• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Noah’s Ark Found!!

Not enough water you say when a large 71% of the earth is already covered?. How much more water makes it unfathomable to you for the rest of the earth to be covered? That's pretty much a world flood ...almost.

Where did the extra water come from to cover the whole earth up the mountain tops?

You really believe this stuff, don’t you? You really believe that Noah and his ark were real?

So pathetic.
 

Probably everyone around him, assuming he existed, regarded him as such a stupid prick that it just felt like he had been around for 600 years or whatever.
I think it was more like he was the kind of alky who looks way older than he is. Kids probably saw him sitting in front of his house, slurring his prayers, puking, and knocking back hits of hooch.
First Kid: Jesus, look at that guy. How old is he?
Second Kid: Fuck knows. Looks like he's 600!!

Well, to be fair, Noah lived, allegedly, long before Jesus.

The kid might have said something like, “Zeus, look at that guy! How old is he?”
But you do think in ancient Palestine the kids were saying, "Fuck knows"?
 

Probably everyone around him, assuming he existed, regarded him as such a stupid prick that it just felt like he had been around for 600 years or whatever.
I think it was more like he was the kind of alky who looks way older than he is. Kids probably saw him sitting in front of his house, slurring his prayers, puking, and knocking back hits of hooch.
First Kid: Jesus, look at that guy. How old is he?
Second Kid: Fuck knows. Looks like he's 600!!

Well, to be fair, Noah lived, allegedly, long before Jesus.

The kid might have said something like, “Zeus, look at that guy! How old is he?”
But you do think in ancient Palestine the kids were saying, "Fuck knows"?

Well, in those days and that in region, “plough my vulva” was oft used for “fuck,” and of course cuz it’s from AI this could be crap, but if true the kid would say, “Plough my vulva knows !” :D
 
  • Roll Eyes
Reactions: WAB
God then said he will reduce the age of man to down to 120 years in Genesis 6:3

Anyway since AI is the thing and quite useful. What are people in the modern world suggesting?

There is no consensus on a fixed maximum human lifespan, with estimates ranging from 115 to 150 years based on current biological limits, while theoretical models suggest ages up to 1,000 years if aging is medically cured.
🙄

The verified oldest person in history was Jeanne Calment, who lived to 122 years and 164 days. Current scientific debate centers on whether this represents a hard biological cap or simply a statistical plateau due to limited supercentenarian data.

Biological Limit Estimates: Recent studies using computer models and resilience metrics suggest a natural hard limit between 120 and 150 years, as the body loses the ability to recover from physiological stressors.


Demographic Predictions: Statistical models from the University of Washington estimate a 99% probability that someone will reach 124 years and a 13% probability of reaching 130 years by 2100.


Contrasting Views: Some researchers argue there is no fixed upper limit, citing late-life mortality plateaus in data, while others maintain a cap around 115–125 years due to intrinsic bodily decay.



I think this is the one shown below for pood to poo poo.

Theoretical Potential: Geneticists propose that if cellular aging were "cured," average human lifespan could exceed 1,000 years, with maximum lifespans potentially reaching 20,000 years.

Didn't God of the bible reduce the life span of humans to 120 years? 😏

Calm down,please note: the above is not my argument.. but however...non of the above is from the religious perspective of the bible.
 
Last edited:
God then said he will reduce the age of man to down to 120 years in Genesis 6:3

Anyway since AI is the thing and quite useful. What are people in the modern world suggesting?

There is no consensus on a fixed maximum human lifespan, with estimates ranging from 115 to 150 years based on current biological limits, while theoretical models suggest ages up to 1,000 years if aging is medically cured.
🙄

The verified oldest person in history was Jeanne Calment, who lived to 122 years and 164 days. Current scientific debate centers on whether this represents a hard biological cap or simply a statistical plateau due to limited supercentenarian data.

Biological Limit Estimates: Recent studies using computer models and resilience metrics suggest a natural hard limit between 120 and 150 years, as the body loses the ability to recover from physiological stressors.


Demographic Predictions: Statistical models from the University of Washington estimate a 99% probability that someone will reach 124 years and a 13% probability of reaching 130 years by 2100.


Contrasting Views: Some researchers argue there is no fixed upper limit, citing late-life mortality plateaus in data, while others maintain a cap around 115–125 years due to intrinsic bodily decay.



I think this is the one shown below for pood to poo poo.

Theoretical Potential: Geneticists propose that if cellular aging were "cured," average human lifespan could exceed 1,000 years, with maximum lifespans potentially reaching 20,000 years.

Didn't God of the bible reduce the life span of humans? Calm down, please note: the above is not my argument.. however... non of the above is from the religious perspective of the bible.

And what does any of this have to do with your mythical Noah and his myhthical flood?
 
BTW, which geneticists propose the things you claim above? Do you have a cite?

And were such geneticists around in antiquity to make sure that Noah lived to 600 years? :unsure:
 
Not enough water you say when a large 71% of the earth is already covered?. How much more water makes it unfathomable to you for the rest of the earth to be covered? That's pretty much a world flood ...almost.

Where did the extra water come from to cover the whole earth up the mountain tops?

You really believe this stuff, don’t you? You really believe that Noah and his ark were real?

So pathetic.
Love the logic...

....did it also occur to you, or not occur to you where the present remaining volume of water which is the much larger part that exists today also comes from?
Think about it.
 
Not enough water you say when a large 71% of the earth is already covered?. How much more water makes it unfathomable to you for the rest of the earth to be covered? That's pretty much a world flood ...almost.

Where did the extra water come from to cover the whole earth up the mountain tops?

You really believe this stuff, don’t you? You really believe that Noah and his ark were real?

