• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Climate Change(d)?

Is Tswizzle under the antiscience impression that science isn't supposed to "suggest" things?
TSwizzle's posts indicate that we can't demonstrate that any of the change, when he allows that there is any change at all, is:
  • caused by human activity
  • large enough to care
  • indicates any particular hardships down the road are fictional
Of course,
  • the change was predicted in 70s based on the influence of CO2 in the atmosphere from human activities
  • the temp increase is pretty close to that predicted in the 70s up to this point
  • the predictions in the 70s indicated that major problems wouldn't be seen for several more decades past the 2020s

Climate change from CO2 was first predicted in 19th century. President Johnson talked about it in the 1960s.
 
Some people don't want to know the truth so they deny the truth regardless of how much evidence is presented to them. We obviously have one of them here and I fail to see, other than getting some attention, why that person continues to bother to stay in this thread.

I ask the same question of you. Why do you trawl the internet to find climate apocalypse porn articles and fervently post here? What is the purpose other than to seek my attention?
 
The new religion, it appears that some folk tend to favour political ideology over science.

Climate catastrophe is all about politics.
Climate denial is all about money.

lol, nobody denies climate silly goose!!
You do. You deny how the climate works, because it is subject to human influence whether you like it or not. Therefore, it is climate denial.

And yet you can never bring any meaningful, empirical proof of this human influence.
 
The new religion, it appears that some folk tend to favour political ideology over science.

Climate catastrophe is all about politics.
Climate denial is all about money.

lol, nobody denies climate silly goose!!
You do. You deny how the climate works, because it is subject to human influence whether you like it or not. Therefore, it is climate denial.

And yet you can never bring any meaningful, empirical proof of this human influence.
And just like the Creationists, no amount of data will ever be good enough for you.
 
Wow, TSwizzle leaned a new word, empirical.



Yes TSwizzle we posted beaucoup examples and how science explains it, Y0ur rense is to inore it.

No point in repeating what has repeated several times.

Here is some new words for you. Thermodynamics, heat transfer, infrared radiation.
 
While Swiz aggressively flaunts his abysmal ignorance, reality plods along without regard to his personal comfort. Science keeps getting it right, Trump and the idiots who elected him keep getting things wrong. But their donors know which side their bread is buttered on.🤷‍♂️
 
The TSwizenator still has not offered any refutation of the science behind global warming.
 
The TSwizenator still has not offered any refutation of the science behind global warming.

The burden of proof is on you lot. You have failed miserably.
I and others have explained it over and over. You are either unable or unwilling to follow it. or a combination of te two.

To make your case you have to refute thermodynamics, the most foundational part of science. Anyone in any hard science or engineering learns it.



Thermodynamics is a branch of physics that deals with heat, work, and temperature, and their relation to energy, entropy, and the physical properties of matter and radiation. The behavior of these quantities is governed by the four laws of thermodynamics, which convey a quantitative description using measurable macroscopic physical quantities but may be explained in terms of microscopic constituents by statistical mechanics. Thermodynamics applies to various topics in science and engineering, especially physical chemistry, biochemistry, chemical engineering, and mechanical engineering, as well as other complex fields such as meteorology.

Climate is a thermodynamic system. Storms fuled by ocean temperatures are called thermodynamic engines.


To put it simply again.

Greenhouse gazes are essential to life on Earth. Without greenhouse gases the Earth would be cold and frozen. Solar radiation heats the Earth and it is reradiated back into space, inferred thermal radiation.

Mars is cold because it has no greenhouse gases.

On a sunny day in the winter a large rock in the sun heats up. After the sun goes down you feel heat radiating from the rock. It radiates back into space. Greenhouse gases trap some of the heat.

Greenhouse gases act like a blanket that traps heat warming the surface.

Add to much gases and surface temperature goes up. Conservation of energy from thermodynamics.

It is as simple as that.

And again if not human caused, what is the 'natural; cause of ocean warming?
 
Back
Top Bottom