thebeave
Contributor
Was it a shock when Liberace came out as gay? Not to me, but apparently some people were flabbergasted.
AI Overview
LGBTQ+ is an acronym that stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning. The plus sign represents additional sexual orientations and gender identities, such as intersex and asexual. It is an umbrella term used to describe people with diverse sexual orientations and gender identities.
DrZ
In the OP tittle when it comes to speech by gay do you mean both gay men and lesbian women, or just gay men?
A derogatory for men is effeminate, for women dikes. Dike referring in part to masculine speech by women.
Over here gay can refer to both or specifically men.
Over here the current liberal politically correct inclusive term is LGBTQ+. Using the acronym in speech can be awkward, it doesn't flow. Easier to jjust say gay.
AI Overview
LGBTQ+ is an acronym that stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning. The plus sign represents additional sexual orientations and gender identities, such as intersex and asexual. It is an umbrella term used to describe people with diverse sexual orientations and gender identities.
OMG! Conflict, power struggles, bias, and prejudice in the gay community. Who would have ever thunk it. Goes to show gays are as human as the rest of us.
When I was growingup, 50s 60s, as an insult a hetero would call a hetero gay, queer, faggot. or effeminate. Nothing to do with misogyny.
If one guy wanted to provoke or pick a fight with a guy one way was to call him queer or a fag. Today hate speech laws and a cultural shift towards gay rights have diminished it.
Back in the 80s when I was in Portland a gay sports club made the news when it would not admit bisexuals.
Are you saying Muslims are gay?Muslims in general are about as gay friendly as Adolf Hitler.
AI Overview
Yes, homosexuality functions largely as an open secret in major Saudi cities, where underground social and digital networks exist, but it remains heavily suppressed. While consensual same-sex acts are strictly illegal under traditional interpretations of Sharia law—with potential punishments including imprisonment, flogging, or death—enforcement can be arbitrary or discreet.
In the 80s I knew an engineer who spent time working in Pakistan and the Arab oil states. He said homosexuality was an open secret.
He also said some of it had to do with strict separation of unmarried men and women.
AI Overview
Yes, homosexuality functions largely as an open secret in major Saudi cities, where underground social and digital networks exist, but it remains heavily suppressed. While consensual same-sex acts are strictly illegal under traditional interpretations of Sharia law—with potential punishments including imprisonment, flogging, or death—enforcement can be arbitrary or discreet.
To me Christians, Jews, and Muslims are the same. They all range from liberal, to moderate. to conservative. to wacky extremes. In all three groups views on homosexuality depends on the individual.
Jewish Israel led the USA on gay rights.
It is looking more and more like DrZ is deeply opinionated and biased. Prejudiced and maybe racist. ..
Why are you focusing on Muslims?
Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists as well can all be extremity conservative when it comes to sexuality.
This is pretty much a liberal secular pro gay forum, but I expect there are anti gay atheists out there.
From what I read going back to old civilizations prohibitions on homosexuality varied.
I am not gay, but I witnessed the rise of gay rights and 'coming out of the closet'. American Christianity has been rapid anti gay. Some of our Christian politicians have gone to Africa to support extreme anti homosexual regiems.s
It may be Uganda where a parent can get into trouble for not reporting a gay kid.
Butt hen there are liberal Christians and congregations who have gay minsters. Perform gay marria
So, it comes down to the individuals.
Bumper stickers featuring hateful slogans like "God hates [slur]" are most famously associated with the Westboro Baptist Church, an extremist group known for anti-LGBTQ+ protests. These messages are widely condemned as hate speech. In response, counter-stickers and inclusive messages such as "God loves everyone" are common on Etsy.
European serfdom was neither standard chattel slavery nor "chattel serfdom." Instead, it was a unique feudal system where peasants were legally bound to a specific plot of land and the lord who owned it, rather than being treated as moveable personal property (chattel) that could be bought and sold independently.
DrZ
More of your opinionated drivel and nonsense? I don't consider myself all that well read compared to others, but you are just pain ignorant.
You are not answering my points. You single out being gay in a Muslim family, I point out that most religions range from liberal to moderate to conservative to extreme.
Until support for gay rights over here being gay in a Christian family could be very difficult. Coming out as gay in the day could cause you severe social problems and end a job career. It could get you physically beaten by those loving Christians. I remember a bumper sticker 'god hates fags'.
You will get nowhere with me arguing any kind of superiority of Christianity. While European Chriastains was dumping slop in the streets Arabs had clean cities and hospitals.
Throughout history science and math has always followed the money. Before the rise of Europe Persia and Arabia was the place to be for sconce. As they declined it passed to Christian Europe. Newton used Persian astronomical data and the general principles of his mechanics existed in pint in Arabia.
As to agrarian and Christian aka Catholic, Europe it was based in feudalism. European Christianity for the masses was keeping the peasants ignorant and in line through fear.
That is usually the only kind of evidence this forum is inclined to acknowledge... gurl?Well gosh... you didn't say you had anecdotal evidence. That clinches it!
Pitting two despised minorities against each other does not make people safer in the long term. Rather, it sets up what we call a "Red Stick War" in the US-- reference being to a historical conflict where the US Government cheerfully egged on both sides of a civil war within the Creek/Muskogee nations, then when it it was over, took all of their land for themselves, framing their own theft as just punishment for the losers and just payment for their help to the winners. LGBTQ people are well-advised to befriend other peoples on the far-right dart board even if there severe ideological divides between them. At the end of the day, increased contact and a sense of common cause are wearing down those barriers, whereas falling for right-wing rhetoric and letting themselves be turned into weapons of state guarantees nothing but continued dispossession. You are not very aware of the real situation of either of the groups in question, if you think that either is culturally homogenous. Not even in Sweden do all gays sound the same, or all Muslims believe the same things about the implications of Tawheed.The only big threat to gays in Sweden are Muslims. That's not opinion. That's a fact. And playing that down is dangerous to do. Because it hurts gays. I personally think we should protect minorities. Sometimes we need to protect them from other minorities. Denmark and Norway has less problems, because they've had more restrictive immigration
A big sign is someone that uses woke in a derogatory way.It is looking more and more like DrZ is deeply opinionated and biased. Prejudiced and maybe racist. ..
Pitting two despised minorities against each other does not make people safer in the long term. Rather, it sets up what we call a "Red Stick War" in the US-- reference being to a historical conflict where the US Government cheerfully egged on both sides of a civil war within the Creek/Muskogee nations, then when it it was over, took all of their land for themselves, framing their own theft as just punishment for the losers and just payment for their help to the winners. LGBTQ people are well-advised to befriend other peoples on the far-right dart board even if there severe ideological divides between them. At the end of the day, increased contact and a sense of common cause are wearing down those barriers, whereas falling for right-wing rhetoric and letting themselves be turned into weapons of state guarantees nothing but continued dispossession. You are not very aware of the real situation of either of the groups in question, if you think that either is culturally homogenous.
Not even in Sweden do all gays sound the same,
or all Muslims believe the same things about the implications of Tawheed.