So pathetic.
And just stating that the Earth is 71% covered... doesn't explain where the water came from. 🤨
 
Not enough water you say when a large 71% of the earth is already covered?. How much more water makes it unfathomable to you for the rest of the earth to be covered? That's pretty much a world flood ...almost.
Yes. All the water there is is enough to cover 71% of the landmass. And since any additional water has to cover the existing seas, too, we are talking about really huge amounts of water. About three times as much as there is now. So, the bucket is one-quarter full now, and you say it overflowed. That water had to come from somewhere and go somewhere.
Simple common sense from spatial relationships between the large earth mass and all the oceans. Water covering the earth is but a thin film layer compared to the gargantuan size of the earths mass. By the simple deduction ...not really a lot more water would be needed to cover the whole earth when these are compared....a very easy to understand mode of awareness.
Simple deduction, adding three times the current earth oceans worth of water is quite a lot - three times as much as there is now. You seem to imply that there is a huge reservoir of water inside the earth that come and went without leaving any trace. There is not, geologists would know about it if there was.
You could have chosen to use "multivariable differential calculus" instead of "spatial reasoning" and your post would have made just as much sense.
It would make more sense if certain individuals can stop thinking of biblical miracles. But they need it to debate with.lol the irony
As far as I see it is you who has to keep posting vague claims. Actually, you are claiming that it was not a miracle. You could answer the question about the water - or the size and stability of the ark or Noah great age - just by saying they are all miracles. But you do not. You keep trying to wave your hands to explain how these things are mundanely possible.
 
Love the logic...

....did it also occur to you, or not occur to you where the present remaining volume of water which is the much larger part that exists today also comes from?
Think about it.
No, the process cannot be anything even close the similar. Remember, you are claiming that three earth ocean's worth of water was added in a matter of days.
 
Not enough water you say when a large 71% of the earth is already covered?. How much more water makes it unfathomable to you for the rest of the earth to be covered? That's pretty much a world flood ...almost.

Where did the extra water come from to cover the whole earth up the mountain tops?

You really believe this stuff, don’t you? You really believe that Noah and his ark were real?

So pathetic.
And just stating that the Earth is 71% covered... doesn't explain where the water came from. 🤨
Of course it doesn't. I wasn't making this claim.

The bible says from within the earth and from the heavens. I think it's literally meaning that. .Now of course its not something I can demonstrate, in exactly what way its describing....
...multitudes of floating ice like colossal hail-stones from space melting at the precise moment into large volumes of water pouring onto the earth? I jest.. It won't matter how I'd explain it ,if at all. It won't matter if the flood still happened.
 
Calm down,please note: the above is not my argument..
Indeed, it is not even something you understand.

You just got a feeling that it probably doesn't disagree with the utter nonsense you fervently believe, so you spewed it up in leiu of actually saying anything.
 
Love the logic...

....did it also occur to you, or not occur to you where the present remaining volume of water which is the much larger part that exists today also comes from?
Think about it.
No, the process cannot be anything even close the similar. Remember, you are claiming that three earth ocean's worth of water was added in a matter of days.
Water added? A trivial amount in relation to the much larger part? The oceans were much much lower. There are many built structures worldwide undersea across the world. A lot more water would be added than your much smaller amount anyway. Now if you didn't get the "spatial" perspective(.that word again) that the earth is many times the volume mass of the oceans. In answer to the the missing volume of water that would be the total of the global flood.. .
..the earth by it's gargantuan size in comparison should easily absorb /drink that small missing volume of water.
 
Last edited:
No, the process cannot be anything even close the similar. Remember, you are claiming that three earth ocean's worth of water was added in a matter of days.
Water added? A trivial amount in relation to the much larger part? The oceans were much much lower. There are many built structures worldwide undersea across the world. A lot more water would be added than your much smaller amount anyway.

Three times the current each oceans is not trivial. And it cannot appear and disappear without leaving any trace.
Now if you didn't get the "spatial" perspective(.that word again) that the earth is many times the volume mass of the oceans. In answer to the the missing volume of water that would have total the global flood.. .the by the gargantuan size comparison should be able to absorb / drink that missing volume of water.
The fact that the globe on your desk is hollow does not mean the planet is.
 
Calm down,please note: the above is not my argument..
Indeed, it is not even something you understand.

You just got a feeling that it probably doesn't disagree with the utter nonsense you fervently believe, so you spewed it up in leiu of actually saying anything.
Enters one of the intellectuals I mentioned earlier.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: WAB
Love the logic...

....did it also occur to you, or not occur to you where the present remaining volume of water which is the much larger part that exists today also comes from?
Think about it.
No, the process cannot be anything even close the similar. Remember, you are claiming that three earth ocean's worth of water was added in a matter of days.
Water added? A trivial amount in relation to the much larger part? The oceans were much much lower. There are many built structures worldwide undersea across the world. A lot more water would be added than your much smaller amount anyway. Now if you didn't get the "spatial" perspective(.that word again) that the earth is many times the volume mass of the oceans. In answer to the the missing volume of water that would be the total of the global flood.. .
..the earth by it's gargantuan size in comparison should easily absorb /drink that small missing volume of water.

Speaking of AI being useful, I put this nonsensical text into AI. Here is what it drew:
1791397058392.png
 
Not enough water you say when a large 71% of the earth is already covered?. How much more water makes it unfathomable to you for the rest of the earth to be covered? That's pretty much a world flood ...almost.

Where did the extra water come from to cover the whole earth up the mountain tops?

You really believe this stuff, don’t you? You really believe that Noah and his ark were real?

So pathetic.
Love the logic...

....did it also occur to you, or not occur to you where the present remaining volume of water which is the much larger part that exists today also comes from?
Think about it.

Think about what? What are you even struggling to say?
 
Back
Top Bottom