above who go on dates for the sole purpose of eating free food. But still, if the act of paying for drinks/food successfully leads to sex how is it not "paying for sex"?Not referring to Derec in any way whatsoever, but believing that buying a woman a drink or paying on a date means the guy has also bought himself some sex is an attitude that leads to date rapes.
What century do you live in