Fox News's Shepard Smith has the perfect response to Pope Francis's conservative criticss
I can't imagine that this trend is a good one and that it won't end without blood being spilled.
It used to be that people of different political persuasions could agree on some things because there are things you just do because it's the decent and humane thing to do. Now it's like you can't be seen to agree on anything with a political opponent for fear of looking like a political sellout.
Or has it always been like this?
I think that we are in a weird place in the world when the following things are considered political. Five things, I'm going to tick them off. These are the five things that were on [the pope] and our president's agenda. Caring for the marginalized and the poor. That's now political. Advancing economic opportunity for all. Political? Serving as good stewards of the environment. Protecting religious minorities and promoting religious freedom globally. Welcoming [and] integrating immigrants and refugees globally. And that's political?
I mean, I don't know what we expect to hear from an organization's leader like the pope of the Catholic Church other than protect those who need help, bring in refugees who have no place because of war and violence and terrorism. These seem like universal truths that we should be good to others who have less than we do, that we should give shelter to those who don't have it. I think these were the teachings in the Bible of Jesus. They're the words of the pope, they're the feelings of the president. And people who find themselves on the other side of that message should consult a mirror, it seems like. Because I think that's what we're supposed to do as a people, whatever your religion. I mean, it seems to me — and I think to probably, as Bill O'Reilly would put it, most clear-thinking Americans — that that's how we're supposed to roll.
I can't imagine that this trend is a good one and that it won't end without blood being spilled.
It used to be that people of different political persuasions could agree on some things because there are things you just do because it's the decent and humane thing to do. Now it's like you can't be seen to agree on anything with a political opponent for fear of looking like a political sellout.
Or has it always been like this?