• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

WSJ Croudsources Hillary's Emails.

Well, you need to take that in context. 53,000 of those are her talking about hairdos and the latest style in pants suits. She's actually rally vain and shallow. Then a couple thousand talking about Secretary of State stuff and only four plotting the downfall of civilization at Benghazi - it's a fairly simple and straightforward plan without much needless complexity.
 
Well, you need to take that in context. 53,000 of those are her talking about hairdos and the latest style in pants suits. She's actually rally vain and shallow. Then a couple thousand talking about Secretary of State stuff and only four plotting the downfall of civilization at Benghazi - it's a fairly simple and straightforward plan without much needless complexity.

And how many are simply notifications of no importance?

I get multiple emails a day from www.gameknot.com--probably over 1000/year.
 
Well, you need to take that in context. 53,000 of those are her talking about hairdos and the latest style in pants suits. She's actually rally vain and shallow. Then a couple thousand talking about Secretary of State stuff and only four plotting the downfall of civilization at Benghazi - it's a fairly simple and straightforward plan without much needless complexity.

And how many are simply notifications of no importance?

I get multiple emails a day from www.gameknot.com--probably over 1000/year.

Yeah, I didn't think of incoming and cc, etc. What I'd like to know is what software she was running on her "home based email server"? Her address was supposedly 'hdr22@clintonemail.com'. Let's do a quick search:

There is at least a live webserver...

:~ dan$ whois: clintonemail.com

.....
Registrant Name: PERFECT PRIVACY, LLC
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: 12808 Gran Bay Parkway West
Registrant City: Jacksonville
Registrant State/Province: FL
Registrant Postal Code: 32258
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.5707088780
Registrant Phone Ext:

Wonder who is doing the DNS...

dan$ dig clintonemail.com
; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> clintonemail.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 46718
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;clintonemail.com. IN A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
clintonemail.com. 6862 IN A 208.91.197.27


dan$ whois 208.91.197.27

Confluence Networks Inc CONFLUENCE-NETWORK-INC (NET-208-91-196-0-1) 208.91.196.0 - 208.91.199.255

Google leads to http://confluence-networks.com/

dan$ whois confluence-networks.com

...

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/epp-status-codes-2014-06-16-en.
Domain Name: CONFLUENCE-NETWORKS.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1649478868_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.publicdomainregistry.com
Registrar URL: www.publicdomainregistry.com
Updated Date: 2012-03-12T15:22:22Z
Creation Date: 2011-04-06T10:57:09Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2017-04-06T10:57:09Z
Registrar: PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
Registrar IANA ID: 303
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Domain Admin
Registrant Organization: Privacy Protection Service INC d/b/a PrivacyProtect.org
Registrant Street: C/O ID#10760, PO Box 16 Note - Visit PrivacyProtect.org to contact the domain owner/operator Note - Visit PrivacyProtect.org to contact the domain owner/operator
Registrant City: Nobby Beach
Registrant State/Province: Queensland
Registrant Postal Code: QLD 4218
Registrant Country: AU
Registrant Phone: +45.36946676
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: contact@privacyprotect.org
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Domain Admin
Admin Organization: Privacy Protection Service INC d/b/a PrivacyProtect.org
Admin Street: C/O ID#10760, PO Box 16 Note - Visit PrivacyProtect.org to contact the domain owner/operator Note - Visit PrivacyProtect.org to contact the domain owner/operator
Admin City: Nobby Beach
Admin State/Province: Queensland
Admin Postal Code: QLD 4218
Admin Country: AU
Admin Phone: +45.36946676
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
....

LMAO Wild-goose chase?

dan$ nmap -Pn -p80 208.91.196.0/24

a lot of live webservers pointing leading to http://universalfwding.com/
 
Don't you think there are a lot more constructive things we could do with our time than read a wrinkly old woman's emails? She has already proven herself to be absolutely some more of what we have had too much of in positions of leadership in our country. Do I need to find some kind of smoking gun on some abstruse topic to prove to me she is not a good bet to lead our nation? Hell no! Her very public positions on so many things already disqualify her as a seeker of peace and one who cares about inequity in America. She sat on the Walmart board. My answer to her was put so aptly by a prior first lady on an unrelated matter, but so apropos when it come to Hillary: "Just say NO!":thinking:
 
According to FOX there were redacted emails in the bunch. "Probably related to Benghazi, where loyal Americans died"
 
Don't you think there are a lot more constructive things we could do with our time than read a wrinkly old woman's emails?
Yep, this seems like a great stunt for the WSJ though. I think they got the idea from the LA Times and the Guardian who did the same thing with Sarah Palin's emails.
According to FOX there were redacted emails in the bunch. "Probably related to Benghazi, where loyal Americans died"

The interesting thing is that the left really doesn't like Hillary and they fully believe she is corrupt, yet when the right says she did something nefarious in Benghazi they non-stop make fun of them. I've never really been interested in Benghazi, because I figure even if she did do something illegal/corrupt it would never take her down because she is too powerful. Kinda like Iran Contra. So, I've never followed the the tit for tat argument. I do have a right wing friend who is tied in closely with the military contracting world and he explained it to me on the phone for 30min. I really can't remember the details because they bored me, but it had something to do with with military contracts and the wife (who has a huge contract with the military) of whatever guy was chairing one the committees investigating Benghazi.
 
And there really is nothing being covered up with Benghazi. It's a made up scandal like the long form birth-certificate. That's why people are making jokes.
 
And there really is nothing being covered up with Benghazi. It's a made up scandal like the long form birth-certificate. That's why people are making jokes.

Well, they're not quite the same. Hillary killed a US Ambassador in Benghazi. Obama only killed a low level functionary at the local records office in order to plant his fake birth certificate. They're both murder, but one of the murder victims might not have even been white, since a lot of the Hawaaian workers are whatever race it is that they have in that place.
 
Who is this "left" of which you speak? Most Democrats like Hillary.

To be honest, I can only think of one Democrat who actually likes Hillary. Maybe two. I know a lot more who are Hillary supporters because they see her as the inevitable candidate and much better than whatever the Republicans put forward. And a few who see her as a strong viable female Democrat and will at least support her because of that. But almost no one who supports Hillary herself.

Most of my friends are Democrats or left of that.
 
You at least have to admit that setting up a domain (clintonemail.com) and email server with multiple levels of LLC's created for the sake of obfuscation is a wee bit sketchy. According to FactCheck.org:

Hillary Clinton says neither the federal government nor an independent third party has the right to review emails she sent as secretary of state if she deems them personal. “Government officials are granted the privacy of their personal, non-work related emails, including personal emails on .gov accounts,” her office says.

“No one creating records on an official government network has an individual ‘privacy right’ to demand that their emails or e-records should be shielded beyond the reach of public access requests under FOI [Freedom of Information] laws, state or federal,” Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle and a former director of litigation at the National Archives, told us in an email.

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/03/clintons-email-and-the-privacy-privilege/
 
Back
Top Bottom