• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Progressives betray voters and back a Zionist speaker

Who are these weird theoretical people who criticize Israeli colonizing, but think the Sykes-Picot based states and their gradual Arabization were a feckin great idea? I don't think many people see the creation of "Arab states" as any more a positive historical development than the creation of Israel. I do oppose slaughtering people because of an animosity I think they "most likely have", though. No. Guessing that someone might feel something is not a valid justification for murder. Living in a particular country is not a crime none of us are offered a choice on where to be born.

To reiterate: if someone thinks that there should be no Jewish state, but that there should be e.g. Arab states, how do you explain that except that they most likely have an animosity toward Jewish people?
 

I think that the left's needs to be careful of its attacks on evil AIPAC donations. It deeply smells of bias. I get that people are pissed at Israel. But no other lobby group gets nearly this amount of attention. Why? The source of AIPAC money is 100% Americans. There is no Israeli money in the PAC. It's not directed by Israel. Often times, AIPIC is at odds against Netanau and the settler movement. AIPAC is fully transparent and follows all US disclosure laws. There are tons of bad US PACs. There are PACs for former slave owners, a PAC for Elon Musk (fuck Musk), and etc. There is even a right wing "republican Jewish PAC". But I find the attacks on AIPAC to be creepy and dangerous.
 
Back
Top Bottom