Progressives betray voters and back a Zionist speaker

[Toni]

I agree that Jeffries should be Speaker.

Did he ever provide a plausible explanation with regards to his private meeting with Kushner? That in and of itself screams to me ,"I hope you like the current status quo because I'll be pushing an agenda of doing jack fucking shit".

I think his position requires that he sit down with people he disagrees with quite sharply.

Agreed. I'd add openly and transparently as well. It was pretty clear he never wanted to discuss the meeting and if the NYT had never reported it, he would never had discussed it.

It is sad but true that sometimes things—important things re: national security-/especially national security need to be discussed in private.

 

[Patooka]

I agree that Jeffries should be Speaker.

Did he ever provide a plausible explanation with regards to his private meeting with Kushner? That in and of itself screams to me ,"I hope you like the current status quo because I'll be pushing an agenda of doing jack fucking shit".

I think his position requires that he sit down with people he disagrees with quite sharply.

Agreed. I'd add openly and transparently as well. It was pretty clear he never wanted to discuss the meeting and if the NYT had never reported it, he would never had discussed it.

It is sad but true that sometimes things—important things re: national security-/especially national security need to be discussed in private.

I'm not saying you're wrong - I'm saying in this case that scenario is highly unlikely. And if I had to correspond with anyone even remotely affiliated with this Administration, I would absolutely ensure there was a paper trail to cover my own backside.